avatarJ.J. Pryor

Summary

The author analyzed 100 popular Medium stories to find out what makes a post popular on Medium and discovered some common underlying factors.

Abstract

The author, J.J. Pryor, was curious about what makes a post popular on Medium and decided to analyze 100 popular stories from the "Popular on Medium" section. The author found that the best statistical way to get selected in Popular on Medium is to publish at the end of October, change your name to Drew

I Analyzed 100 ‘Popular on Medium’ Stories: Here’s What I Found Out

Here’s what I found out about the list of popular stories, their number of claps, headlines, publications, topics, and authors

Photo by Lidya Nada on Unsplash

Lately, I’ve been curious about what makes a post popular on Medium versus a viral blog on the rest of the interwebs. Many of us love to write on Medium, but outside of a few top individuals, many of the underworkings of this platform remain a mystery.

I wanted to see if I could find some common underlying factors in what curators might be looking for in general. Luckily for me, there’s a curated section called “Popular on Medium” that is made by staff at the company. You can find the section here.

The topic linked to above can go on for miles and miles, so I decided just to stick with the 100 most recently selected stories that are listed there.

Here’s what I found out!

Note: Just in case you haven’t become a Medium member yet, I’d love you eternally if you signed up using my referral link! I’ll get a small commission at no cost to you and you’ll get eternal love — win-win!

What is the single best statistical way to get selected in Popular on Medium?

  1. Travel back in time to the end of October and publish then (10% of all stories)
  2. Change your name to Drew Magary (7%) or run for president of the USA
  3. Get published in OneZero (19%)
  4. Use a directly related topic image (37%)
  5. Write an article on life advice (32%) or society problems/solutions (25%)
  6. Use a headline that tells people what they should or shouldn’t do (31%)

Easy right?

I’ll try to stick to the point and break down each category below for easy reading, starting with the ranges I used.

Ranges and Categories

Below are the ranges for each of the categories I noted down. Some of the figures, like number of claps, surprised me. These can’t be the most popular stories on Medium. Rather, I get the feeling that a staff member at Medium selects a few stories every few days that fit their goals that month.

  • Stories Reviewed: 100
  • Claps Range: 400 to 69,000
  • Date Range: 14 March 2017 to 27 December 2019
  • Publications Used: 30
  • Different Authors: 82
  • Image Categories: None, Semi-related Cartoon, Semi-related Image, Topic Image, Topic Cartoon
  • Topic Categories: Business XYZ, Life Advice, Politics, Reviews, Scary Thing, Scientific, Society Problems/Solutions, This Happened to Me/Person
  • Title Categories: Expert Says XYZ, Extreme Possibility Statement, I Did XYZ and Here’s What I Found, Review of XYZ, Scary/Exciting truth about group XYZ doing XYZ, Story Title (relies on the description), Time X Something Happened, You Shouldn’t/Should XYZ

Claps

Before I started this analysis, I really expected to see claps for all stories being at least 10,000. I thought that would be the case based on what Medium labels the page as being:

Source: Author’s screenshot

I was very wrong!

  • Only 25% of the selected articles had more than 10,000 claps!

I think we should still be able to use this as a generic test for readership, even though Medium changed their MPP system. There might be fewer claps today, but they can still be used as a level of reading assessment.

  • 67% of the stories had between 1,000 and 9,999 claps.
  • With the remaining 8% being below 1,000!
  • Two articles even had below 500 claps and yet we’re still selected as ‘trending’ — hmm.

Dates

The dates we’re also interesting. Before beginning, I expected to see a good mix of really old but very SEO strong Medium articles, as well as topical ones from more recent months. Wrong again J.J. Pryor!

  • 80% of the articles were from October 2019 until now.
  • 5% were from 2017 and 10% from 2018.

I suppose the curators or staff who select these are trying to keep things more up to date. Can’t argue with that, but I do believe we’re seeing evidence that these aren’t actually the most ‘trending’ articles at any given point.

Publications

I had expected about half of the publications to be from Medium’s own just based on their recent statements. And I was finally right — Woooooo!

Medium has stated that they will be pushing their own publications more than others. And that’s certainly evident here!

  • 56% of the stories I went through were published through a Medium owned publication.
  • 9% were published in Coach Tony’s three magazines — Better Humans, Better Marketing, and Better Programming.
  • 9% were interestingly self-published (several of these were famous politicians running for president).
  • P.S. I Love You had 4 stories of the 100.
  • The rest were the usual mix of big publications and a surprisingly large amount of small ones I haven’t heard of before (usually 1 off)

Authors

I was pleasantly surprised with the diversity and range of the authors in this list. As mentioned above, there were 82 different authors out of the 100 stories.

I also half-expected to only see really big Medium-famous names on most of these articles. Again, I was happy to see that it was quite a mix.

We do see Tim Denning, Jeff Goins, Darius Foroux, Coach Tony, Dave Schools and Thomas Oppong — but they only have a total of 10% of the articles combined.

None of the articles I came across were about writing, blogging, or improving at Medium!

