avatarJane Harris

Summary

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's revocation of the Emergencies Act demonstrates Canada's robust democratic process, refuting claims of dictatorship and emphasizing the effectiveness of established legal frameworks in addressing civil unrest.

Abstract

The article addresses the criticism faced by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, particularly from American right-wing pundits, who labeled him a dictator amidst the "Freedom Convoy" protests. The revocation of the Emergencies Act, which was invoked to deal with the illegal blockades and unrest caused by the protests, indicates that Canada's parliamentary system is functioning effectively. The decision to revoke the act was made after it became clear that existing criminal laws were sufficient to handle the situation. The article highlights the active role of opposition parties, the support of the public for police action, and the checks and balances within the Canadian parliamentary system, including the Senate's role as a 'house of sober second thought.' The government's actions, including freezing bank accounts linked to the protests and stopping foreign funding, were targeted and temporary, reinforcing the claim that Canada remains a healthy democracy.

Opinions

  • The author suggests that concerns about Trudeau being a dictator are unfounded, as the revocation of the Emergencies Act shows a responsive and accountable government.
  • The article implies that the protests were not entirely representative of the trucking community, with some participants shielding a more radical agenda.
  • It is noted that the majority of Canadians, including the Conservative Premier of Alberta, did not support the illegal blockades and were in favor of police intervention.
  • The author points out that the Emergencies Act provided necessary tools to law enforcement without leading to martial law or suppressing legitimate dissent.
  • The article criticizes foreign right-wing pundits and conspiracy theorists for mischaracterizing the situation in Canada as totalitarian.
  • The author emphasizes that the Canadian system, with its checks and balances, is working as intended, with the Prime Minister and his government being held accountable by Parliament and the public.
  • The article suggests that the handling of the crisis, including the revocation of the Emergencies Act, will likely influence the next federal election's outcome.

Trudeau a Dictator? Revoking Emergencies Act Proves He’s Not

Thank you for your concern, America, but Parliament is wide awake and Canadian democracy is healthier than it’s been in years.

PM Trudeau announces end of National Emergency 23 February 2022. Photo by Author. Credit Jane Harris

Note: My follow up article on radicalization of churches and American influence in Canada’s Truckers’ Convoys has turned into a series. Part one:

Today the Governor General of Canada proclaimed revocation of the 14 February Declaration of National Emergency at the request of the Prime Minister. Why? It is now clear that criminal law will address illegal activities of the so-called Freedom Convoy. The Emergency Act is not needed.

Jagmeet Singh, leader of the NDP, whose party reluctantly supported continuation of the Declaration of National Emergency in the House of Commons Monday night (21 February) promised to join the Conservatives and Bloc Quebecois in opposing the Emergency if that happened. The Conservatives planned to put the matter before Parliament again next week. Losing that vote or the looming Senate vote, might have sent Justin Trudeau off to Rideau Hall to tell the Governor General he could no longer govern.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau remains, some would argue deservedly, at the mercy of a fractious Parliament watching his every move.

This debunks assertions of American right wing pundits and conspiracy theorists (some home grown) that Canadians live in a totalitarian state where we pay allegiance to the leader of People Kind, Justin Trudeau.

Contrary to what many in the foreign press thought, most protesters were not truckers and some convoy leaders called for an end to democratic rule. Participants with legitimate concerns, often unemployed or recruited from faith communities, were there to shield a darker agenda. (I will address this in a future article.)

Canadians Never Supported Occupations or Illegal Barricades

Even the Conservative Premier of Alberta, Jason Kenney, who opposed invoking The Emergencies Act and continues to call for an end to US and Canadian federal vaccine requirements for cross-boarder truckers, opposed the barricades and asked for federal help to end the protests. In fact, two thirds of Canadians supported military action to remove protesters at border crossings and in downtown Ottawa. That never happened. Instead police cleared the barricades after activists were given the opportunity to leave peacefully without charges.

Parliament missed one day of debate because of police action, but invoking the Emergencies Act did not prevent the Opposition from doing their job. Members on both sides of the House of Commons were more animated than they have been in months as they debated the passage of the Act. At one point some MPs, including the Prime Minister, got so rowdy, the Speaker chastised them. Even Liberal MPs criticized the Prime Minister’s handling of the crisis. This how a Westminster Parliamentary System is supposed to work.

The influx of money from foreign crowd funding sites to the illegal blockades was stopped, but the Government did not permanently close bank accounts of Canadians engaged in legitimate dissent.

The RCMP states that frozen accounts affected ‘influencers in the illegal protest in Ottawa, and owners and/or drivers of vehicles who did not want to leave the area impacted by the protest. At no time, did we (The RCMP) provide a list of donors to financial institutions.’ Most of these accounts are in the process of being unfrozen. (I will address this in a future article.)

Canada was never under Martial Law.

On 14 February The Emergencies Act was enacted to give law enforcement additional tools to clear blockades and end the flow of foreign money. The Act took effect immediately, but required votes in the House of Commons and the Senate to remain in effect for up to 30 days. (Under the Act a motion must be presented to Parliament within seven days of an Emergency Declaration. An Emergency ends in 30 days automatically unless Parliament extends it.)

The motion, approved by the House of Commons by a vote of 185 to 151 on 21 February, was being debated in the Senate when the National State of Emergency ended this afternoon (23 February).

Televised Emergencies Act Vote Feb 21, 202 in Canadian House of Commons, by the author, Credit Jane Harris

As required by the Act, a Special Joint Committee of the House of Commons and Senate must be struck to review the Declaration of Emergency and any orders or regulations attached to it. The Emergency Declaration is also subject to an Inquiry that will report to both Houses of Parliament. (The appointed Canadian Senate serves as a ‘house of sober second thought’ like the UK House of Lords.)

The contents of those reports and the outcomes of court challenges to the Act could swing the next election. Minority governments generally don’t last more than a couple of years before they either lose a Confidence Vote in Parliament or the PM seeks a new mandate.

Ultimately, Canadian voters will issue the final verdict on Prime Minister Trudeau and this Parliament. No foreign crowdfunding or pundits required. That’s how our democratic institutions work.

-30-

Canada
Politics
Creativity
Democracy
Protest
Recommended from ReadMedium
avatarDr. Samantha Rodman Whiten (Dr. Psych Mom)
My Wife Is Fat

Reader Wife Is Fat writes:

8 min read