Do You Make Decisions by Thinking or Feeling?
Carl Jung’s theory of thinking vs feeling

I’ve written about introverts and extroverts in my article Introverts and Extroverts: What’s the Difference?, which talks about where you get your energy from.
The next step in understanding yourself and others is to work out how you make decisions. Do you use primarily cold hard logic, or are you guided by your feelings and how they affect people?
According to Carl Jung, a psychoanalyst from the 1900s, people are either thinking types or feeling types. We are spread evenly over the population, fifty percent thinking types and fifty percent feeling types.
“Where wisdom reigns there is not conflict between thinking and feeling.” — Carl Jung.
The thinking/feeling dichotomy is one of the constituents of the well known Myers Briggs Type Indicator test (MBTI). Isabel Briggs Myers developed the test based on Jung’s work.
So what does it all mean?
Thinking types
Thinkers use facts, concepts, and ideas to make decisions. They shut down any connection to feelings or values.
If you are a thinking type, you will make decisions objectively using:
- Logic
- Truth
- Justice
- Evidence
- Consistency
- Accepted standards
- Facts
Feeling types
Feelers are concerned with emotions and how a decision fits in with values and affects people.
If you are a feeling type, you make decisions subjectively using:
- Values
- Love
- Mercy
- Harmony
- Praise
- Personal situations
- How things affect individuals
How thinking and feeling types approach tasks
“We cannot safely assume that other people’s minds work on the same principles as our own. All too often, others with whom we come in contact do not reason as we reason or do not value the things we value, or are not interested in what interests us.” — Isabel Briggs Myers.
A few years ago, I was on a course studying thinking and feeling types. After being split into our respective groups of thinkers and feelers, we were given a task.
Task: The office will be relocated to another building. Plan the move.
Off we went with the others of our type and had twenty minutes to work it all out.
Then, of course, we reported back to the room.
The office move according to the thinking types
This was an eye-opener to me as a feeling type. It was all about facts, logic, and numbers. What’s the budget? How much money can we save? How many desks? When is the best time for a move for the business?
Teams were plonked down according to numbers and pods of desks available. If there was a team of four, they got put in a pod of four. Things were decided by logic and fit.
There was no requirement to communicate anything to the staff until necessary. The thinking types’ stance was that people don’t need to know anything until they have to do something.
The office move according to the feeling types
My group approached things very differently. Our main concern was the effect of the office move on the staff. How could we make it easier for them? What dates would be least disruptive, taking into account school holidays? We thought there should be lots of communication upfront, so people didn’t get stressed.
We feelers spent a long time worrying about where people would sit. Would the single admin person be lonely? Would finance be disturbed by the noisy operations people if we put them side-by-side? Who had access to windows? Was anyone crammed in by the toilet? Would people near the kitchen be disturbed by the noise of chatter and the smell of food?
We spent hardly any time talking about a budget. I think we may have even missed it off.
How the de-brief went
I’ve worked with some wonderful people, so the de-brief between the two types was hilarious. We found each other’s point of view so different as to be ludicrous.
We felt the thinkers were heartless monsters, and I seem to remember they called us tree-hugging hippies.
Indeed, there were robust responses to our pleas to think about how changes would affect the people. For example, “They’ll put up with where we’ve put them — they are here to work, not look out the window.”
These are two very different approaches. It’s confusing working with your opposite if you don’t know about decision-making types.
How to use this knowledge
“Half our mistakes in life arise from feeling where we ought to think, and thinking where we ought to feel.” — John Churton Collins
The thinking/feeling continuum is to help us understand ourselves and others rather than label us. Everyone can change if we need to and practice a different way of being.
For example, in my various leadership roles, I had to consider budgets, costs, and logistics of releasing staff. I had to grow this skill because it was needed in my job.
We spent hardly any time talking about a budget. I think we may have even missed it off.
Similarly, thinking types in leadership roles may have to consider more personal considerations when leading their teams.
Firstly, know what decision-making type you are and then find out what type other people are. Use this information for discussion and mutual understanding.
In this YouTube clip, the presenter explains that thinking and feeling types are spread equally between males and females. Societal norms may lead us to expect females to be feelers and males to be thinkers, however, this is not correct.

