avatarFatchecker

Summary

The article discusses the political fallout from Boris Johnson's fine for breaking COVID-19 lockdown rules by attending a party, and it satirically imagines the UK's Secretary of State for Transport, Grant Shapps, defending the actions of President Vladimir Putin regarding Ukraine in a similar manner to his defense of Johnson.

Abstract

The content reflects on the hypocrisy and political maneuvering surrounding the "Partygate" scandal involving British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. It highlights the irony of Johnson's fine for breaching lockdown rules while he holds the highest political office in the UK. The article further satirizes the situation by depicting a fictional scenario where Grant Shapps, known for defending Johnson, uses similar justifications to explain away the presence of Russian President Vladimir Putin in Ukraine. This satirical dialogue mocks the political rhetoric often used to excuse the actions of those in power. The piece also provides a list of related articles that cover various aspects of Johnson's political career, including his downfall, leadership challenges, and the subsequent political developments involving Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak. Additionally, it references a serious investigation by the House of Commons Privileges Committee into Johnson's conduct.

Opinions

  • The article presents a critical view of Boris Johnson's actions and the subsequent defense by Grant Shapps, suggesting that both are out of touch with the public and the rules they are meant to uphold.
  • It satirically implies that the justifications used by politicians like Shapps could be absurdly applied to other serious contexts, such as the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, to highlight the perceived absurdity of political excuses.
  • The piece conveys a sense of frustration with the political elite, particularly those who appear to act with impunity and then rely on their colleagues to defend their indefensible actions.
  • Through the fictional dialogue, the author seems to question the integrity and credibility of political figures who engage in defending the indefensible for political gain or loyalty.
  • The inclusion of a link to the Institute for Government's explainer on the investigation into Johnson's conduct suggests a need for accountability and transparency in government actions.

Boris Johnson. Partygate? Fine.

MANUEL LAGOS CID/CONTOUR BY GETTY IMAGES

The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Boris Johnson, a man so posh that he uses the war in Ukraine to keep his job, has been fined for breaking Lockdown rules because he attended a Downing Street party.

Secretary of State for Transport of the United Kingdom, Grant Shapps, a man so qualified for the job that he benefited from the Tory policy of “Yes, I will go and defend the indefensible,” were doing the rounds on the news this morning defending the PM.

By the way ‘PM’ stands for ‘Prime Minister’ not ‘Posh Mess.’

Anyway, in part 11 of a non-existent series I ask “What if months from now Grant Shapps had to defend President of Russia Vladimir Putin?”

Grant Shapps: ….The President went into the Ukraine….

Journalist: ‘Ukraine.’ Went into ‘Ukraine.’

Grant Shapps: That’s what I said.

Journalist: No you said….ne’ermind. You were saying?

Grant Shapps: The President went into the Ukraine. It became clear that he should not be there, so he left.

Journalist: He was there ages. He should’ve left immediately.

Grant Shapps: What you need to understand is that it was a busy time then. The President was working around the clock. He did not realise he should not be there.

Journalist: It was obvious he shouldn’t be there. Why did he stay?

Grant Shapps: He left.

Journalist: He didn’t leave immediately.

Grant Shapps: Yes, however he did leave. He recognised he shouldn’t be there. He left.

Journalist: Yes, but he shouldn’t’ve been there in the first place.

Grant Shapps: The question is, did he set out to do this? Was it something that was done with malice, with intent? The answer of course is no — it’s something that happened in error. We’ve all done it.

Journalist: Some will find it hard to believe the President didn’t realise he shouldn’t be there.

Grant Shapps: The President genuinely did not consider it an Invasion. He is human and humans make mistakes.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Boris Johnson
UK Politics
Ukraine
Covid-19
Partygate
Recommended from ReadMedium