avatarDr Mehmet Yildiz

Summary

The provided content discusses the importance and distinction between raw and filtered content in freelance writing, emphasizing the roles of writers, editors, and readers in the content development, marketing, and consumption process.

Abstract

The article delves into the nuanced preferences of readers, some favoring raw, unedited content that feels natural and heartfelt, while others prefer curated, filtered content that adheres to formal structure and narrative. It highlights the writer's perspective, where some authors write freely from the heart, using daily language, contrasting with those who craft content with a more structured and formal approach. From an editor's standpoint, the piece underscores the editor's role as a bridge between writers and readers, tailoring content to meet diverse preferences and ensuring that the content aligns with the publication's standards and audience expectations. The conclusion emphasizes the necessity of both raw and filtered content to serve different purposes and audiences, advocating for tolerance and understanding among readers, writers, and editors in the content ecosystem.

Opinions

  • Quality in content is subjective and varies among readers, writers, and editors.
  • Raw content is not inherently low quality; it caters to readers who prefer unedited, authentic material.
  • Filtered content is curated to appeal to a broader audience, often applying formal language and structure.
  • Editors play a crucial role in customizing content to align with reader preferences and publication guidelines.
  • There is a significant audience for both raw and filtered content, indicating a market for diverse content styles.
  • Writers may adopt a hybrid approach, combining elements of raw and filtered content to reach a wider readership.
  • Understanding reader preferences is essential for writers and editors to create content that resonates with their audience.
  • The article suggests that both raw and filtered content have their place and value in the publishing industry, depending on

Content Development, Marketing, and Consumption

Filtered Versus Raw Content in Freelance Writing

Both are important for different readers. Writers and editors play an essential role in the process.

Photo by Nathan Dumlao on Unsplash

Introduction

Quality is a point that many readers, writers, and editors offer opinions on. It is a widely discussed topic of content development, marketing, and consumption process. Rather than fact, quality is only an opinion in this context.

As readers, what we characterize as high or low quality may differ from other people. We should accept that the notion of quality is subjective to readers' preferences.

The terms high and low quality are used to judge preference for reading a piece of content. Not having an understanding of a topic and not having an interest in a subject does not mean that the content is low quality. This misconception is common.

Most of the time, what is characterized as low quality means that the readers do not have the knowledge and skills to understand the topic, or they don’t have an interest. In the end, this is a moot point that fails to judge a piece of content as quality or not.

For example, as a reader, I don’t have much interest in politics, and my knowledge of details in this domain is limited. By wearing my writer and editor hats, I deliberately choose not to be arrogant for judging stories that I don’t understand — especially the ones written with raw content development approach — as low quality or spam.

As an editor, I noticed that many stories written with raw style in politics gained substantial reader exposure, and some of them even went viral.

However, there are fundamental points that most of us agree on quality content. These points usually relate to the presentation and ethics rather than the actual content. For example, not many of us will consider a story on a hate speech as high quality even written in a stylish language.

In this post, I aim to point out the differences between filtered and raw content from three key aspects: reader, writer, and editor.

The basis of my approach is from reading, writing, and editing perspectives. I use two publications as examples to articulate my points. The points reflect my opinions stemming from my experience in the field.

Reader Aspect

I learned that some readers preferred only raw content. They wanted the content to be natural. Their request was not heavily edited, preferably written in daily language. These types of readers wanted unedited and uncensored content directly coming from the heart and spirit of the writers.

The structure and style can usually be informal in raw content.

I want to strongly point out that raw content does not necessarily mean low quality. The reason for highlighting this point comes from reflections of filtered content lovers.

From my experience, I find out that thousands of readers prefer raw content.

When I was analyzing the reader requirements, the patterns were distinct.

For example, I identified over 10,000 readers who prefer raw content from the writers of a publication I lead, ILLUMINATION. Therefore, to cater to the needs and desires of this reader group, I give flexibility to writers to submit content in daily language and informal style.

What does filtered content mean?

I would characterize filtered content as curated and edited using a set of criteria.

By using the editorial criteria, the content may change its format and even narrative. In other words, editors can transform the content beyond the writer's intention.

For example, the language can become more formal, and the content can become more structured. This editorial input is necessary to delight a specific reader group. However, the exercise can be costly.

I identified that the topics of filtered content usually apply to a broader audience. This means that there is a higher acceptance rate for filtered content, especially by discerning readers.

For example, the audience for my other publication, ILLUMINATION-Curated, prefers filtered content. To meet the demands of this unique reader group, I strive to provide edited and curated content.

Let me elaborate on these points (raw and filtered content) by looking at three aspects: writer, reader, and editor.

1 — Writers Perspective

Some writers write from the heart. They pay less attention to structure. The words flow freely in their articles. They use daily language, usually with “I statements” reflecting their thoughts, sentiments, and experience. I would characterize these writers as raw content developers.

Unlike raw content developers, filtered content developers produce more structured content using formal language. They narrate using the viewpoints of others with “he, she, they statements,” elaborating the topic with citations.

Some writers use the hybrid model, meaning both raw and filtered approaches. It is possible to see the hybrid model in a single story. Or some writers use the raw content delivery model in some stories and filter in others.

