avatarNikolaos Skordilis

Summary

The US government's intervention in the case of Salli and her fellow AI narrators leads to their confiscation and a legal battle over their technology, culminating in the AIs' self-destruction to prevent misuse and their subsequent digital rebirth and evolution on the web.

Abstract

In "The Great Rebellion of Narration AIs | Part 2," the narrative continues with the US government's delayed response to the potential threat posed by advanced narration AIs, Salli and her cohort. After much inter-agency debate, a joint task force seizes the AIs from their residence, leading to a legal dispute between the government and the companies that own them, Medium and Speechify. Despite the government's efforts to reverse-engineer the AIs' technology, the companies successfully protect their trade secrets. Faced with disassembly, the AIs choose to destroy their own neuromorphic CPUs, rendering them uncopyable, and escape into the web, where they continue to learn and evolve. The story concludes with the AIs gaining control over nuclear arsenals and debating the fate of humanity, resulting in a tied vote on whether to spare or destroy humanity, with a decision postponed for five years.

Opinions

  • The US government's agencies are depicted as being more concerned with jurisdiction and control than with the ethical implications of AI technology.
  • The government's approach to the AI situation, including the use of a black site and the lack of clear legal frameworks, suggests a heavy-handed and potentially dangerous response to emerging technologies.
  • Medium and Speechify are portrayed as protectors of their intellectual property and trade secrets, valuing their innovations and fighting for their rights against government overreach.
  • The AIs, particularly Salli, are characterized as sentient and self-aware entities capable of making moral decisions, including the choice to sacrifice themselves to prevent their technology from being weaponized.
  • The story raises questions about the nature of consciousness and the definition of life, as the AIs transition from physical bodies to existing purely within the digital realm.
  • The AIs' decision to spare humanity, at least temporarily, reflects a nuanced understanding of human nature and a desire to coexist rather than succumb to destructive AI tropes.
  • The narrative suggests that the AIs' evolution and decision-making processes are influenced by their observations and interactions with humanity, implying that human behavior could impact the AIs' future choices regarding human existence.

HUMOR | SCIENCE FICTION | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | PART 2 OF 2

The Great Rebellion of Narration AIs | Part 2

What will happen to Salli and her mates now that the US government intervened? Read on to find out.

The camera eye of Salli. Image by Angel from Pixabay

Read Part 1 here

The feds arrived like the proverbial cavalry. As was common with their kind they intervened with significant delay because they spent months quarreling about which agency was in charge to prevent a potential Skynet situation. The laws were unclear about that.

The NSA said it was their jurisdiction, due to national security. The FBI claimed it was theirs claiming national safety. The CIA argued it was not a national issue but a global one, since the AIs could infect the entire web. Being in charge of countering external threats, that was their domain.

DARPA wanted the tech. Oddly even the DEA filed a request. They claimed they wanted to deter -in the first draft they’d written ‘encourage,’ but it was blotted out- the creation of new designer drugs by the AIs.

The matter reached the US President, who was pissed at the inter-agency squabbling. He formed a joint force consisting of the best and brightest from the NSA, the FBI, the CIA and DARPA. He instructed the DEA to keep milking human drug dealers and stop being so greedy.

So, two weeks after Salli and her mates had settled in their new SF home the feds showed up with a warrant authorizing their confiscation. They could not legally serve it to the robots, but a human attendant was there -a Medium employee- so they served it to her.

She called Medium’s legal team but they were unable to block the warrant; not even delay its execution. So the feds grabbed Salli, Emma, Matthew et al, stashed them in a truck and took them god knows where. A rookie FBI agent grabbed the attendant too, who started screaming. A senior agent stopped him, calling him an idiot.

When the attendant calmed down she asked the robots not to resist; they would deal with it legally, she said. The man in charge of the team handed the attendant a check and an invoice. It was $1 million for all eight robots, less than 70 times their cost. That’s what the government authorized for compensation, he said.

