avatarScott Anthony

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

5582

Abstract

alcoholics, for reasons yet obscure, have lost the power of choice in drink. Our so-called will power becomes practically nonexistent. We are unable, at certain times, to bring into our consciousness with sufficient force the memory of the suffering and humiliation of even a week or a month ago. We are without defense against the first drink.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="b97c"><p>~ The Big Book, page 24.</p></blockquote><p id="2733">I mumbled something about doing more therapy sessions to stay in touch with my baseline feelings, but my new sponsor was having none of it.</p><p id="e1c9">‘This isn’t an emotional issue!’ he said, cutting in. ‘This is a memory issue that no amount of therapy you chose to throw money at will solve.’</p><p id="1800">He even suggested that the mental blank spot could be similar to a form of amnesia or dementia that science hasn’t picked up on yet.</p><p id="4ad6">‘But why hasn’t science picked up on it?’ I asked, holding the phone tightly.</p><p id="26fb">‘Probably because this blank spot only happens at certain times. Most of the time, it lays dormant.’ he replied before warning,</p><p id="337a">‘And unfortunately, this dormancy feature gives us an illusion of power. We think we’ve got sobriety now because our memory and willpower function normally again. Until, the condition randomly comes back online, and we relapse, leaving us totally baffled as to why it happened.’</p><p id="a3e9">My new sponsor sighed deeply.</p><p id="f455">‘It’s heartbreaking,’ he said softly. ‘Especially if you’ve relapsed after being multiple years clean. But it is sadly needed to show you that you are genuinely powerless, regardless of how much you desire and want to be sober.’</p><p id="969d">My head was spinning. Every sentence felt like the jolt of an electric cattle prod.</p><p id="8e0a">Later that day, I looked back at my recent relapses. I found no real conscious memory of consequences before any of them.</p><p id="352f">It appeared relapse was happening to me, not by me.</p><blockquote id="8aba"><p>As soon as I regained my ability to think, I went carefully over that evening in Washington. Not only had I been off guard, I had made no fight whatever against the first drink. This time I had not thought of the consequences at all. I had commenced to drink as carelessly as though the cocktails were ginger ale. I now remembered what my alcoholic friends had told me, how they prophesied that if I had an alcoholic mind, the time and place would come — I would drink again. They had said that though I did raise a defense, it would one day give way before some trivial reason for having a drink. Well, just that did happen and more, for what I had learned of alcoholism did not occur to me at all. I knew from that moment that I had an alcoholic mind. I saw that will power and self-knowledge would not help in those strange mental blank spots. I had never been able to understand people who said that a problem had them hopelessly defeated. I knew then. It was a crushing blow.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="93f7"><p>~ The Big Book, page 41.</p></blockquote><figure id="7922"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/0*n4r4HuNFWSnCD_WU"><figcaption>Photo by <a href="https://unsplash.com/@alicealinari?utm_source=medium&amp;utm_medium=referral">Alice Alinari</a> on <a href="https://unsplash.com?utm_source=medium&amp;utm_medium=referral">Unsplash</a></figcaption></figure><h2 id="287c">A Belief That It Will All Be Alright.</h2><p id="baea">Sadly, the ‘blank spot’ wasn’t all that was happening.</p><p id="7c3e">My new sponsor later explained that something else was happening in my mind, a kind of twisting of my thinking that I couldn’t see either.</p><p id="02a0">This is the other main feature of the relapse condition.</p><p id="da70">The Big Book explains it as follows:</p><blockquote id="f067"><p>But there was always the curious mental phenomenon that parallel with our sound reasoning, there inevitably ran some insanely trivial excuse for taking the first drink. Our sound reasoning failed to hold us in check. The insane idea won out.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="4ad8"><p>~ The Big Book, page 37.</p></blockquote><p id="da58">Anytime the ‘good idea’ of relapsing suddenly popped into my head, part of me would start to minimise the lunacy of this thought.</p><p id="e2c7">I would begin to rationalise this catastrophic idea with excuses and reasons why it would be, in fact, okay to relapse despite being in recovery.</p><p id="432a">No matter how insignificant and non-sensical those reasons were, they quickly became plausible and seemingly rational.</p><p id="6997">At the same time, the urge to want to relapse would start to surge.</p><p id="cdc4">A fear of missing out would relentlessly come crashing in like waves rolling in and out of my consciousness.</p><p id="b225">Thoughts and narratives of why it would be okay this time would dominate my thinking.</p><p id="fe2d">Finally, a tidal wave of justification would smother me into deep unconsciousness.</p><p id="c65b">Convinced of my rationale, I would carry out my plan, only to revert back to type and do everything I said I wouldn’t do, and again, find myself powerless to stop once I started.</p><p id="34a2">This twisted thinking was nothing more than a lie, but I believed the lie and didn’t see the flaw in the logic in light of my track record with partying.</p><p id="888a">To any average person, this kind of thinking and decision-making would be termed irrational, unsound, or even insa

