avatarOscar Rhea

Summary

The author expresses a strong dislike for the reality TV show "Vanderpump Rules," criticizing its portrayal of toxic femininity and lack of educational or entertainment value.

Abstract

In a scathing review, the author reluctantly describes their experience of being subjected to an episode of "Vanderpump Rules," a reality TV show centered around the lives of waitstaff at a restaurant. The author, who has been exposed to a series of similar reality shows, finds "Vanderpump Rules" to be particularly distasteful, likening it to a colonoscopy and describing it as the television equivalent of consuming something repulsive. The show is depicted as a celebration of depravity, vanity, and malice, with the author questioning the appeal of watching such content. Drawing from personal experience working in the restaurant industry, the author asserts that the show does not accurately reflect real-life dynamics and instead amplifies negative stereotypes. The piece concludes with the author invoking a "veto" against watching further episodes, preferring to endure almost anything else.

Opinions

  • "Vanderpump Rules" is described as an abomination and the worst of reality TV, offering a noxious and inaccurate representation of the restaurant industry.
  • The author believes that the show glorifies toxic behavior, particularly toxic femininity, and lacks any redeeming qualities such as hope, inspiration, or joy.
  • The article suggests that the appeal of the show, if any, might be rooted in viewers' vicarious consumption of the cast's negative traits and behaviors.
  • The author expresses a preference for almost any other activity or form of entertainment over watching another episode of "Vanderpump Rules," including participating in experimental acupuncture or spending time in a Starbucks bathroom.
  • The piece hyperbolically suggests that watching the cast interact with electrical sockets would be more entertaining than the actual show, highlighting the author's deep aversion to its content.

Reality TV is Awful

Vanderpump Ghouls

Surviving forty-three minutes of toxic femininity

It’s quite rare when a sarcastic quip and a photo credit can be contained in a single word. Photo Credit: Bravo.

Act like an imbecile. They’ll love you for it.

Against my will, I have now watched the first episode of the first season of Vanderpump Rules.

In my house, the TV remote goes back and forth. First, I pick a thoroughly entertaining, moderately educational television program with stellar acting and a strong directorial vision that both my girlfriend and I will enjoy. Then the lady that tricked me into falling in love with her makes me sit through the television equivalent of a colonoscopy.

I’ve seen a lot of shit. In the last two months I’ve sat through Love is Blind, The Ultimatum, and MILF Manor — but Vanderpump Rules takes the cake. Then, once it has the cake, this reality TV abomination switches out the icing for mustard, shakes a slice around in Ziploc bag full of sewage water, and squeezes the putrid, soggy mush into my ear canals.

What would I rather do than watch episode two? I suppose I’d prefer to:

Participate in experimental eyeball acupuncture. Raise a saltwater crocodile in my apartment. Spend twenty-four hours locked in a Starbucks bathroom. French kiss my father. Swallow all the feathers out of the only pillow I actually like.

Halfway through the first episode — just as Scheana was polishing the glassware that Stassi was supposed to be polishing (spoiler alert: Scheana doesn’t take it in stride) — I made a sincere attempt to understand why anyone would watch petulant actresses pretend to be incompetent waitresses.

Am I supposed to glory in their depravity? Should their vanity make me feel better about my own narcissism? Do I just stare at the tits until it’s over?

What am I doing here?

So Stassi is Putin and Kristen is Zelenksy? Credit: Imgur.com

Vanderpump Rules can’t even claim to be a gruesome slice of life. I’ve worked in the restaurant industry for over twenty years. If the atmosphere in any dive bar I’ve tended had ever been as noxious as Sur — the restaurant in the show — I would have run away and actually made something of myself. I could have been a telemarketer; or an endangered species semen extractor; or the guy who scrubs the inside of septic tanks — and I’d have done it all with a smile on my face, knowing the alternative was to spend my days in the proximity of those snotty, malicious termagants.

The best I can figure it, Vanderpump Rules is designed for the vicarious consumption of toxic femininity. It is epitome trashy TV — and trashy TV never yearns for redemption. Who needs a protagonist? Who needs hope, inspiration, joy? Just shove a gaggle of harlots into a room full of electrical sockets, give them each a fork, and tell them they can’t come out until sparks fly.

Actually, that I might watch.

Who will be the lucky socket? (Image via Instagram doctored by author)

Every so often I get to exercise a veto. The veto is a high-risk measure, akin to going nuclear. I can’t veto everything I don’t like — that leads to the mutually assured destruction of sleeping in separate bedrooms.

Still, I can’t go on. My sanity won’t stand for it. I simply must . . .

VETO!

VETO! VETO! VETO! Play anything else. A beheading video; German kaka porn; that tape of my grandmother being tortured by Idi Amin that we usually save for Christmas Eve. I’ll happily watch paint dry on the backs of my own eye sockets.

Just please, for the love of God: Turn these bimbos off!

Enjoyed yourself? Then read this, Stupid:

Check out this piece on firearms and fireworks by Phillip T Stephens:

Vanderpump Rules
Reality TV
Nonsense
Funny
TV Shows
Recommended from ReadMedium
avatarAlex Praytor
Seasons of Change

Winter tales

9 min read