avatarTeri Radichel

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

11620

Abstract

omen’s movements advocating for gender equality in an intersectional way, where feminism should meet the experiences of this demographic of women, is at her intersection of <b><i>culture</i></b>, race, and gender oppression that is at a cross-road with the traditional, white, female-focused movement in the first (1840–1920), second (1962–1980s), and possibly arguably even third (1990s) <a href="https://www.history.com/news/feminism-four-waves">waves of feminism</a> that mainly all focused on the experiences of oppression from a predominantly western white female perspective alone.</p><h1 id="034e">Female Gender Oppression: Population Control via The Medical Profession</h1><p id="531d">Kim Jiyoung’s friend falls pregnant, and what a drama it caused; this was around the time when the government implemented “birth control” policies they called “family planning.” Abortion was legal for medical related reasons. What if I told you that being born female was also considered a “medical problem” and a reason for her friend to consider abortion? And clearly some medical professionals felt the same way. The author cites this as a common dilemma for women throughout the 1980s-1990s. While the author does not go deep into this subject as part of the plot, I did do some investigation myself into this. According to the <i>Feminist Majority’s</i> short report they released in <a href="https://feminist.org/news/korean-women-pressured-to-abort-girl-babies-to-try-for-sons/">January 1997</a> they confirmed that:</p><blockquote id="cdaa"><p>“Although fetal sex identification and abortion are against the law in South Korea, women continue to feel pressure to abort girl fetuses in order to try for sons.”</p></blockquote><p id="5cf4">Also</p><blockquote id="fe88"><p>“Compared to a natural ratio of 105 boys born for every 100 girls (which later evens out to 1:1 since boys die earlier), some regions in South Korea have rates of 125 boys born to every 100 girls resulting in 30,000 fewer girls born each year than would be the case without sex-influenced abortions.”</p></blockquote><p id="9143">And</p><blockquote id="41f7"><p>“A Chinese government report in 1992 found the ratio in China at 118.5 boys to 100 girls, statistics which embarrassed the government enough that it never formally released the results.”</p></blockquote><p id="9f55">When looking the pressure Korean women face to have sons, taking a simple glance at the birth rate ratio would lead a critical mind to see the ratio supports the argument that the medical profession had what I would call “a silent compliance” to help embed and maintain female oppression, by aborting female babies. Sure, no doctor with his or her head on straight will announce to the world, “come to me for female terminations, I’ll gladly help you.” But that doesn’t mean it wasn’t going on. The stats on the birth rate ratio show that at this point in time, in the nineties when the rates were released, female terminations must have been carried out at a high rate.</p><p id="1f4d">What is key to note about the male to female birth rate ratio is: any parent will probably remember the scan they were given when their fetus was eighteen to twenty weeks old. Around this time, when you’re offered a nice photo of the baby, you can also <a href="https://www.healthline.com/health/pregnancy/when-can-you-find-out-sex-of-baby#medical-tests">learn the sex of the baby</a>. For the Korean women it’s at this point that terminations logically must have been happening for females babies. This is as late as five months into pregnancy; abortions done then come with a higher risk to the mother as stated in the research done by <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614144/"><i>Frontiers in Women’s Global Health’s</i></a><i> </i>2022 study across southern Ethiopia. Their report asserts that:</p><blockquote id="eb57"><p>“Second-trimester abortion accounts for 10–15% of all induced abortions, with varying rates across countries, and is responsible for two-thirds of major abortion complications. It is also associated with higher medical costs, morbidity, and mortality rates than first-trimester abortion.”</p></blockquote><p id="e44f">With only 10–15 % as a norm for abortions at this stage, we can assume it’s not the norm globally. The <a href="http://aidtowomencenter.org/abortion-secondtrimester"><i>Aid to Women Centre</i></a> also cites a lot of risks and complications post abortion for women who have second trimester abortions. The Korean women have been subjected to a health risk, for the sake of maintaining their cultural patriarchy, which is not something we see a lot of for the western woman, in western culture.</p><p id="d54f">If we further compare the western gender oppression to the Koren women’s via the outcomes for female babies, and the medical profession’s willingness to partake in oppression, and lastly the health risk of a woman choosing late termination (even if the practice was more common in the eighties-nineties), you see that this type of oppression is not a cultural norm in the west. It could be argued that pressure should be placed on the Korean medical profession for better regulation of abortion practices.</p><p id="67d5">For Korean women their intersection of cultural oppression includes a key aspect western woman do not have. Which is: from the womb, females leave a bad taste in society’s mouth. Whether you have a girl or a boy, generally speaking, for the western woman it is a cause for celebration, not abortion.