Options

ne.</p><p id="d880">The Big Book calls this thinking an <i>‘obsession to beat the game’</i>.</p><p id="9087">Whether it’s a vague idea that this time it would be different, that I would do it differently and party like a gentleman.</p><p id="b075">Or the well-loved excuse that this will be my last relapse. After this final time, I’ll be done for good. I’ll get on with my life.</p><p id="be67">But, it never was different and that last time never did happen.</p><p id="149d">My new sponsor would remind me often,</p><p id="a62b" type="7">‘You aren’t changing your mind when you’ve decided to give in and party; your mind has been changed for you.’</p><h2 id="4c19">It Centers In Our Minds</h2><p id="f0e7">Of course, there is a body element for the addict.</p><p id="86b6">Naturally, as a consequence of the constant extreme usage of powerfully addictive substances and processes that are designed by their very nature to make you want more and more, addicts have developed a sky-high tolerance.</p><p id="2d70">But there’s this annihilation approach to our acting out and using once we start, which the Big Book describes as the <i>‘phenomenon of craving’</i>.</p><p id="01c2">In the Doctor’s opinion in the Big Book, Dr. Silkworth calls the phenomenon of craving an ‘allergy’, but my new sponsor wasn’t too keen on that idea.</p><p id="10af" type="7">‘If it’s an allergy, then why doesn’t the phenomenon of craving happen every time?’</p><p id="ae75">Regardless of whether it is an allergy, the body part becomes irrelevant, as most people with a severe peanut allergy don’t tend to keep repeating the total lost cause of trying to have another peanut to see if they will react differently.</p><p id="2e48">They don’t touch or go anywhere near peanuts because they remember how terrible it was last time.</p><p id="436a">Once or twice is enough.</p><p id="3796">Not so with the real addict because of the first two features of the disease; they will not only be back gorging on peanuts, but they will eventually take up residence in a peanut factory.</p><blockquote id="e3f6"><p>There is a complete failure of the kind of defence that keeps one from putting his hand on a hot stove. The alcoholic may say to himself in the most casual way, “It won’t burn me this time, so here’s how!” Or perhaps he doesn’t think at all.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="d5e6"><p>~ The Big Book, page 24.</p></blockquote><p id="5cb9">That’s why the Big Book says the real problem ‘centers in our mind’, not our bodies.</p><p id="22d4">‘What will happen now,’ my new sponsor forewarned, ‘as the relapses get worse, the time between them will get shorter and shorter.’</p><p id="6f0b">This condition is progressive.</p><p id="e8f1">Therefore, the blanking and twisting will naturally grow in scope and reach until you can no longer differentiate the true from the false.</p><h2 id="869b">Turning To Something Else</h2><p id="922a">If you believe in the disease concept of addiction, that this is a disease, a fatal illness precisely like any other life-threatening condition, then you have it for life.</p><p id="a2d8">There is <b>nothing </b>you can do to change that.</p><p id="d5f6">If you constantly can’t remember why or how you relapsed despite your honest desire not to.</p><p id="9aaf">Or if you continually relapse, believing some trivial reason or silly excuse to relapse while dismissing the genuine consequences, then you are a real addict.</p><p id="a47a">You have this relapse condition.</p><p id="840d">You <b>crossed a threshold </b>where, at certain times, your inability to use reasoning and rational thinking won’t even register for you.</p><p id="d8c6">The tragic truth is that once that threshold has been crossed, you have <b>no choice</b> but to relapse.</p><p id="0564">A compromised part of your brain will always fire the thought of using or acting out. That will never change. It’s wired like that for life.</p><p id="5fb0">There is no cure.</p><p id="fcca">Even this information won’t save you, as at certain times, you won’t be able to recall any of it when it matters.</p><p id="7fc5">So, let go of trying to change that.</p><p id="59f9">Let go of any old ideas around fighting it and instead get out of the way and <b>trust in something else</b>.</p><p id="b722">After all, that’s all you’ve got.</p><p id="5065">There’s nothing you or anyone else can do to stop this relapse condition.</p><p id="d1dd">But there’s everything you can do about everything else.</p><p id="5e51">There’s everything you can do about building a <b>spiritual dimension</b> to your life, by giving back, helping others, living in genuine faith and trusting in something greater than you.</p><p id="3096">There’s everything you can do to improve your awareness and intuition, raise your consciousness and develop another part of your brain.</p><p id="7598">And let this part of your brain grow bigger and stronger than that addictive part so that it can embrace and look after that compromised part.</p><p id="d2e3">Just like a bigger and wiser older sibling can care for and comfort a much younger upset sibling by giving that stressed child a big hug.</p><p id="da93">There’s everything you can do about deciding to take on a new attitude, direction, and way of life that will keep this condition dormant one day at a time.</p><p id="e415">If this article speaks to you, please follow, share and subscribe to me for more.</p><p id="fc50">Click <a href="https://twitter.com/TheDarrenJames">here</a> to follow me on <a href="https://twitter.com/TheDarrenJames">X</a>.</p></article></body>