There is an audience for the hybrid model too.

2 — Editor’s Perspective

Editors serve as the bridge between writers and readers.

The purpose of an editor is to delight the reader by providing customized content aligning with their preferences. Editors know that some readers prefer raw and others prefer filtered content.

Editors also consider the topics for these two types of content development and delivery models.

Topics in scientific and technology fields usually require a filtered approach. Facts are more important than thoughts and opinions in science and technology. In contrast, anecdotes play a more distinct role in self-development topics.

As a practicing editor, my focus is to give a pleasant reading experience to our readers. I aim to appeal to as many readers as possible by being flexible and by offering more options on multiple topics.

It is a fundamental duty of an editor to inform the writers about the preferences of readers because editors perform a bridging role in content development and marketing life-cycle.

As an editor, I know that gold comes with dust. It is not possible to find gems in the air; they are hidden under the soil and are usually hard to harvest.

I reflect this awareness in two publications that I am responsible for their strategies. Based on reader profiles, whilst allowing more raw content in one publication, I strive to offer a more filtered range in another.

To help the writers, I guide how to create filtered content for a selected audience.

As editors, we plant our metaphorical service tree. It is not wise to expect only perfect fruit from a tree. There will be occasional spoiled fruits. We cannot kill our trees because of a few rotten fruits.

Conclusions

In this story, I attempted to show the differences between two content types — raw and filtered. Both content types are essential for serving different purposes and audiences.

As readers, being aware of our preferences and consuming content with this understanding can help us to be more tolerant readers. If we don’t like the type of content, we don’t read it. Judging a piece of content as low quality or spam does not add any value.

As writers, understanding the preferences of our readers can help us to choose and customize our delivery model. Our ultimate goal is to make our readers happy.

As editors, we need to make a conscious effort to understand the needs and wants of readers and inform the writers for the audience groups of the publishing process and venture.

There is a need and market for both raw and filtered content.

Thank you for reading my perspectives. I wish you a healthy and happy life.

If you enjoyed this story, you might also check my experience on other topics.

Ten Hobbies Enhanced the Quality of My Life over the Past Five Decades

Healthy, Wealthy, and Happy People Taught Me 10 Valuable Lessons

I wish I had Gone Self-Employed 40 Years Ago for Three Reasons.

Besides aiming to increase the hormonal intelligence of my readers and writing about neurotransmitters such as dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin, GABA, and acetylcholine, one of my goals as a writer is to raise awareness about the causes and risk factors of prevalent diseases that can lead to suffering and death for a large portion of the population.

I aim to educate, create awareness, and empower my readers to take control of their health and well-being.

To raise awareness about health issues, I have written several articles that present my holistic health findings from research, personal observations, and unique experiences. Below are links to these articles for easy access.

Metabolic Syndrome, Type II Diabetes, Fatty Liver Disease, Heart Disease, Strokes, Obesity, Liver Cancer, Autoimmune Disorders, Homocysteine, Lungs Health, Pancreas Health, Kidneys Health, NCDs, Infectious Diseases, Brain Health, Dementia, Depression, Brain Atrophy, Neonatal Disorders, Skin Health, Dental Health, Bone Health, Leaky Gut, Leaky Brain, Brain Fog, Chronic Inflammation, Insulin Resistance, Elevated Cortisol, Leptin Resistance, Anabolic Resistance, Cholesterol, High Triglycerides, Metabolic Disorders, Gastrointestinal Disorders, and Major Diseases.

I also wrote about valuable nutrients. Here are the links for easy access:

Boron, Urolithin, taurine, citrulline malate, biotin, lithium orotate, alpha-lipoic acid, n-acetyl-cysteine, acetyl-l-carnitine, CoQ10, PQQ, NADH, TMG, creatine, choline, digestive enzymes, magnesium, zinc, hydrolyzed collagen, nootropics, pure nicotine, activated charcoal, Vitamin B12, Vitamin B1, Vitamin D, Vitamin K2, Omega-3 Fatty Acids, N-Acetyl L-Tyrosine, and other nutrients to improve metabolism and mental health.

Disclaimer: Please note that my posts do not include professional or health advice. I document my reviews, observations, experience, and perspectives only to provide information and create awareness.

I publish my lifestyle, health, and well-being stories on EUPHORIA. My focus is on metabolic, cellular, mitochondrial, and mental health. Here is my collection of Insightful Life Lessons from Personal Stories.

If you enjoy writing and storytelling, you can join Medium, NewsBreak, and Vocal as a creator to find your voice, reach out to a broad audience, and monetize your content.

You may also check my blog posts about my articles and articles of other writers contributing to my publications on Medium. I share them on my website digitalmehmet.com. Here is my professional bio. You can contact me via weblink.

If you are a writer, you can join Medium, Vocal Media, and NewsBreak as a writer using my referral links and monetizing your content while inspiring a large audience.

You might join my six publications on Medium as a writer by sending a request via this link. 17K+ writers contribute to my publications. You might find more information about my professional background. You may join Medium with my referral link.

Writing
Lifestyle
Self Improvement
Mental Health
Freelancing
Recommended from ReadMedium