</p><figure id="d363"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*i1XzuPmk2jAonENWjAYxTA.jpeg"><figcaption>Photo by <a href="https://unsplash.com/@thatsherbusiness?utm_content=creditCopyText&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=unsplash">That’s Her Business</a> on <a href="https://unsplash.com/photos/white-ceramic-mug-on-white-ceramic-plate-8KHPeh9mNvs?utm_content=creditCopyText&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=unsplash">Unsplash</a></figcaption></figure><h1 id="3e35">The Role of Korean Women: Their ‘Double Jeopardy’ and Work</h1><p id="a483">Being a woman with another characteristic that can be used for oppression (such as race or class), has been defined as ‘a double jeopardy’ by the black feminist Frances. M. Beal, in her work <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Jeopardy:_To_Be_Black_and_Female"><i>Double Jeopardy: To Be Black and Female (1969)</i></a><i>. </i>In relation to the Korean woman, her double jeopardy is being female and living in a <b>culture which defines her role in a specific way</b>. Korean females are often not shunned for working or discouraged from working. In the west, the “right to work” caused a ruckus from predominantly white women in the second wave (1963–1980s) of feminism, against white men’s oppression. But the Korean woman is often expected to work, not for herself but to support the males in her family so that <b>they can progress</b> in life. Woman will work in substandard conditions with risks to their health, for terrible wages, to gain a few pennies to rub together in the contribution pot of male success. In <i>Kim Jiyong, Born in 1982, </i>the author writes:</p><blockquote id="b3ac"><p>“This was at a time when people believed it was up to the <b>sons</b> to bring honour and success to the family. The family’s wealth and happiness <b>hinged upon male</b> success. The <b>daughters</b> gladly supported the male siblings.”</p></blockquote><p id="e10a">This narrative comes in a scene where we see a Korean lady struggling with work to provide for a man and fulfill her cultural duty. Yet she could not dream for herself, and she could not be a success, and she could not work in the profession of her own desire.</p><p id="f2e2">Where culture meets feminism from this angle of work and roles in society, is a need to recognise the “double jeopardy” for Korean women — that is focused on <b>cultural roles and norms</b> for her as a woman in the world of work. Outside of being white and female, the cultural roles for women often do look very different for the black, brown, and minority woman; I have said this before and will keep saying it.</p><p id="bac4">The Korean woman is in a similar position of not being able to pursue her dream of her ideal career, just like white feminists fought for the right to work against white men. However, what is unique to women in different communities is that it is <b>a necessity for them to work and they are expected to</b>, <b>but not for them</b>, for the <b>patriarchy</b>, in the context of Korean women. For black women this looks different which I do plan to write about in a future story. Sticking to the Korean women’s plight and experience, now, if this is not oppression worth noting, or checking the patriarchy’s behaviour to show them how it damages the Korean women, then I don’t know what is.</p><p id="f1a9" type="7">Where culture meets feminism from this angle of work and roles in society, is a need to recognise the “double jeopardy” for Korean women</p><h1 id="7d11">Education of Korean Girls and Women</h1><p id="7ff4">In addition to being expected to work minor jobs to support the patriarchy, the Korean woman’s education is sacrificed. Boys are prepared for school with the right equipment, books, lunches etc., as mentioned earlier. Later on, when it comes to further education, boys are encouraged to attend higher education to access the degrees that will land them high paying jobs. While girls are not put in this position, but it’s fine for them to work on lower paying jobs, in risky environments, to support this cultural norm and the patriarchy. If you’re a woman in the west, tell me: when was the last time this was expected of you, as a woman?</p><h1 id="3ac5">How Cultural Oppression Embraces Sexual and Physical Harassment</h1><p id="7490">One of the most heartbreaking things about the cultural oppression Korean women face, for me as a reader of the author’s work, was how vivid it was that sexual and physical harassment is something Korean girls should just get used to. It appeared to be a cultural norm, something that starts from an early age and doubles down on the learning Korean girls gain around their status being lower than boys.</p><p id="fe7a">It appears that if a girl or woman is a victim, she is questioned over what she possibly could have done to bring the assault on herself. We do see this today in the western culture at times; it would be a lie to say we don’t.</p><p id="a618">The difference is when comparing the western woman’s potential experience of the doubt around her experiences, and the Korean woman’s, culturally it seems more acceptable to disbelieve a Korean woman. Also, it’s more culturally acceptable to physically/sexually harass women. For women, it’s almost like harassment is an expected life experience that is a woman’s responsibility to avoid.</p><p id="669c">One of the most dramatic examples of this embedded culture was while Kim Jiyoung was at school. She was bullied by a boy, and the teacher blamed her. The truth only came out when another young girl was brave enough to raise her hand and say what she saw. Later on, we follow young Kim Jiyong’s story as she makes her way home from school. A boy follows her, and even attempts to intimidate her with sexual advances on the bus. Her father’s response is to ask her, “what did you do?” for her to bring on his attack.</p><p id="4479"><a href="http://dis.hanyang.ac.kr/lyceum-vol-1/sexual-harassment-in-south-korea/"><i>The Hangyang Dis Division of International Studies</i></a> backs up the ex