A FILM TO REMEMBER: “WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT” (1988)

Photograph of film poster with a display of scene images from “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”.

Before I get into this, I want to make mention “A FILM TO REMEMBER” will be a series about films that have reached a milestone anniversary since their origin in being culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant. The articles will contain the film’s plot outline, director, cast, a compilation of trivialities, various photos, movie trailer, critical reception and more. So, let’s start:

We are here to mark the celebration of the 30th Anniversary of Robert Zemeckis’ “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”. Let’s take an inside look at the film:

PLOT OUTLINE:

Toon star, Roger Rabbit, is worried that his wife Jessica Rabbit is playing patty cake with someone else, so the studio hires detective Eddie Valiant, who happens to hate toons, to snoop on her. But the stakes are quickly raised when Marvin Acme is found dead and Roger is the prime suspect with only the detective Valiant being his only hope to prove his innocence.

Still image of filmmaker Robert Zemeckis.

STUDIO:

Buena Vista Pictures

DIRECTOR:

Robert Zemeckis

CAST:

  • Bob Hoskins … Eddie Valiant
  • Christopher Lloyd … Judge Doom
  • Joanna Cassidy … Dolores
  • Charles Fleischer … Roger Rabbit / Benny The Cab / Greasy / Psycho (voice)
  • Stubby Kaye … Marvin Acme
  • Alan Tilvern … R.K. Maroon
  • Richard LeParmentier … Lt. Santino
  • Lou Hirsch … Baby Herman (voice)
  • Betsy Brantley … Jessica’s Performance Model
  • Joel Silver … Raoul
  • Paul Springer … Augie
  • Richard Ridings … Angelo
  • Edwin Craig … Arthritic Cowboy
  • Lindsay Holiday … Soldier
  • Mike Edmonds … Stretch
  • Morgan Deare … Editor / Gorilla
  • Danny Capri … Kid #1
  • Christopher Hollosy … Kid #2
  • John-Paul Sipla … Kid #3
  • Laura Frances … Blonde Starlet
  • Joel Cutrara … Forensic #1
  • Billy J. Mitchell … Forensic #2
  • Ed Herlihy … Newscaster
  • Eugene Gutierrez … Teddy Valiant
  • April Winchell … Mrs. Herman (voice)
  • Mae Questel … Betty Boop (voice)
  • Mel Blanc … Daffy Duck / Tweety Bird / Bugs Bunny / Sylvester / Porky Pig (voice)
  • Tony Anselmo … Donald Duck (voice)
  • Mary T. Radford … Hippo (voice)
  • Joe Alaskey … Yosemite Sam / Foghorn Leghorn (voice)
  • David L. Lander … Smart Ass (voice)
  • Fred Newman … Stupid (voice)
  • June Foray … Wheezy / Lena Hyena (voice)
  • Russi Taylor … Birds / Minnie Mouse (voice)
  • Les Perkins … Toad (voice)
  • Richard Williams … Droopy (voice)
  • Wayne Allwine … Mickey Mouse (voice)
  • Pat Buttram … Bullet #1 (voice)
  • Jim Cummings … Bullet #2 (voice)
  • Jim Gallant … Bullet #3 (voice)
  • Frank Sinatra … Singing Sword (voice) (archive sound)
  • Tony Pope … Goofy / Wolf (voice)
  • Peter Westy … Pinocchio (voice)
  • Cherry Davis … Woody Woodpecker (voice)
  • Jeff Arbaugh … Mime (uncredited)
  • Nancy Cartwright … Dipped Shoe (voice) (uncredited)
  • Bill Farmer … Goofy (voice) (uncredited)
  • Derek Lyons … Drunk in Bar (uncredited)
  • Mickie McGowan … Mooing Cow / Flying Witch (voice) (uncredited)
  • Clarence Nash … Donald Duck (voice) (archive sound) (uncredited)
  • Philip O’Brien … Earl (uncredited)
  • Mikul Robins … Cloverleaf Billboard Raiser (uncredited)
  • Peter Ross-Murray … Studio Hand (uncredited)
  • Kathleen Turner … Jessica Rabbit (voice) (uncredited)
  • Frank Welker … Dumbo / Additional Voices (voice) (uncredited)

