Iran Problematic for Democrats

Summary

The website content discusses the complex political implications of the Ukrainian plane crash in Iran, with a focus on the varying interpretations of Nancy Pelosi's comments and the rumors surrounding the passengers, many of whom were speculated to be nuclear scientists.

Abstract

The article delves into the multifaceted narrative surrounding the tragic downing of a Ukrainian passenger plane in Iran, which occurred amidst heightened tensions following the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani. It scrutinizes Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's statements on ABC News, where she addressed the Iranian protests and the plane crash, sparking diverse reactions. The content suggests that Pelosi's remarks may have been misinterpreted as dismissive of the protests, and it raises questions about the legitimacy of the demonstrations in the context of geopolitical strategies like "Color Revolutions." The article also explores unverified claims that the plane carried Iranian nuclear scientists attempting to flee the country, which the Iranian government allegedly knew about, leading to speculation about the intentionality of the crash. Additionally, the piece touches on the broader implications of the incident, including the potential impact on Iranian sanctions, the legal proceedings of Julian Assange, and the alleged connection between Wikileaks and Iranian affairs.

Opinions

The author implies skepticism about the official narrative of the plane crash, suggesting it may not have been simply a tragic accident.
There is an underlying criticism of Nancy Pelosi's communication style, which is portrayed as potentially misleading or dismissive regarding the Iranian protests.
The article insinuates that the U.S. Democratic Party may have a vested interest in "Color Revolutions" and that Pelosi's comments reflect this perspective.
The author entertains the idea that the Iranian government may have had a motive to destroy the plane, based on rumors about the passengers' identities as nuclear scientists.
There is a conspiratorial tone regarding the potential connections between Wikileaks' activities and significant political events concerning Iran.
The piece hints at a broader narrative of covert operations and geopolitical maneuvering, including the mention of single-use narco submarines and their relation to drug trade and sanctions evasion.

Iran Problematic for Democrats

Nancy Pelosi has been talking about the situation in Iran on ABC news.

The reaction to her comments is interesting. But to fully understand what she is talking about I recommend taking some of these patent medicine Pelosi pills. Oh don’t worry they are quite harmless (and marvellous for the skin). According to the bottle they are mainly amphetamine, to be taken with just the right amount of vintage Bayer ‘non-addictive’ cough syrup.

Ohhhhhhhh….bubbles…..

Ms Pelosi, perhaps as a result of old age, does have a rather unfortunate way of speaking. So when she says, “well the regime… the protestors are… at… protesting, as I understand it, *points finger* this brand of protestors, about the fact that the plane went down. And many students were on the plane, and these are largely students on the street. *scratches septum* Um…” what people hear as her dismissing the protests. And no doubt some will notice the reference to ‘brand of protest’ and interpret it as her saying that this is not a certified George Soros Colour Revolution: (favoured by the Democrats); and therefore illegitimate.

However twice she raises the legitimate question of why the plane was allowed to fly at a time when Iran was attacking the airbases in Iraq.

There is a rumour that the ‘students’ on the plane were actually nuclear scientists who, fearful the US was going to attack the ‘Cultural Site’ at which they worked, insisted that the Iranian ‘regime’ allow them to leave the country. Perturbed that these ‘students’ would be debriefed upon return, the ‘regime’ deliberately destroyed the plane.

Some credence is perhaps given to this rumour, in that the ‘regime’ warned relatives not to speak about events if they wanted the bodies returned for burial.

Of course this is just a rumour. It was an accident. A tragic mistake. The reckless action of a lone wolf IRGC grunt, who acted alone (because the comms net was ‘jammed’ (don’t ask how or by whom)).

For now we don’t need worry ourselves with this sort of thing, and certainly not this sort of thing.

Those so inclined are welcome to go through the passenger list, and match the names to companies and institutions. I shan’t bother, preferring in instead to read the human interest stories, and look at wedding photos.

Oh yeah… no… there’s probably nothing in crackpot George Webb’s allegations about the Blackberrys…

But back to glassy-eyed Nancy Pelosi, “no… well, whatever it is, but the fact is this. Their, the, they, there were protestors in the streets before against the regime. After the taking out of Soleimani there were protestors in the street, joined together *nods head* as you know: against us. That wasn’t good. And taking down this plane was a terrible, terrible tragedy, and they should be held accountable for letting commercial flights”…. yadda yadda…

Ok. tinfoil hats on…

If these people on the plane were nuclear scientists, why were so many of them studying in Canada?

Oh and Julian Assange is back in court….

Which reminds me I really should one day sit down and try to work out the connections between Wikileaks and the Iranian sanctions…. let’s see what I have so far… Wikileaks posts first leak Dec 2006, Iran sanctions imposed Dec 2006. IRGC declared terrorists in the same week as Assange arrested….

And just when the tinfoil on my hat is wearing thin…. this happens…. I do hope the Chinese naval base is alright….

Oh and on a completely unrelated subject, did you know the Spanish have a problem with single-use narco submarines? Apparently you can have one built for about £1.5million in the jungles of Guyana and Surinam.