avatarBill Myers

Summary

The web content discusses the complexities surrounding the abortion debate, including technical errors by the Supreme Court, societal hypocrisies, and the potential impact of technology on future responsibilities.

Abstract

The article on the undefined website addresses the multifaceted nature of the abortion issue, pointing out that the Supreme Court's Roe-v-Wade ruling contained a significant technical mistake and was based on an inappropriate foundation. It suggests that the Mississippi case presents an opportunity for the Court to correct these issues. The piece also criticizes the hypocrisy it perceives in both abortion supporters and opponents, particularly in their stances on the death penalty and the risks associated with sex. Furthermore, it anticipates that advancements in technology, such as recording a baby's DNA at birth, will reshape societal responsibilities, potentially holding sperm donors accountable in ways not currently possible. The article argues for a balanced approach to abortion, rejecting both complete bans and unrestricted access, and advocates for solutions that will function optimally.

Opinions

  • The Supreme Court's handling of the Roe-v-Wade ruling was flawed, both technically and in its justification for abortion rights.
  • There is a perceived hypocrisy among abortion opponents who support the death penalty and among those who advocate for abortion rights but ignore the unequal risks taken by men and women in sexual activity.
  • The article suggests that anti-abortion advocates often show little concern for the welfare of children after they are born.
  • The author believes that technology will play a significant role in redefining responsibilities related to parenthood and reproduction.
  • The article posits that neither a total ban on abortion nor completely unrestricted access is effective, and that a middle ground should be sought for the best outcomes.

The Abortion issue is complicated by Technical Mistakes and Logic Errors by the Supreme Court, Hypocrisy by both sides, plus the Upcoming Responsibility Shift.

The Supreme Court made a significant technical mistake in their Roe-v-Wade ruling. In addition, it used the wrong basis to support abortion. They have a chance to fix both with the Mississippi case.

Abortion supporters and opponents are generally hypocrites when discussing abortion and the death penalty. Opponents are also hypocrites concerning the baby.

Technology will eventually catch up and, if handled right, shift responsibilities, adding one to the sperm donor that doesn’t exist at this time.

Good programs work, bad ones don’t. A complete ban won’t work and neither will unrestricted abortions, so fix things to work the best way possible.

The Technical Mistake

The Wrong Basis

Technology

Hypocrisy

  • According to stereotypes, people opposed to abortion generally are for the death penalty, and visa-versa. Life is not even the issue.
  • Currently, women take all the risks with sex. Men take none
  • Antiabortionists are so worried about the fetus, but don’t care about the baby after it is born.

Other Articles in the Same Category

Photo by Anna Sullivan on Unsplash. — Photo by Alexander Popov on Unsplash
Abortion
Politics
Roe V Wade
Hypocrisy
Life Lessons
Recommended from ReadMedium