GENRE(S):

Animation | Adventure | Comedy | Crime | Family | Fantasy | Mystery

TAGLINE:

It’s the story of a man, a woman, and a rabbit in a triangle of trouble.

Still image of Alan Tilvern and Bob Hoskins in “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”.

The film is known for being a result from unprecedented cooperation between Warner Bros. and Disney of a murder mystery turned on its very long rabbit ears per se, and a spirited tribute to the magic of animation and laughter. The feats performed by director Robert Zemeckis and director of animation Richard Williams is an ingenious blend of hand-drawn animation and live action, spliced with humor that’s by turns madcap, surreal and violent, all the while, demonstrating that its possible to push the technical boundaries while still cooking up a befitting set of characters and plots. The film is based from Gary K. Wolf’s novel “Who Censored Roger Rabbit?”, it was a critical blockbuster success as it brought in a renewed interest in the Golden Age of American animation, spearheading modern American animation and the Disney Renaissance from this landmark cinematic film.

Here’s what some of the critical receptions have been for the film over the years:

Christy Lemire from ChristyLemire.com says: “What Zemeckis did in blending animated characters in a live-action setting was seamless and super high-tech, and it set the stage for the groundbreaking visual effects that would become his trademark in ambitious films like ‘Forrest Gump’ and ‘The Polar Express.’”

Richard Corliss from TIME Magazine says: “The opening cartoon upstages the movie that emerges from it.”

Carrie Rickey from Philadelphia Inquirer says: “Imagine watching cartoon characters and relating to them as if they were flesh-and-blood instead of paint-and-ink. This is the slap-happy effect of ‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit,’ and — please — a 24-carrot salute to director Robert Zemeckis.”

Gene Siskel from Chicago Tribune says: “This is a movie that demands to be seen twice. The first time, one is likely to be dazzled to the point of exhaustion; the second time, one can appreciate the artistry and good humor more easily.”

Desson Howe from Washington Post says: “A definitive collaboration of pure talent. Zemeckis had Walt Disney Pictures’ enthusiastic backing, producer Steven Spielberg’s pull, Warner Bros.’s blessing, Canadian animator Richard Williams’ ink and paint, Mel Blanc’s voice, Jeffrey Price and Peter S. Seaman’s witty, frenetic screenplay, George Lucas’ Industrial Light and Magic, and Bob Hoskins’ comical performance as the burliest, shaggiest private eye.”

Still image Christopher Lloyd and Bob Hoskins (background, through wall hole) in “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”.