Options

periences of Kim Jiyoung; they reported in 2018:</p><ul><li>a sexual assault is reported across south Korea at a rate of 3 cases an hour.</li><li>98% of assaulters being men, and 86% of victims being women.</li><li>One of the most common places of assault happening in the workplace.</li></ul><p id="cca9"><a href="http://dis.hanyang.ac.kr/lyceum-vol-1/sexual-harassment-in-south-korea/">The <i>Hangyang Dis Division of International Studies </i></a>also says in their report:</p><blockquote id="cdd6"><p>“Before you ask yourself why these women don’t speak-out, you must first understand the culture background of their society.”</p></blockquote><p id="1008">Supporting the last point above, we see workplace sexual harassment when Kim Jiyoung enters the world of work, in the field of marketing. A male security guard takes it upon himself to install secret cameras in one female toilet, then uploads the images to a pornographic site. He shares his assault with other men in the workplace, the cat is only let out of the bag when the word reached Kim Jiyoung’s female friend via her boyfriend — who warned her to use a different bathroom. The women engage in sexual assault litigation against the company; then the male CEO of the company responds to the women who were victims of the pornographic website experience:</p><blockquote id="62fc"><p>“It’ll ruin this company’s reputation if word gets around in the field, The accused male employees have families and parents to protect, too. Do you really want to destroy people’s lives like this?”</p></blockquote><p id="3a9e">What we see here is sexual harassment at its finest, with a spoonful of misogyny mixed in. It could be argued that any boss would respond like this, especially a male boss, to protect their company. Yet the men themselves who were part of the sexual assault admitted what they did but see no wrongdoing — that’s the cultural dynamic around overlooking women and sexual assault the <i>Hangyang Dis Division of International Studies</i> is probably referring to in their citation about understanding culture, above.</p><p id="7201">When compared to western culture, this is not something that would be taken as lightly. It could even be argued that a CEO (for the good of their company) is more likely to disassociate with the offenders of sexual assault to protect their brand. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Combs">Sean ‘Puffy’ Combs,</a> the American rapper who currently at the time of writing has <a href="https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2023-12-06/sean-diddy-combs-sexual-assault-harve-pierre-fourth-woman">four sexual assault</a> cases against him, has been dropped from all of his lucrative money making deals by big companies. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Brand">Russell Brand,</a> who is also caught up in sexual assault cases, lost his <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/19/youtube-suspends-russell-brand-revenues-channel">YouTube monetised channels</a>, and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Majors">Jonathan Majors</a> was <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jonathan-majors-assault-projects-dropped-b2324039.html">dropped from his acting roles</a> due to his accusations of sexual assault; this has all happened in 2023 at the time of writing this. In the west what we see here is a different response to women’s sexual assault. We have a “cancel culture” for men. Korean has a “what did we really do wrong? You can’t cancel us” culture. For the fourth wave feminist, this is something to challenge when culture meets feminism. The patriarchy needs checking around their handling — literally of women and their bodies, which they feel are free to access for all.</p><figure id="550f"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*fuRradtidxYvIirUNUppbg.jpeg"><figcaption>Photo by <a href="https://unsplash.com/@sandym10?utm_content=creditCopyText&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=unsplash">Sandy Millar</a> on <a href="https://unsplash.com/photos/gold-wedding-band-on-white-textile-8vaQKYnawHw?utm_content=creditCopyText&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=unsplash">Unsplash</a></figcaption></figure><h1 id="afc3">About Married Life and Korean Women’s Oppression</h1><p id="736c">For the Korean woman, she is often forced to give up work (if she has been lucky enough to find it), once she gets married. The pressure to get married is high, and her choice between work, marriage, and children is due to cultural expectations; this is not a woman who can have it all in any way shape or form. Once a woman is married it is an expectation, demand, and almost her duty to now start popping out babies — that are male, mind you. So that he can “bring the success, prosperity, and respect to the family,” as mentioned earlier.</p><p id="f56f">It was around 2014 when Kim Jiyoung finally secured work, battling through the sexism she faced as a Korean woman, which I deep dive into in my essay, <a href="https://readmedium.com/is-feminism-to-blame-for-korean-women-taking-down-the-patriarchy-870090bcc034?sk=ab5fcd0da5d394069b13b6107ad7dbe3"><i>Is Feminism to Blame For Korean Women Taking Down The Patriarchy</i></a><i>. </i>Then Kim Jiyoung left work, just as one in five Korean women quit their job citing: marriage, pregnancy, childbirth and care, or the education of their younger children, according to <a href="https://eng.kwdi.re.kr/inc/download.do?ut=A&amp;upIdx=101628&amp;no=1"><i>Women’s Lives Through Statistics in 2015, Statistics Korea</i></a><i>. </i>Around the time Kim Jiyong was faced with life changes the author asserted that:</p><blockquote id="fe06"><p>“The workforce participation rate of Korean women decreases significantly before and after childbirth. Its percentage starts at 63.8% for women aged twenty and twenty-nine, drops to 58% for women aged thirty to thirty-nine.”