Feminism, Feminism (Which Witch is Which?)

Back in the mists of time, ok, the 80s, a female pal hypothecated (not a real word) that in the way old olden days strong independent women were considered a threat to patriarchy, so the Witch Trials were invented to “keep them in check.”
However these were hardly fair trials.
1st Witchfinder: What sayest thou to the accusation of witchcraft?
2nd Witchfinder: She be sayest noat. She be dead. Drownded
1st Witchfinder: You be unhappy with my methods?
2nd Witchfinder: Well thee could be testing thy methods first.
1st Witchfinder: Fuck no.
Unfortunately for the women folk, men folk of the time were obsessed with facial hair.
“Occam’s razor is a principle often attributed to 14th century friar William of Ockham that says that if you have two competing ideas to explain the same phenomenon, you should prefer the simpler one.” — New Scientist
If only the men folk had been more imaginative. If only the men folk had thought outside the stocks. If only the men folk had been aware of that very wise person who once said, “It is a truth universally acknowledged that everything is shit easy to understand when reduced to multiple choice with no wrong answers.”
There is a scene in Unsolved Histories with Lucy Worsley, ‘The Witch Hunts’, that perfectly illustrates this tried and tested theory and would’ve provided the men folk of the time with an opportunity to consider alternative reasons for ‘a gathering of women.’
Question. If it not be witchcraft, what they be up to?