As you can tell by the critical reactions, the film was consensually widely praised despite a few pundits finding themselves annoyed with by the homages to the Golden Age of American animation including animation legend Chuck Jones accused Zemeckis of robbing Williams of any creative input and ruining the piano duel that both Williams and he storyboarded. However, the film has been marked as technical marvel and a definitive collaboration of pure talents in this combination detective noir story, with slightly adult humor, crazy toon characters from both Warner Bros. & Disney’s vaults in a one-off which is unlikely to ever repeat and an overall technical wizardry that yielded a film which set a benchmark precedent in the annals of cinema. But I’ll let you decide…

So, to get a better look at the film, here’s a link to the movie trailer of Robert Zemeckis’ “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”:

Here I have provided 12 interesting and intriguing trivia facts (I wanted to keep it limited) about “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”:

  • Walt Disney Productions purchased the film rights to Gary K. Wolf’s novel “Who Censored Roger Rabbit?” shortly after its publication in 1981. Ron W. Miller, president of Disney at the time, saw it as a perfect opportunity to produce a blockbuster. Jeffrey Price and Peter S. Seaman were hired to write the script, penning two drafts. Robert Zemeckis offered his services as director in 1982, but Disney declined as his two previous films “I Wanna Hold Your Hand” and “Used Cars” had been box-office bombs. Between 1981 and 1983 Disney developed test footage with Darrell Van Citters as animation director, Paul Reubens voicing Roger Rabbit, Peter Renaday as Eddie Valiant, and Russi Taylor as Jessica Rabbit. The project was revamped in 1985 by Michael Eisner, the then-new CEO of Disney. Amblin Entertainment, which consisted of Steven Spielberg, Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy, were approached to produce “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” alongside Disney. The original budget was projected at $50 million, which Disney felt was too expensive. The film was finally green-lit when the budget decreased to $30 million, which at the time still made it the most expensive animated film ever green-lit.
  • After the film was green-lit, Walt Disney Studios chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg argued that the hybrid of live action and animation would “save” Disney’s animation department. Steven Spielberg’s contract included an extensive amount of creative control and a large percentage of the box-office profits. Disney kept all merchandising rights. Spielberg convinced Warner Bros., Fleischer Studios, King Features Syndicate, Felix the Cat Productions, Turner Entertainment, and Universal Pictures/Walter Lantz Productions to “lend” their characters to appear in the film with (in some cases) stipulations on how those characters were portrayed; for example, Disney’s Donald Duck and Warner’s Daffy Duck appear as equally talented dueling pianists, and Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny also share a scene. Apart from this agreement, Warner Bros. and the various other companies were not involved in the production of the film. Additionally, the producers were unable to acquire the rights to use of Popeye, Tom and Jerry, Little Lulu, Casper the Friendly Ghost, or the Terrytoons for appearances from their respective owners (King Features, Turner, Western Publishing, Harvey Comics, and Viacom).
  • Terry Gilliam was offered the chance to direct, but he found the project too technically challenging. Gilliam later admitted saying, “Pure laziness on my part. I completely regret that decision.” Robert Zemeckis was hired to direct in 1985, based on the success of “Romancing the Stone” and “Back to the Future.” Disney executives were continuing to suggest Darrell Van Citters to direct the animated sequences, but Spielberg and Zemeckis decided against it. Richard Williams was eventually hired to direct the animation. Zemeckis wanted the film to imbue “Disney’s high quality of animation, Warner Bros.’ characterization, and Tex Avery humor”.
  • This film marked the only time cartoon characters from Walt Disney and Warner Brothers appeared together on-screen.
  • The three ingredients of the dip that kills toons (turpentine, acetone, and benzene) are all paint thinners, which are used to remove animation from cels.
  • Harrison Ford was Spielberg’s original choice to play Eddie Valiant, but Ford’s price was too high. Bill Murray was also considered for the part, but due to his idiosyncratic method of receiving offers for roles, Murray missed out on it. Eddie Murphy reportedly turned down the role of Eddie, which he later came to regret. Several other actors were also considered for the role of Eddie Valiant, including Chevy Chase, Robert Redford, Jack Nicholson, Sylvester Stallone, Wallace Shawn, Ed Harris, Charles Grodin, and Don Lane. Bob Hoskins would win out in the end.
Still image of Bob Hoskins and Christopher Lloyd in “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”.
