avatarMatthew Maniaci

Summary

The article distinguishes between redemption and atonement, emphasizing the importance of understanding the nuances between seeking forgiveness (redemption) and making amends without the need for forgiveness (atonement).

Abstract

The text delves into the complexities of personal transformation following wrongdoing, contrasting redemption, which involves seeking forgiveness from those wronged, with atonement, which is about self-improvement and making amends without expecting forgiveness. It highlights that redemption requires both the wrongdoer's efforts and the victim's willingness to forgive, whereas atonement is an independent journey towards betterment. The article suggests that while both paths can lead to positive change, the motivation behind seeking redemption must be genuine, and one must respect the victim's autonomy in granting forgiveness. It also acknowledges that sometimes, the pursuit of redemption or atonement may not be necessary or appropriate, particularly in cases of manipulation or false offense.

Opinions

  • Redemption is often misunderstood or misrepresented in fiction compared to its complex nature in real life.
  • Atonement is portrayed as a selfless action that does not hinge on the victim's forgiveness and can lead to personal growth.
  • The article posits that seeking redemption can sometimes be selfish, especially if it's motivated by a desire to return to the status quo or manipulate the victim.
  • It is emphasized that victims are not obligated to forgive, and this should be respected by those seeking redemption.
  • Atonement should be pursued with no expectations of forgiveness to avoid disappointment.
  • The author believes that everyone has the capacity for growth and that choosing to seek redemption or atonement is a sign of a desire to improve oneself.
  • The article cautions against using the pursuit of redemption as a means to intentionally offend others and then seek forgiveness, labeling this behavior as manipulative.
  • It is noted that in some cases, the perceived wrongdoing may not be the fault of the accused, and thus redemption or atonement would be unnecessary or inappropriate.

The Difference Between Redemption and Atonement

And why it is important.

Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

Redemption is a common trope in fiction. We talk of characters who did bad things who get “redemption arcs” and eventually come to be seen as better people through that redemption.

Unfortunately, redemption in the real world is much more complicated than spending a couple of episodes doing good things or making a single heroic sacrifice. To redeem yourself in the eyes of someone you’ve wronged takes a lot of effort and action on your part, and you need to prove that you have changed as a person.

However, part of redemption is getting the forgiveness of the person you’ve wronged. This is not always realistic; there may be nothing substantial that you can do to prove your redemption, and the person you have wronged has no obligation to actually forgive you.

This is where an important distinction needs to be made: the difference between redemption and atonement.

As I’ve described above, redemption is the seeking of forgiveness from one’s victim. Both parties need to take part in redemption, and without that, redemption is impossible.

On the other hand, atonement is seeking to improve things for the benefit of everyone without the requirement for forgiveness. Atonement does not require the person you’ve wronged to forgive you, as it is about improving yourself in reaction to the wrongs you’ve perpetrated on others. In short, if you’ve wronged someone and are trying to change yourself for the better without the need for forgiveness, that is atonement.

Atonement sometimes leads to redemption but doesn’t require it. When performed earnestly and honestly, atonement is a selfless action — you recognize the flaws in yourself and seek to change them regardless of the approval of any other party.

On the other hand, seeking redemption can be (but isn’t always) a selfish action, particularly if you’re doing it to seek the status quo. Plenty of abusers seek redemption from their victims, only to backslide into the problematic behaviors once forgiveness is granted. This is a common manipulation technique and can be used to keep victims trapped in the abuser’s web.

That doesn’t mean that redemption is a selfish action by nature. You can earnestly seek redemption with the absolute intent of being a better person; you can also earn redemption through atonement as an unintended but positive consequence of your actions.

Additionally, I don’t necessarily think one is better than the other per se. Honestly seeking redemption can be an unqualified good thing, while using atonement as deception or manipulation is clearly a bad thing.

That said, if you’ve wronged someone, be aware of their feelings when you choose to seek redemption or atonement. It’s perfectly reasonable to seek and want redemption and forgiveness, but remember that they have no obligation to forgive you.

On the other hand, seeking atonement needs to be done with no expectations from the wronged party. Trying to “atone” when you’re actually seeking their forgiveness will likely lead to disappointment on the part of everyone.

Everyone I have ever met has said or done something to wrong someone else. It is part of being human, I think, in a very fundamental way; nobody says the exact right thing all the time, and whether intentional or not, we all do things to hurt others at some point in our lives.

The defining factor is what you do once you’ve realized that you wronged someone. You should decide whether to seek redemption or atonement, but in most cases, honestly attempting to seek either is a good sign. It shows that you have a desire for growth and self-improvement.

On the other hand, sometimes the party you have “wronged” is actually the one at fault. Abusers and manipulators often use a false sense of offense as a means to separate their victims from potential helpers and will react strongly to potential challenges. In those cases, you may have nothing to apologize for, even though you have “wronged” someone, and redemption or atonement is unnecessary or even the wrong course of action.

Regardless, it is generally good to seek personal growth, and redemption and atonement are avenues for that. Realizing that you’ve messed up and that you need to improve is a good sign and tends to reflect well on you as a person.

Just don’t go around intentionally offending people so you can score redemption points. Who even does that?

If you liked this, please subscribe to my publication, Thing a Day. I publish something every day on a variety of topics, so you never know what you’re going to see!

Here are some other things I’ve written:

Redemption
Atonement
Relationships
Abuse
Mental Health
Recommended from ReadMedium