Evangelicals, including James Dobson, have propagated the unsupported claim that Ted Bundy's serial killings were a result of his pornography consumption, a narrative that Bundy himself fueled in a calculated interview before his execution to potentially delay it, which has been debunked by criminologists and those who knew him.
Abstract
The article challenges the evangelical narrative that attributes Ted Bundy's notorious serial killings to his consumption of pornography. It highlights an interview conducted by James Dobson, an evangelical figure known for his stance against pornography, the day before Bundy's execution. Bundy's statements in the interview are presented as a last-minute attempt to shift blame and possibly influence the governor's decision on his execution. The article underscores that Bundy's claims were self-serving and not an accurate reflection of his motivations for the murders. Criminologists, psychologists, and Bundy's own biographers, such as Ann Rule, have dismissed the idea that pornography was the catalyst for his violent actions. Instead, they suggest that Bundy's drive was rooted in a quest for power and control, and his interview was a final act of manipulation. Despite the lack of evidence supporting a causal link between pornography and violent sex crimes, Dobson profited from the interview, using it to bolster his anti-pornography campaign.
Opinions
The evangelical community, particularly James Dobson, is criticized for selectively using Bundy's interview to support their anti-pornography agenda, despite the lack of evidence connecting pornography to violent crimes.
Ted Bundy's interview with Dobson is seen as a strategic move to delay his execution and absolve himself of responsibility, rather than a genuine confession or insight into his crimes.
Criminologists like John E. Douglas and Bundy's biographers, including Ann Rule, reject the notion that pornography led to Bundy's murders, emphasizing his desire for power and manipulation as core motivations.
The article suggests that Dobson misrepresented the views of FBI profiler John E. Douglas to strengthen the narrative linking pornography to serial killing.
The profit made by Dobson's organization from selling the interview is viewed as exploitative and indicative of a broader agenda to influence public opinion against pornography.
The article implies that Bundy's true character and motivations are better understood through his actions and the accounts of those who knew him, rather than his final interview.
Ted Bundy didn’t kill people because of porn
Evangelicals tell a lie about a serial killer
Every day, Evangelicals like to say that watching porn leads to all kinds of horrors—like serial killing. The proof? An interview with Ted Bundy himself.
A clip from a 1989 interview with Bundy, done the day before he was executed, is a staple of social media. What the religion doesn’t tell you is everything.
When Evangelicals present the moment, Bundy seems to be giving a final confession to a cleric.
To help the illusion along, the interviewer, James Dobson, is oftencalled the Reverend Dr. James Dobson.
Never a cleric, Dobson was once a child psychologist, and had become an Evangelical spokesman on “family” issues—then from 1985 on, he was a Republican activist. That was his basic status in 1989.
A biography of Dobson, Family Man: The Biography of Dr. James Dobson by Dale Buss, notes that Dobson was cozy with the Reagan administration, and trying to move public opinion to restrict porn.
He’d noticed that FBI literature had linked porn and serial killers.
An FBI “profiler” named John E. Douglas had mused about a connection. When Dobson summarized Douglas’ views, he had the ‘expert’ saying that male porn viewers:
“…got hooked on hard-core porn through the doorway of soft-core porn and walked through that progressive experience leading to harder and harder, more violent material and eventually coming to a place where they crossed the line from fantasy to reality.”
Alerted to Dobson’s use of his ideas. Douglas clarified that he did not view ordinary porn viewing as leading to violent crime, but only that those “prone to that sort of thinking” might “get some of their ideas from it.”
Ted Bundy noticed James Dobson.
In August 1987, the serial killer was thinking about a privilege he was allowed by Florida law for inmates on Death Row. He could do an interview with the media, which could only be released after his death. He offered to talk with Dobson about pornography.
As Dale Buss reports, Dobson felt “honored.” And so, on January 24th, 1989, the day before Bundy was scheduled to be executed in the Florida State Prison, the cameras were rolling.
Bundy went on about growing up a “normal person,” but as a boy he’d found some porn in a dumpster. His life went to hell from there.
Viewers might not notice some legal details.
In her 1994 memoir, Defending the Devil, Bundy’s lawyer, Polly Nelson, discusses the interview. There was still hope in their minds that Florida’s governor would stay the execution. She prepped Bundy beforehand, telling him not to discuss any Florida crimes.
Dobson asked Bundy about Kimberly Leach, the 12-year-old girl who had been Bundy’s last victim. Bundy stopped. “I can’t really talk about that right now,” he said. “That’s…”
Dobson thought that Bundy was overcome with feeling—and supplied it himself. “That’s too painful,” Dobson said.
As Polly Nelson notes, this was a Florida crime, and Bundy wasn’t discussing it so as not to interrupt any process of staying his execution.
The interview had been a performance for one man.
The Republican governor of Florida, Bob Martinez, was a famous Catholic campaigner against ‘obscenity’. (In 1990, the group 2 Live Crew recorded a track about him, “Fuck Martinez.”)
That was the view of his next interviewer, Al Carlisle, the psychologist who knew Bundy well. Carlisle challenged him, saying the Dobson interview had just been an “attempt to get a stay of execution.”
Bundy didn’t dispute that, but launched into some religious talk of how killing people made him feel godlike. He adds:
“I have found a sense of peace. I still don’t know if I believe in a literal God but, if there is one, I hope that he will have mercy on me.”
As his execution upon him, Bundy was offered a clerical visit.
Rev. Fred Lawrence was interviewed for David Von Drehle’s Among the Lowest of the Dead. He and Bundy, he recalled, had talked quite a while.
“I don’t think he knew how many he killed or why he killed them,” Lawrence says. “That was my impression, my strong impression.”
Criminologists were asked about it. One named William Wilbanks was quoted in news reports explaining the interview could not be taken at face value. He says:
“By placing the blame on porn, Bundy absolved himself of personal responsibility and portrayed himself as a victim of porn. His suggestion that he was not trying to avoid responsibility was either a self-deception or a final ‘con’ on the public he so despises.”
In period news reports, Bundy biographer Stephen Michaud dismissed it completely. “Look,” he said:
“…the last time Bundy was caught, you know what he had in his car? A stack of well-thumbed pamphlets for cheerleader training schools. He was into cheerleader pamphlets, and he wasn’t using them for scratch paper. He also got off on his college physiology text, which had diagrams of female genitalia.”
But Evangelicals were convinced.
The interview was a phenomenon, as Dobson sold VHS copies for $25 a copy. Within a year his organization had made a million dollars off the product, and his anti-pornography crusade was dramatically strengthened.
“This is just one more manifestation of guys like Bundy trying to shove blame for their actions onto something or someone else.”
Bundy biographers continued to totally repudiate the interview as a real statement of Bundy’s motivations. Ann Rule, who had known Bundy, has a treatment of the matter in her classic true-crime book The Stranger Beside Me. She notes that Bundy had talked with Dobson about being warped by not just porn, but by detective magazines. She quoted a letter Bundy wrote her in 1977 saying he had never looked at such a magazine.
“I don’t think pornography caused Ted Bundy to kill thirty-six or one hundred or three hundred women. I think he became addicted to the power his crimes gave him. And I think he wanted to leave us talking about him, debating the wisdom of his words. In that, Ted succeeded magnificently.”