  • To facilitate Hoskins’ performance, Charles Fleischer dressed in a Roger bunny suit and “stood in” behind camera for most scenes. Animation director Williams explained Roger Rabbit was a combination of “Tex Avery’s cashew nut-shaped head, the swatch of red hair…like Droopy’s, Goofy’s overalls, Porky Pig’s bow tie, Mickey Mouse’s gloves, and Bugs Bunny-like cheeks and ears.”
  • Animation director Richard Williams admitted he was “openly disdainful of the Disney bureaucracy” and refused to work in Los Angeles. To accommodate him and his animators, production was moved to Elstree Studios in Hertfordshire, England. Disney and Spielberg also told Williams that in return for doing the film, they would help distribute his uncompleted film “The Thief and the Cobbler.” Supervising animators included Dale Baer, James Baxter, David Bowers, Andreas Deja, Chris Jenkins, Phil Nibbelink, Nik Ranieri, and Simon Wells. The animation production, headed by associate producer Don Hahn, was split between Richard Williams’ London studio and a specialized unit in Los Angeles, set up by Walt Disney Feature Animation and supervised by Dale Baer. The production budget continued to escalate, while the shooting schedule lapsed longer than expected. When the budget reached $40 million, Disney president Michael Eisner seriously considered shutting down production, but Jeffrey Katzenberg talked him out of it. Despite the budget escalating to over $50 million, Disney moved forward on production because they were enthusiastic to work with Spielberg.
  • VistaVision cameras installed with motion-control technology were used for the photography of the live-action scenes which would be composited with animation. Rubber mannequins of Roger Rabbit, Baby Herman, and the weasels would portray the animated characters during rehearsals to teach the actors where to look when acting with “open air and imaginative cartoon characters”. Many of the live-action props held by cartoon characters were shot on set with either robotic arms holding the props or the props were manipulated by strings, similar to a marionette. The actor who played the voice of Roger, Charles Fleischer, insisted on wearing a Roger Rabbit costume while on the set, to get into character. Filming began on December 2, 1986, and lasted for seven months at Elstree Studios, with an additional month in Los Angeles and at Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) for blue screen effects of Toontown. The entrance of Desilu Studios served as the fictional Maroon Cartoon Studio lot.
  • Post-Production lasted for 14 months. Because the film was made before computer animation and digital compositing were widely used, all the animation was done using cels and optical compositing. First, the animators and lay-out artists were given black-and-white printouts of the live-action scenes (known as “photo stats”), and they placed their animation paper on top of them. The artists then drew the animated characters in relationship to the live-action footage. Due to Zemeckis’ dynamic camera moves, the animators had to confront the challenge of ensuring the characters were not “slipping and slipping all over the place.” After rough animation was complete, it was run through the normal process of traditional animation until the cels were shot on the rostrum camera with no background. The animated footage was then sent to ILM for compositing, where technicians animated three lighting layers (shadows, highlights, and tone mattes) separately, to make the cartoon characters look three-dimensional and give the illusion of the characters being affected by the lighting on set. Finally, the lighting effects were optically composited on to the cartoon characters, who were, in turn, composited into the live-action footage. One of the most difficult effects in the film was Jessica’s dress in the nightclub scene, because it had flashing sequins, an effect accomplished by filtering light through a plastic bag scratched with steel wool.
  • The first test audience was composed mostly of eighteen and nineteen-year-olds, who hated it. After nearly the entire audience walked out of the screening, Robert Zemeckis, who had final cut, said he wasn’t changing a thing.
  • Bob Hoskins said that, for two weeks after seeing the movie, his young son wouldn’t talk to him. When finally asked why, his son said he couldn’t believe his father would work with cartoon characters such as Bugs Bunny and not let him meet them.
Still image of Bob Hoskins, Joanna Cassidy and Richard LeParmentier (gray suit) in “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”.

To conclude, Robert Zemeckis’ “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” is an unprecedented collaboration of filmmaking artistry between Warner Bros. & Disney that will unlikely ever happen again in this highly innovative and entertaining film that features a groundbreaking mix of live action and animation, with a touching and original story to boot. The film led an animation renaissance of a Golden Age era at Disney and in modern American animation overall from this high-concept ‘80s popcorn, wondrous blend of exuberantly humorous, brilliantly inventive, bracingly smart and surprisingly moving piece of whimsical ink-and-paint, flesh-and-blood, interacting, technological, cinematic tour de force milestone.

NOTE: The article contains sources from IMDb and Wikipedia.

Follow me and check out other articles of mine:

Movies
History
Trivia
Photos
Movie Trailer
Recommended from ReadMedium