</p></blockquote><p id="da10">What this shows is that when culture meets feminism in this area for women, there is greater pressure, expectation, and demand for them to leave work to have male children, and if they do return to work after birth — to work to support their son’s progression. The latter, the author demonstrates, often means taking a lower paying job and giving up a career. Kim Jiyoung went from being a marketing executive in a male, sexist, environment — but she made it! — to considering part-time work in an ice cream parlour. This expectation is not a cultural norm for many of us western women, but one we need to be sensitive to, if we are to be inclusive female advocates.</p><p id="c887">Husbands also add to this pressure to leave work but fail to see what their wives are giving up. This plays out for readers clearly when married Kim Jiyoung is pressured by in-laws to have a child, then discusses it with her husband. They have barely been married five minutes at this point:</p><blockquote id="0c7b"><p>“And what will you be giving up <i>Oppa</i>?</p></blockquote><blockquote id="844d"><p>“What?”</p></blockquote><blockquote id="5852"><p>“You said don’t just think about what I’ll be giving up. I’m putting my youth, health, job, colleagues, social networks, career plans, and future on the line. No wonder all I can think about are the things I’m giving up. But what about you? What do you lose by gaining a child.”</p></blockquote><p id="e500">Her husband, true to his culture, did not see Kim Jiyoung’s personal goals, dreams, and rights to work go down the pan, in favour of producing child after child until she has a boy. Only to then take work well below her skills to provide for the male child.</p><p id="3643">For intersectionality to really make an impact in this fourth wave of feminism, as I said in the opening, eyes must be opened, ears must be fixed, and the advocate for women’s rights must step outside not only their <a href="https://readmedium.com/the-intersection-when-race-meets-feminism-the-unfinished-conversation-d39e2dda8062?sk=ecfa9780caf2ab4cc78d4d86dc2d29b3">race</a>, class, sexuality, able body, but also their<b> culture</b> to understand how oppression looks different for different demographics of women. This is how the patriarchy’s behaviour oppresses some women; the men do nothing to change a son’s position being more valuable than daughter’s from the moment they are conceived. They take this status norm in their culture as chance to exploit women sexually, physically, and even financially with Korea having the largest gender pay gap in the Asian countries. The patriarchy’s behaviour is culturally harming women; this is not my opinion, this is based on the data, statistics, and evidence presented. My message to the patriarchy is: don’t argue with me, argue with the evidence, and do something about it.</p><p id="0517"><b>What are your thoughts and feelings now that you’ve seen cultural oppression by reading these words?</b></p><p id="319a"><i>Thanks for your readership, I hope my writing gave you something to think about. If I’ve caught you in a good mood or you’re feeling kind, you can buy me a coffee here: <a href="https://www.buymeacoffee.com/meandmymuse">https://www.buymeacoffee.com/MeAndMyMuse</a>. Why not follow me for more of my thought-provoking muse?</i></p><p id="b84b"><b>Further reading:</b></p><div id="b269" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/is-feminism-to-blame-for-korean-women-taking-down-the-patriarchy-870090bcc034"> <div> <div> <h2>Is “Feminism to Blame” For Korean Women Taking Down The Patriarchy?</h2> <div><h3>And they are using their wombs!</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*dlbaZB-GAzJKEHITvpsrLA.jpeg)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="e914" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/the-intersection-when-race-meets-feminism-the-unfinished-conversation-d39e2dda8062"> <div> <div> <h2>The Intersection When Race Meets Feminism: The Unfinished Conversation</h2> <div><h3>Who is wiling to have it?</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*9ssL5l5Hjai5yhg3riC6Jg.png)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="9ef5" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/intersection-where-class-meets-feminism-are-the-women-of-latin-america-class-less-dc3ff334e521"> <div> <div> <h2>Where Class Meets Feminism: Are the Women of Latin America Class-less?</h2> <div><h3>And whose responsibility is it to improve their lot?</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*b5hexyyoSq8tEGd10Fdf2w.jpeg)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><p id="08a1"><i>For more of the good stuff, follow <a href="https://medium.com/fourth-wave">Fourth Wave</a>. Have you got a story, essay, or poem that focuses on women or other disempowered groups? <a href="https://readmedium.com/submit-to-the-wave-7c92f095e86f">Submit to the Wave!</a></i></p></article></body>

