avatarThe Wordsmith🏳️‍🌈🇺🇸™

Summary

The article argues for teaching the scientific basis of human sexuality and fostering an attitude of inclusivity and respect towards LGBT+ individuals, rather than attempting to teach the concept of love, which is a biological response beyond conscious instruction.

Abstract

The author of the article expresses a viewpoint on the education of LGBT+ issues, emphasizing that love cannot be taught as it is a primal biochemical response. Instead, the author suggests that teaching the scientific facts about human sexuality and promoting a positive attitude towards diversity and inclusion from an early age is more effective in fostering acceptance of LGBT+ individuals. The article highlights the importance of countering religious dogma that opposes diversity in sexual orientation by appealing to reason and the recognition of LGBT+ identities as part of the natural order. It posits that by the time individuals reach high school, their attitudes are deeply ingrained, making it crucial to introduce these concepts early in life. The author also challenges the notion that opposition to LGBT+ rights is a matter of religious belief, arguing that such stances are irrational and rooted in outdated biases.

Opinions

  • Love is an innate biological response that cannot be taught or imposed.
  • It is important to educate about the science of human sexuality to dispel misconceptions and promote understanding.
  • Teaching inclusivity and respect for diversity should start at a young age to effectively shape attitudes.
  • Religious beliefs that oppose LGBT+ rights are challenged as being contrary to biological facts and reason.
  • The author believes that by high school, it is often too late to change deeply ingrained prejudices.
  • Official Church dogma that labels homosexual acts as "intrinsically immoral" is criticized as an "irrational prejudice of small minds."
  • The article suggests that acceptance of LGBT+ individuals should be seen as a biological fact and part of God's design, despite religious doctrine.
  • The author advocates for teaching acceptance and respect for the natural diversity in sexual orientation rather than trying to force love or approval.

ESSAY | ON PUBLIC POLICY

I Don’t Care If They Don’t Teach Love

What I want them to teach is this

Acceptance | credit: Rawpixel.com | Shutterstock (under standard license)

Can We Please Teach Love

That’s the Prism & Pen prompt for 14–28 February 2022.

Frankly, I don’t care if straight people love me or not. I don’t care if straight people try to teach love of gays or not. I don’t think they can.

Love is not a concept one can teach another. It’s a primal, deeply biological response to stimuli.¹ ² ³

One can’t teach another to have a biochemical response. It’s nonsensical. Just as one can’t teach a person to be homosexual, one can’t teach him to love homosexuals (read LGBT+ people).

Teach Fact

What one can teach, in the sense of knowing, is facts — the science behind human sexuality.

[T]here is overwhelming evidence of a biological basis for sexual orientation that is programmed into the brain before birth based on a mix of genetics and prenatal conditions.

Teach kids that and they are on the road to accepting LGBT+ people as part of the natural order of human sexuality. That is something one can teach and at an early age.

Teach Attitude.

What one can teach is attitude, not fact but mindset. Teach an attitude favoring diversity and inclusion of people different from oneself.

Teach a doctrine of inclusivity and rejection of exclusion and hatred from an early age. Teach by example, deed, and word. Teach kids. They are incredible mimics; they will pick up on the lesson.

By high school it’s too late. It’s not a lesson learned from example; it’s an intellectual exercise, an appeal to reason. If the teenager has been taught from infancy to hate, to reject diverse people, to exclude people different from himself, he will reject the intellectual appeal as contrary to his deep-seated inclination.

The lesson will fail because it tells the child to reject his core self, something a teenager is not likely to do. Reason won’t prevail in the teen over his sense of self. Not in the average teen. Perhaps such an instruction will succeed in the few teens inclined to think for themselves, inclined not to believe something simply because most do. But those teens are precious few.

Change Religious Beliefs

To get a teen or adult to reject his core beliefs, one must bring incredible force to bear. Religious doctrine is that force. Teach a reasoning person he must accept, or at least respect, diversity or risk the disfavor of God and one brings to bear a primal force ingrained from childhood. One sets one core belief in opposition to another. God is prime. God’s doctrine will overcome.

The Catholic Church opposes the acceptance of homosexuality within Christian society. … According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, “homosexual acts” are “acts of grave depravity” that are “intrinsically disordered.” It continues, “They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.

Homosexual acts are “intrinsically immoral and contrary to the natural law.” Moreover, though same-sex sexual orientation is not a “sin” in and of itself,

it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder.” Ibid.

That is not only Catholic dogma but also official doctrine in all western-world religions. So long as it is God’s will, so long will opposition to and exclusion of LGBT+ people be the official attitude of every religious person and even many non-religious people.

Do Not Try To Impose Love on Them

In that endeavor, one will fail. Appeal to their sense of reason instead. Ask them at least to tolerate diversity in sexual orientation because it’s demonstrably part of the natural order. It’s a biological fact. Appeal to reason. It’s unreasonable to oppose a biological fact.

One might as well oppose rabbits as oppose diversity in sexual orientation. For one to say he “opposes” rabbits would be illogical, irrational, and inane. It’s a silly attitude. Just so silly is it to “oppose” diversity in sexual orientation.

Don’t try to teach them to love us. That requires too great an affirmative action on their part.

Teach them instead to accept and respect the fact of the natural order of things. If it’s a biological fact, it’s necessarily part of God’s design for life on Earth, Church Doctrine to the contrary not withstanding. Official Church dogma then becomes the irrational prejudice of small minds still vested in biases originating in the superstitions of 3,000 years ago.

This story is a response to the Prism & Pen writing prompt, Queer as Kids: Or … Can We Please Teach Love?

Other stories so far:

More from The Desk of

The Wordsmiith™🏳️‍🌈🇺🇸— Existentialist Extraordinaire | quote on the scroll from Robert Frost | author’s registered trademark
LGBTQ
Acceptance
Gay Love
Equality
Science
Recommended from ReadMedium