avatarAldric Chen

Summary

An editor from ILLUMINATION reflects on the editorial process, detailing what editors look for in stories and their vigilance against plagiarism.

Abstract

The article provides an insider's perspective on the editorial process within a high-volume publication. It discusses the editor's desire for thoughtful and enlightening content, as opposed to the repetitive themes that frequently populate the submission queue. The editor emphasizes the importance of originality and the value of hard work, citing examples from authors who delve into the complexities of human interaction and the nature of difficulty. The piece also underscores the publication's zero-tolerance policy towards plagiarism, outlining various forms of plagiarism and the methods editors use to detect and address it. The editor concludes by reaffirming their commitment to publishing quality work and maintaining the integrity of the publication.

Opinions

  • Editors seek stories that are insightful and provide genuine knowledge, moving beyond cliché and overdone topics.
  • There is a recognition of the hard work and unique perspectives that writers bring to their stories, with appreciation for articles that challenge readers and encourage critical thinking.
  • The editor expresses a love-hate relationship with the editing process, acknowledging the emotional impact of story rejections.
  • Plagiarism is a significant concern, with the editor detailing the publication's processes for detecting it, including the use of specialized tools to identify copied content and images.
  • Writers are reminded of the importance of proper attribution when using external sources or images to avoid plagiarism.
  • The publication values its reputation and takes steps to ensure that all published content is original and credited appropriately.
  • The editor encourages a collaborative relationship between writers and editors, emphasizing that the goal is not to make writers' lives difficult but to work together to produce high-quality work.

Editorial Op-Ed | Of Reading and Editing

Inside the Minds of Editors: What We Look Forward to and Look Out for

A Day-in-a-Life of an editor

Photo by Romain Dancre on Unsplash

Dear Writers,

What are your impressions of editors? Are we annoying? Pain in the ass? Or, maybe, you see us as folks who can polish your stories?

Perspectives, in my opinion, are everything.

Personally, I have a love-hate relationship with many editors. Story rejections dampen my spirit for the day.

That is one side of the story, literally.

As an editor of a high-volume, writer-oriented ILLUMINATION publication, I see many stories sitting in the publication queue awaiting review, edit, and publication daily.

In this story, I will address what we look forward to and what we look out for.

What We Look Forward To

Good stories.

In truth, it is difficult to surprise us. I have read many permutations of the following story headlines:

  • 10 Ways to Live a Good Life.
  • How to be Successful as a _______.
  • I Made $____ in ____ months.
  • I Attracted ____ Followers on Facebook / Linkedin / Instagram in _____ Months.
  • 5 Ways to Overcome the Writer’s Block.
  • What I Write, What I Read, What I Do.
  • Simple Tips from, Ancient Tips from, Pre-Historic Tips from, Jurassic Age Tips from.
  • Success happens if we do this, failure is the mother of success, and massive success leads to failure.

There are hundreds of these sitting in the publication queue right now.

As writers, we always believe we have produced the next ground-breaking, viral story.

Editors who read, edit, copy-proof thousands of stories have read such topics over and over. We want to read stories that are thoughtful and knowledge enlightening.

Take, for instance, the following story by John Reel.

Here’s how the theory works. When you faced a difficult test in school, you studied harder. Regardless of the test results, your increased efforts led to you knowing more. It was your choice to accept the test as difficult. People ignore obvious difficulties all the time. I’ll prove it. Learning an instrument, for example. It’s hard, but millions pick up a guitar thinking it will be easy. That’s why so many people turn their guitars from an instrument to a piece of decor.

John Reel | The Theory of Difficulty

In an age where everyone is searching for a quick fix, John illuminates the value of hard work. I concur.

Another story caught my attention through its Sub-titles: Contending with people’s opposing views.

If you enter into the conversation not thinking that you are better than the person with an opposing view, you have a better chance of a meaningful discussion… I’ve been in many conversations where someone will say, “We’re just going to have to agree to disagree.” Yet, this innocent phrase used with a superior attitude falls on deaf ears. When presented to me like that, this phrase is worthless.

Michael Hollifield | Can You Really Be That Stupid?

This is a well-written story because it spells out our daily encounter of seemingly innocuous speech.

Is there really value in saying let us agree to disagree?

I don’t know, you tell me.

What We Look Out For

In brief: Plagiarism.

Plagiarism manifests itself in many forms, and these are the common ones.

1. Outright Plagiarism

Copying and pasting content in its entirety with no credit attribution to original content or content author.

1a. How editors detect:

We perform duplication checks, so it becomes apparent to us within 5 minutes.

1b. What writers should do:

Use blockquotes and/or pull quotes to attribute credit.

2. Mosaic Plagiarism

Copying and pasting content from multiple sources, with no credit attribution to original content or content author.

2a. How editors detect:

See Section 1a.

2b. What writers should do:

As per Section 1b.

3. Value-Adding Plagiarism (Images)

It comes with claims such as: “I design the image myself.”

3a. How editors detect:

We have tools to trace back to original images. They lead us to copyright-free images worked on by content creators, which they claim as their own.

3b. What writers should do:

Attribute credit to the original content creator before elaborating the add-ons done by the writer.

When such behaviors are detected, we will contact the writers for clarifications.

Please note, the right to publish lies with the publication.

Summary

I hope you enjoyed this editorial op-ed.

Editors do not exist to make writers miserable. We work to publish great work.

We want to be of service to all writers.

At the same time, we have to defend our reputation as a clean publication, free from plagiarism.

Happy Writing, People.

Aldric

Dr Mehmet Yildiz Liam Ireland Maria Rattray Terry L. Cooper Carol Price Britni Pepper Agnes Laurens Tree Langdon The Maverick Files Josh Balerite Acol Karen Madej Dr. Preeti Singh Claire Kelly Dew Langrial Geetika Sethi Noorain Hassan, BMS John Cunningham Esther George

About the Author:

As a content contributor, I write my observations from daily life and my business exposure. Because our life experience is the bedrock of our unique perspectives.

Do reach out and say hi on Linkedin and Twitter!

Reading
Editor
Newsletter
Advice
Writing
Recommended from ReadMedium