avatarXiao Faria da Cunha

Summary

The article argues that the public's outrage over AI art winning an art contest, NFT bros' controversial acts, and climate protestors defacing art is misdirected, suggesting that these events reflect a broader societal failure in appreciating true artistic value and craftsmanship.

Abstract

The author of the article expresses a deep concern over the current state of art appreciation, pointing out that the recent uproar over AI-generated art winning prestigious art contests and the destructive actions of NFT enthusiasts are symptoms of a larger institutional and societal failure. The piece underscores the importance of recognizing the artistic merit and craftsmanship behind traditional art forms, which may be overshadowed by the novelty of AI creations and the sensationalism of controversial acts. It also criticizes the juries and judges for their role in evaluating art and the public's dwindling ability to discern between good and bad art. The author posits that this collective failure to maintain high standards for art appreciation is leading society towards an idiocratic state, where the distinction between true artistry and mere pretense is blurred.

Opinions

  • AI art is not the enemy but rather a tool that can expand the possibilities for artists; the real issue is the failure of art competition juries to discern artistic value.
  • The author believes that the population at large has lost the ability to appreciate art, and those with critical eyes are hesitant to voice their opinions.
  • There is a concern that society is becoming an idiocracy, where the inability to distinguish between high-quality and low-quality art leads to the veneration of undeserving individuals.
  • The article suggests that the problem lies not with individuals like NFT bros or protestors, but with the societal lack of respect for art and the overinflated sense of entitlement as artists without the proper skill or contribution.
  • The author emphasizes that the true issue is the collective cultivation of ignorance and disrespect towards art, which has led to the current state of affairs where the value of artistic excellence is diminished.

We are Angry at The Wrong People

Photo by DeepMind on Unsplash

A.I. art won first prize at a privileged art contest, and the crowd is furious. NFT bro burns ten-million Frida Kalo sketch — what an unforgivable crime. Climate protestors defile master paintings in museums to create controversy, and a few of us thought: what a pity that hurting people is illegal.

But what if I tell you we’re all yelling at the wrong people?

Don’t get me wrong. I am as furious as you’re at the fact such absurdity is happening. Nonetheless, should we regard these incidents as individual misfortunes, or an institutional failure (if not our failure at a species level)? Do these (and many others yet known to us) not indicate a disrespect for artistic excellence and craftsmanship in general?

In my previous essay about A.I. art, I made a clear statement that A.I. is nothing but another tool that brings artists more possibilities. And that statement remains valid. The tools are not what’s driving non-AI artists into a corner: just like the generated images didn’t nominate themselves the award.

If anything, we should be more concerned by the pathetic fact that the juries and judges at an art competition failed to properly evaluate the artistic value behind an A.I. generated conceptual sketch vs. that of a piece of art demonstrating the artist’s knowledge, ideas, and craftsmanship, which inevitably casts light onto another problem:

The majority of our population has lost their art appreciation ability.

It’s not like A.I. art and NFT bros are the first thing that slapped diligent, hardworking artists who actually dedicated themselves to advancing their techniques and artistic abilities. What is the difference between a self-proclaimed A.I. artist and someone who throws paint onto a canvas and calls it an abstract painting? And what is the difference between the judge who lets a computer program wins the award, and the audience who chases after those paint-throwers like they’re kings and queens?

Let’s face it. On a large scale, our population has lost the ability to tell good art from bad ones. Those who do possess critical eyes are often too afraid to bring up the conversation.

But here’s the problem:

Everyone is an artist. But there are still good and bad artists. The moment we refuse to identify the betters, the more advanced, the further developed, the finer crafted, the moment we set ourselves up for idiocy.

And an idiocratic society is destined to create arrogant morons, oblivious tyrants, and entitled bullies.

So let’s face it.

NFT bros aren’t the problem. The problem is the lacking of the ability to show art respect.

Protestors aren’t the problem. The problem is the absence of fear and guilt that should have stopped anyone from destroying a master painting that survived through centuries of turmoil.

A.I. artists aren’t the problem. The problem is how we all so shamelessly claim ourselves to be artists, writers, and visionaries.

We sow the seeds of ignorance and disrespect. Now, we are harvesting the venomous fruit they grew.

AI
Ai Art
Midjourney
Art
Data Driven Fiction
Recommended from ReadMedium