avatarEP McKnight, MEd

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

4362

Abstract

re their encounters and engage with a global audience. Channels like “Audit the Audit,” “News Now Houston,” and “High Desert Community Watch” have gained substantial followings, with millions of views on their videos. These auditors have become celebrities within the YouTube community, attracting both supporters and critics.</p><p id="a3fd">One prominent example of First Amendment audits in action can be found in the following YouTube video :</p> <figure id="67f2"> <div> <div> <img class="ratio" src="http://placehold.it/16x9"> <iframe class="" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FDT2baYDdt8s%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DDT2baYDdt8s&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FDT2baYDdt8s%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="480" width="854"> </div> </div> </figure></iframe></div></div></figure><p id="3b1b">In my personal view, despite the unprofessional response from the police officer in this video, the auditor seemed to be excessively provoking them. This behavior is somewhat perplexing and, in my opinion, unacceptable. It is crucial to remember that even though First Amendment audits serve a significant purpose in maintaining governmental accountability and educating the public about their constitutional rights, there should be a level of respect and understanding maintained during these interactions. Extreme provocation can potentially cloud the intended message and purpose of these audits, creating unnecessary tension and conflict.</p><figure id="621a"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="8ea1">First Amendment Audits Legal Controversies</h1><p id="13d7">First Amendment auditors have sparked debates about the boundaries of free speech and the role of citizens in holding public officials accountable. Supporters argue that these audits promote transparency and government accountability, while critics question the motives of auditors and the potential disruption they may cause.</p><p id="20fa">The legality of First Amendment audits is a subject of as being said before is in ongoing debate. While auditors argue that they are exercising their constitutional rights, law enforcement agencies have raised concerns about potential interference with police operations and public safety. Courts have grappled with balancing the right to record in public spaces with legitimate law enforcement interests.</p><p id="88d3">In light of the ongoing debate surrounding the legality and appropriateness of First Amendment audits, it’s beneficial to seek insight from experts in the field. One such voice on Medium.com belongs to <a href="undefined">Kemal M. Lepschoq, LL.M. 👨🏻‍🎓⚖️</a>; while I do not have expertise in the law field, I think lawyers like Kemal could provide a valuable perspective on this complex issue more than me.</p><figure id="d1df"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="84e6">The Role of the First Amendment on Free Speech</h1><p id="0c34">Some argue that First Amendment audits are essential for preserving and promoting free speech rights, as they serve as a check on government power. However, others contend that auditors’ confrontational tactics and the potential for escalations may undermine the public’s perception of genuine free speech advocacy.</p><p id="21db">While First Amendment audits may be well-intentioned, there is growing concern that they may unintentionally foster a societal attitude of mistrust toward law enforcement. These audits, while promoting transparency, can inadvertently send a message that all law enforcement actions are suspect. This could potentially lead the public to form a negative or adversarial view of police officers and other officials, undermining their authority and complicating their efforts to maintain public safety.</p><p id="7144">It’s important to note that the concept of First Amendment audits is relatively new and not thoroughly r

Options

esearched or studied. Therefore, while it stands as a potent tool for exercising constitutional rights, its broader implications on society’s perception of law enforcement and public safety need careful examination and thoughtful discussion.</p><figure id="311e"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="9f57">First Amendment Audits & Digital Media</h1><p id="2f05">As First Amendment audits continue to gain attention, their future in the digital media landscape remains uncertain. YouTube’s evolving policies, legal challenges, and public sentiment will play a significant role in shaping the direction of these audits. It is likely that we will see continued discussions regarding the balance between constitutional rights and public safety concerns.</p><p id="c0df">My hope is for the auditors to recognize the collective impression they create and the consequential societal impact. While these audits seem to be a legitimate exercise of civil liberties, they also contribute significantly to shaping public opinion. Therefore, a measure of caution and responsibility is necessary.</p><p id="25f3">Auditors should be mindful of the potential for their activities to inadvertently cast law enforcement in an adversarial light, fostering an environment of mistrust. My hope is, therefore, that they will exercise their rights with a balanced approach, recognizing the weight of their contributions to public opinion and the need for this practice to be judiciously monitored and controlled.</p><figure id="d641"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="6258">Conclusion</h1><p id="77dc">First Amendment auditors have carved out a unique place on YouTube, captivating audiences with their audacious encounters and challenging the boundaries of free speech. However, the impact and consequences of these audits extend beyond YouTube, raising important questions about the balance between individual rights, government accountability, and public safety. As the digital media landscape continues to evolve, the future of First Amendment audits remains uncertain. Only time will tell how this trend will shape the broader discourse on free speech and citizen engagement with those in power.</p><p id="cadf">I firmly believe that while we need to address the issue of police misconduct, it is important that our methods do not exacerbate the problem. Police officers are as susceptible to stress and mental health issues as any other citizen. First Amendment auditors pushing law enforcement officers too far may not only be counterproductive, but it could also put unnecessary strain on these public servants, who have families and personal lives just like the rest of us. In the pursuit of justice, we must remember to extend empathy and understanding towards all parties involved. It is only by doing so that we can foster a fair and just society.</p><figure id="7625"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="9e53">Author’s Note</h1><p id="320a">Thank you for reading my story. Here is some information about <a href="https://readmedium.com/editorial-bio-of-ali-alzahrani-b78c1a23fcbc?sk=1150094bb674aaa7701f61972f40b86c"><b>my background</b></a>. 🙏Consider sharing and participating in the conversation if this content speaks to you. For any queries, collaborations, or comments, reach out to me at <a href="[email protected]"><b>[email protected]</b></a>. Thank you for supporting my work!</p><div id="c94c" class="link-block"> <a href="https://medium.com/@aaar69member/subscribe"> <div> <div> <h2>Get an email whenever Ali Alzahrani, Editor publishes.</h2> <div><h3>Get an email whenever Ali Alzahrani, Editor publishes. By signing up, you will create a Medium account if you don't…</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/0*hM3RhYQ7aRYMopVt)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div></article></body>

