avatarMona Lazar

Summary

A study suggests that countries with smaller reported penis sizes experienced faster economic growth between 1960 and 1985, positing a link between penile length and economic development.

Abstract

The article discusses an unexpected correlation between the size of male genitalia and a country's economic growth rate. According to research by Tatu Westling, nations with men who have smaller penises saw more rapid economic expansion during the period from 1960 to 1985. The article humorously notes the surprise at penises becoming a topic in economic discussions and acknowledges the peculiarity of this finding. Westling offers a Freudian explanation, suggesting that men may compensate for perceived inadequacies in penis size by striving for greater financial success. However, the article also critiques the study's focus on male anatomy, pointing out that women, who make up more than half of the global population, are not accounted for in this theory, which undermines its completeness and potentially its relevance.

Opinions

  • The article expresses amusement at the randomness of penis size becoming a topic in economic discussions.
  • Westling's explanation implies that penis size and financial success are linked through male self-esteem and the desire to compensate.
  • The article criticizes the study for its incomplete perspective, as it neglect

What Came First: The Small Penis or the Big Money?

Having a big penis keeps your country poor.

Photo by Anima Visual on Unsplash

Oops! They did it again! Much to our surprise (or is it?) penises managed to shove themselves into yet another unrelated subject: economic growth!

When you consider the factors that influence the growth of a country, what comes to mind first? Some would say social and political resources, technological innovation, or natural resources.

Wrong! It’s penile length!

Having a big penis keeps your country poor.

According to this study conducted by Tatu Westling of The University of Helsinki and the Helsinki Center of Economic Research (HECER), between 1960 and 1985, countries that reported a smaller penis size grew at a faster rate than those with bigger sizes.

Before diving into an explanation as to why that happens, let me allow myself and you a moment to scoff at how randomly weird this world is.

Westling, however, was unfazed by the results of the study and comes up with an explanation even Freud would be proud of.

Penile length, together with earnings, are both key factors in male self-esteem. If you’re doing good on the former, you can relax about the latter.

To put it bluntly, fast economic growth is the equivalent of a big shiny car that you’re parading around town. It’s compensating for something.

Men define themselves by how large their manhood is and if they feel they fall short (pun intended), they try to make it big (pun intended again) in other fields that interest them, like the size of their wallet.

The explanation albeit sad, is not even half bad until you realize that a lot of people don’t have penises.

That’s when the explanation becomes more than a half bad, considering women (the non-penised ones) constitute more than a half of the world population.

A factor that was not taken into consideration and which makes the whole theory not entirely wrong, but definitely incomplete. Flawed. Maybe even negligible.

Oh, my, let’s be careful with our words, because if we get anywhere close to the word “small” in the same sentence as the word “penis”, we’re going to have to compensate for something here, people!

Love this article? Get me a Ko-fi.

Love my writing? Join my e-mail list.

Love reading? Join Medium.

Men
Sexuality
Society
Feminism
Satire
Recommended from ReadMedium