Summary
The text reflects on society's tendency to impose unattainable standards and expectations, while often failing to uphold these same standards themselves.
Abstract
The article titled "Impossible Standards" delves into the societal construct of setting unreachable benchmarks, which are hypocritically disregarded by those who establish them. It criticizes the creation of laws and expectations that are not followed by the creators themselves, leading to a futile pursuit of prizes that cannot be granted. The piece suggests that intellect is reduced to superficial scripts, and the true aim of these impossible standards is to exert power over others, to either boost one's own ego or to compensate for a sense of lost pride. The author describes how these standards are articulately presented but are ultimately hollow, creating a facade of strength and intelligence that is devoid of substance. The article concludes by likening the dynamic between those who set standards and those who follow them to that of masters and slaves, highlighting the inherent failure in such reasoning, despite the convincing facade presented to the public.
Opinions
- The author believes that society imposes laws and standards that are not adhered to by those who create them.
- There is a sense of hypocrisy in expecting others to strive for prizes that the leaders cannot or will not provide.
- The pursuit of power is seen as a driving force behind setting impossible standards, serving to subjugate others and mask the insecurities of those in power.
- Intellectual discussions are reduced to meaningless dialogue, which undermines the genuine pursuit of knowledge and enlightenment.
- The article suggests that the standards set by society are a mere illusion, designed to maintain control and conceal the flawed nature of those who impose them.
- The dynamic between those who set and those who follow standards is compared to an oppressive master-slave relationship, indicating a systemic issue in the way society operates.