Transparency and Accountability Comes to Bakersfield Police Department

How the attorney general sees the need and demands change to a troubled police department

Photo by Noah Berger/AP

Around the country, several attorney generals are stepping up to the plate demanding much needed change to their police system that is wreaked with lots of injustices, racism, and excessive use of force.

California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, (above photo), has made it his charge in demanding police reform in the Bakersfield police department after citing civil rights violations that required comprehensive reforms by the city and its police force.

This is the result of a five-year, (2016), investigation regarding accusations of excessive force, stops of minorities, and practices involving the use of police canines. The irony here, the police ill-practices were orchestrated against people of color, in general.

Photo by Sean Lee on Unsplash

Sadly but a reality, for centuries and mostly without justification other than skin color, Black and white men are treated differently during arrest or during any type of interactions starting from their tone, degrading demeanor and total void of respect is inevitable herald toward Black men, unlike white men. Often their tone bespeaks of their disdain for Black men versus white men.

Along with the attorney general, the city leaders have joined forces for the reformation of the police department after findings conveyed that Bakersfield police officers failed to uniformly and adequately enforce the law that gave rise to pattern or practice of systemic racism deprived residents of their constitutional protections where unreasonable force, unwarranted stops, searches, arrests, and seizures occurred.

Overall, the police department inadequately enforced the law. Bakersfield’s police department ranked for police killings, the ninth in the country and California’s second-highest city.

During unwarranted traffic stops by the Bakersfield police, there was found to be the use of deadly force against those with mental health issues. Where is humanity here or honoring the badge to protect and serve? Their actions violated state and/or federal laws in the use of excessive force.

Another area where the Bakersfield Police department was lacking, they allowed the police department to take advantage of the disadvantage, failed to provide adequate access to police services for people who had limited usage of English, and failed to maintain program needed to address civilian complaints, and lacked a comprehensive community policing program.

Clearly, this is indicative of a police department that needs a much-needed revamping and/or restructuring where accountability and transparency will prevail. Thanks to the attorney general of Bakersfield, these ill practices by these out-of-control Bakersfield’s police officers may not stop completely but will be viewed under a microscope moving forward, demanding accountability and transparency.

Unless revamping is demanded outside of the Bakersfield police department, much could continue to fall in the cracks at the demise of people of color. Prior to the attorney general mandate, Bakersfield’s police department had previously instituted three reforms, outfitting officers with body-cameras, volunteered to collect data early under the state’s Racial and Identity Profiling Act, and implemented a community collaboration initiative.

In order for any new practices and policies to be adequately enforced, an outside investigation entity, community policing committee, is required to ensure compliance along with court-enforced compliance.

Other modifications of Bakersfield’s police department would include overseeing the de-escalation process, stun guns misusage, handcuffing children, using police canines during an arrest, and traffic stop procedures.

Having all these practices and changes is great along with being monitored by an outside agency, but the training of the police officer is needed after many of them have been privy to run amuck in the police department.

According to this reform, training will include police stops, analysis of race-stop data, and new crisis-intervention training for dispatchers along with a revised complaint procedure.

As mentioned earlier, other police departments are also under investigation, Los Angeles County‘s Department and the San Franciso Police Department, and a few others outside of California.

In conclusion, this problem of systemic racism and power abuse is not solely in California but across the country as some other attorney general has chosen to mandate new policies and practices while far too many others are sitting on the wayside doing nothing about systemic racism within their department. Changes breed change, and no change means being an accomplice and a perpetrator of misconduct by police officers.

For additional reads:

Police Brutality
Startup
Education
Racism
Life Lessons
Recommended from ReadMedium