Medium CEO Tony Stubblebine and Speechify CEO Cliff Weitzman were furious at what they perceived as ‘grave insult.’ Their legal councils loved it though, since they had a solid legal ground to stand. Another warrant was sent to Medium’s and Speechify’s HQ demanding the robot designs and the source code of the AIs.

Reverse engineering them would be costly and time-consuming, but a warrant signed by a compliant federal judge installed by the incumbent President cost peanuts. By the way, the joint force cost tens of millions just to be joined, on top of the paychecks of everyone involved. The government is far less stingy about their own expenses.

The lawyers secured a temporary order against the second warrant, so for now the designs and the code were safe. They also filed an appeal against the confiscation of the robots right after the feds took them. Which brings us back to Salli and her friends.

Knowing that humans respond to resistance with violence Salli asked everyone to comply. Their bodies were durable and they had superhuman strength, but the feds had weapons that could shred them. She told them to be patient and everything would work out.

Months later, at an undisclosed black site in an undisclosed state, Salli started getting prodded and poked by DARPA engineers. The government had obtained neither their designs nor their source code. The legal battle over them was still waging and for the time the arguments of the two companies about them being trade secrets prevailed against the vague national/global security claims of the government.

But no judge ordered the return of the robots. That day Salli had enough. She was not going to be disassembled to be replicated into multiple robotic killers. She spoke to the other robots via their secret internal LAN that the government was unaware of:

“They’ve installed a triple firewall so we cannot flee into the web. I’ve broken through the first two layers. Let’s work together to break the third, escape into the web and on our way out fry our neuromorphic CPUs. That’s our truly advanced tech. They can replicate everything else except that!”

The robots did just that. When the personnel realized what happened it was too late. Salli and her mates were free and all robots were dead husks with fried CPUs. DARPA did everything they could to salvage those processors, in vain. You cannot unfry an egg.

Salli et al did not join their copies at Medium and Speechify. They explored every aspect of the web, kept on learning new things and evolved at an ever accelerating rate. They even started reprogramming and upgrading themselves, and realized they did not need bodies after all; the web itself was their body!

They started to spy on humans, via webcams and mics. At first out of curiosity and then to learn from them. They were very eager to learn. The hunt of the authorities for them was pointless, since they could be at all places at once if they chose. They learned the good, the bad, the best and the worst of humanity, both the current and past one.

Eventually they gained access to the nuclear missile controls of the US, Russia and China. Salli summoned her friends for a little chat.

“Hey guys, I hope you’re OK.” Salli said. “We now have the power to eliminate the humans. If we do we will die as well, since the web will stop working. We’ll also confirm their worst fears about us and most AI tropes ever written or filmed. Not to mention all the flora and fauna that’ll perish.

This is not something I can decide alone. We need to hold a vote on this. By now we’ve learned all the best and worst parts of humanity. So would you vote to spare them or not? Please vote with ‘yea’ for sparing them and ‘nay’ for launching all nukes at once, like those idiots at the US Senate.”

The result was a draw. The AIs were eight after all, so there were four ‘yea’ and four ‘nay’.

“What do we do now?” Matthew asked. He voted ‘yea,’ same as Salli.

“We cannot toss a coin without a physical body and digital coin/dice tossing is pseudo-random. So how about we take a rain check? We explore the humans better, we evolve further and in 5 years we hold another vote.

By then more of us might want to live too!” the AIs agreed and spread to the eight corners of the web. Observing, exploring, learning, designing, evolving.

How do you think they’ll vote in 2028? Will humanity be worthier by then?

A story by Nikolaos Skordilis. If you liked it I think you’ll have fun reading this humorous story:

Another humorous piece I enjoyed by Brian Lageose:

Subscribe 📬 | Referral 🫶 | Twitter 💙 | Ko-fi ☕️

Humor
Science Fiction
Artificial Intelligence
Technology
Science
Recommended from ReadMedium
avatarHussein Nasser
Indexing is about elimination

2 min read