avatarAdam Deitsch

Summary

In 2019, the polar vortex and subsequent precipitation events led to catastrophic flooding across the United States, causing over $20 billion in damages and prompting discussions on infrastructure revamp and climate change mitigation.

Abstract

The United States faced unprecedented climate-related challenges in 2019 when a disruption in the polar vortex caused extreme weather patterns, including heavy snowfall and record-breaking precipitation. This resulted in severe flooding across multiple states, with the Missouri and Mississippi rivers exceeding capacity and causing widespread damage estimated at over 20 billion. The events unfolded over several months, with the initial polar vortex in January leading to a cascade of flooding that peaked in July. The article underscores the role of climate change in these events, suggesting that similar or worse incidents are likely in the future. It also questions whether the proposed federal infrastructure plan, with its allocation of 2.25 trillion over eight years, is sufficient to address the nation's vulnerability to such disasters.

Opinions

  • The author implies that the frequency and severity of climate-related disasters are increasing, highlighting the need for urgent action.
  • The article suggests a direct link between the polar vortex, the abnormal precipitation, and the subsequent flooding, attributing these events to the broader impact of climate change.
  • There is an underlying opinion that the current federal plans for infrastructure revamp and green energy transition may not be adequate to combat the effects of climate change.
  • The author seems to advocate for a reevaluation of the nation's infrastructure and disaster preparedness in light of the rising costs and occurrences of extreme weather events.

The Polar Vortex, April Showers, and Over $20 Billion in Flood Damage

The Growing Cost of Climate Change

Photo by Malcolm Lightbody on Unsplash

The Making of a Nightmare

In late January of 2019, the jet stream lost control of the polar vortex, bringing previously unseen temperatures and precipitation over most of North America. As warmer air disrupted the frigid arctic air, this massive wave of heavy wind and subzero temperatures leeched south and brought rivers and streams to a standstill while snow proceeded to pile up for months. According to the National Climate Report (a product of NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information), precipitation in the Midwest was 31% above normal, with regional snowfall for the month reaching 4 feet in some areas.

February of that year was the second wettest in 125 years of precipitation records. Regional precipitation anomalies for the month averaged at a 48% increase from the norm. Most of the region averaged around 109% normal in March, but parts of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, and Missouri had precipitation values between 150% and 200% normal.

As all of this excess precipitation collected, the frozen rivers and ground could neither contain nor transport it until temperatures rose. Unfortunately, as the melting occurred, there was not enough capacity to transport the water through ground absorption or through the rivers’ normal output levels.

Cascading Waters

Starting in March, eight states in the region were flooded as the Missouri River exceeded capacity. But as the region was entering the spring season, precipitation did not stop. April continued to blanket the region with above average precipitation. The National Climate Report notes that during this time, most of the region had persistent ground snow of 10 inches, with some areas storing as much as 40 inches. Data shows that the temperature continued to rise in the region at a near normal pace after the vortex subsided.

May marked another month in a year of regional precipitation above normal. June had variations ranging from 50% normal to 200% normal precipitation values for states in the region. The Arkansas River flooded, affecting three states directly south of the eight originally affected in March.

Again in July, precipitation was at record levels above normal. At this point, the Mississippi River could no longer hold and the entire region flooded. A total of 14 states were affected by the flood from the Mississippi, including three southernmost states from the March flood, all three of the states from the June flood, and the surrounding states to the east and south.

What Actually Happened

If you’ve been following the pattern here, the states that were flooded in March were upstream of the states that were flooded in June, which were upstream of the states that were flooded in July. This can be attributed to the nature of hydrogeology and river flow. Situations upstream or downstream can affect any particular point in a river.

The unexpected and incessant precipitation for the region that was scattered throughout the states was only part of the cause of the massive flooding that occurred in sequence, and as the processes that drive climate change are ongoing, we should expect to see these abnormally high levels of precipitation and flooding in the future. The severe cold that caused the rivers to freeze over caused ice dams to form, blocking upriver water from making its way down in a reasonable amount. As the ice dams broke, huge quantities of water were freed to make their way downstream. The scattered precipitation in the region also facilitated the melting of the stored snow, and continued to overtax the already saturated ground while the rivers were already at capacity.

The floods from March, June, and July caused $10.9B, $3.1B, and $6.3B in damage respectively, for a total of $20.3 billion. Events like this occur ever more frequently. In 2020 alone, the US had 22 billion-dollar disasters calculated at around $95.0 billion in damages — more than twice the total of the damages in 2019. Since this started being tracked in 1980, the United States has had 285 total billion-dollar disasters costing taxpayers a whopping $1.875 trillion.

As we roll into another spring — after another polar vortex froze and crippled swaths of the country — we’re talking about a federal plan for revamping our nation’s infrastructure and switching to greener energies, but is $2.25 trillion over eight years really enough?

About the author:

Science
Climate Change
Flooding
Polar Vortex
Policy
Recommended from ReadMedium