I’m sure that’s a fresh dose of relief as that’s usually the majority of my main page — granted its what I read a lot about and the algorithm ‘helps’ me keep that habit.

Some other interesting names to see were Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, and Rep. Beto O'Rourke — no Republicans here.

Images

I should’ve made more categories for images, but I’m only human and was getting short of time. I ended up using some broad categories instead, as I listed above.

For the most part, the images were all applicable, with a few even making me chuckle after reading the story title.

  • 37% showed a direct topic image. If the article was about Starbucks, it showed a picture of the brand or store.
  • 36% used a semi-related direct topic image. These would be ones that showed a picture of a generic fancy coffee.
  • 21% used a semi-related cartoon professional drawing. These often tended to be publications like OneZero or Gen. I suppose they have a professional artist on hand that makes these for the articles. Imagine a wacky coffee drawing.
  • 5% showed a direct topic cartoon professional drawing. A cartoon version of a Starbucks branch.
  • 1 had no image at all! But was from the politician Beto O’Rourke so I guess that faux-pas can be forgiven.

Most of the images were of professional quality and outside of the cartoons, were probably taken from Unsplash. In an older article or two, I did see some pixelated images that may have been taken in real life or from somewhere on Google. The image quality has clearly been made generally better over time.

Topics

This one was a bit difficult to classify before I sat down to research. I debated using the tags of the stories but found them a bit of a hassle to keep track of in Excel. Many of the stories also had quite strange and uber-specific tags. So I decided to make my own general categories and ended up with 8 different ones (listed above).

  • 32% were listed as life advice. I guess people are truly suckers for finding solutions to our everyday lives.
  • 25% were about problems or solutions in society. Some were telling stories about why wars were happening or people being oppressed. Some were about work-life and groups of people being ostracized.
  • 11% were stories that I love to read — This Happened to Me kind of articles.
  • 11% were also about specific businesses and something they have done, are doing, or want to do.
  • 7% talked about a scientific advancement or issue.
  • Of course, we have politics at 5%, and most of those were written by a politician themselves (or rubber-stamped probably)
  • Interestingly, 5% of the stories were reviews of some kind. Whether raving about a product or reviewing an ingredient.
  • The remaining 4% was about scary things that occur or exist

Titles

For the last aspect of these stories I researched, I had to make a decision on how to classify them. There’s many different ways a title can be written, but I came up with 8 ways to specify them for this review.

  • 31% of the stories gave advice on what you should or shouldn’t do. This included a few different ways to say the same idea though. Do you want to drink coffee? Should you drink coffee? 10 ways to drink a cup of coffee. You get the idea.
  • 28% of the stories were about a scary/exciting subject, and a group/company/product that is doing making it happen. Mostly fear-mongering but some positive articles as well. Coffee drinkers are killing the tea industry! — type of thing.
  • Fortunately, one of the topics I tend to enjoy reading more was at 16% — Time(s) X-something happened to me/that person. These are often very interesting true stories and wrap up what they did in the end with a lesson. The time I drank too many coffees and wrote a Medium story about popular Medium Stories!
  • 10% had a title that was vague like you would see as a title of a book. The descriptions of these stories usually would then explain the title and what you could expect in the story. Partying Monkeys! With a description of Why monkeys love to party when they eat lots of coffee beans.
  • 6% of the articles were a review of some sorts. I tasted Starbucks super premium extra fragalistic pumpkin butter pickle coffee and loved it!
  • 3% of the stories were discussing what an expert thinks about a subject. Carrot Top’s expert opinion on snorting caffeine pills every day.
  • Another 3% were another kind of story I enjoy reading — I did XYZ and here’s what I found out. We all like to learn from the experience of others right? I had a Starbucks coffee and found a roach in it, here’s what I found out about alternative protein sources!
  • The last 3% were extreme statements of possibilities with two of them being scientific in nature. Aliens will be coffee addicts within 200 years!

Wrap up

I went down this rabbit hole to see if I could discover some commonalities in what Medium is looking for in a good story. I didn’t realize that these wouldn’t be a list of the most-read articles, nor that it turned out to not be a true ‘top-trends’ list of stories.

It’s clear to me that there is a human hand in selecting which articles get chosen in this list and that makes it a bit less meaningful to me. It’s not showing what the crowd wants, rather more of what Medium staff want (or are directed to want).

But that last point is then useful. If you want to write an article suited for Medium, then this review should be able to help with that.

So, if you’re aiming to do just that, I’d suggest taking a look through the statistics above and finding what topics and publications are more suitable to your writing style.

Quick review:

  1. Pick a few topics
  2. Write an article
  3. Try to mimic one of the popular title styles
  4. Go apply to the publications!

Thanks for reading! To get other helpful lists and advice for Medium, be sure to follow the Feedium publication!

Please also consider following my free newsletter to keep up with me and my crazy shenanigans!

J.J. Pryor

Note Again: Just in case you haven’t become a Medium member yet, I’d love you eternally if you signed up using my referral link! I’ll get a small commission at no cost to you and you’ll get eternal love — win-win!

The 100 articles I looked at:

Medium
Writing
Blogging
Advice
Curation
Recommended from ReadMedium