Revisiting The Generic Lambda Function Objective

ACM.346 Create a Lambda function to push changes in CodeCommit to an S3 bucket — The Function

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

⚙️ Check out my series on Automating Cybersecurity Metrics | Code.

🔒 Related Stories: AWS Security | Lambda Security | Application Security

💻 Free Content on Jobs in Cybersecurity | ✉️ Sign up for the Email List

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In the last post I was exploring AWS CodeCommit triggers. Before I go through the exercise of trying to use a new thing I want to see if it’s even going to work. I think it will but the documentation is a bit confusing.

In this post I want to deploy a Lambda function that copies code from AWS CodeCommit to S3 when a new code gets pushed to a repository.

Recall that I already have deployed a repository and showed you how to create Lambda functions that use containers in this series. I also created a bash custom runtime for Lambda and I’m going to use that for this function.

First, I create a new folder for my new lambda function. I name it:

CodeCommitToS3

I copy the deploy file from the dockertest lambda container experiment and rename the function in it.

Recall that I changed deploy_lambda_policy to deploy_app_policy while testing AWS Batch since both could deploy a generic role that has access to a secret with the name name as the Batch Job or Lambda function. I need to modify the name in the script above and in the dockertest Lambda function deployment script while I’m at it. I’m going to set secret to false because this function does not need a secret in AWS Secrets Manager.

But recall that I was not able to assume a role in the Lambda function, though I don’t see any documentation that is disallowed:

I’m still wondering if I did something wrong or if that is a temporary glitch. But for now I’m going to presume it’s not allowed. The credentials from the Lambda function work locally but not in Lambda.

Since I cannot assume a role from the Lambda role, I cannot create a generic policy to deploy with every Lambda function. I need to create a specific policy for my Lambda function with everything it needs to do in that policy. That means if I need something unique, I can’t use the generic role, without giving permission to all other Lambda functions to do the thing I want this Lambda function to do.

I need the Lambda function I’m creating in this post to be able to copy files from a repository and push them to an S3 bucket. I also want to make sure the wrong repository is not pushed to the wrong S3 bucket. That requires some thought and policy limitations or account segregation. I’m not going to get into here too deeply, but we don’t want a policy that has access to every S3 bucket in the organization that leads to something like the Capital One breach.

My current approach will be that this function will have access to specific static website repositories. It will be able to push to S3 buckets in an AWS account that is specifically used for hosting static websites. No sensitive data will exist in the S3 buckets in that account.

The function will be generic such that it can only pull from and push to a source and destination with matching (or aligned depending on naming restrictions) names. In other words, dev.rainierrhododendrons.com code must be pushed to a dev.rainierrhododendrons.com bucket.

The account will also be locked down when not being updated. I demonstrated such security controls with Service Control Policies here:

For now, the policy is going to allow access to a specific repository and an S3 bucket in another account.

I’ll create that in a future post and update the Lambda function with that policy because I ran into a bunch of other issues trying to get this function deployed.

While deploying this function I got blocked by an SCP policy that said my SandboxAdmin was blocked by a specific deny. Well, that is not exactly accurate. It could be that the policy was blocking the SandboxAdmin on MFA.

Ok so I removed the MFA restriction as a test. But the SandboxAdmin was still blocked. The only thing that was remaining in the policy was the network restriction. Lambda traffic should only be coming from a specific IP (for the console) and from specific VPC Endpoints.

This worked before and does not make any sense that it is not working now. I see that AWS was working on an AWS operational issue this a.m. and I wonder if it could somehow be related. In any case, I temporarily removed this restriction to deploy the Lambda function and restored it afterwards.

I had a problem like this the other day with the SCP in the AWS documentation that only allows specific regions. It started blocking global services.

I had to remove that regions SCP previously. Now I have reapplied it and hopefully it’s working again. I am able to access IAM, etc.

I later figured out why the SCP is failing and I don’t agree with how this is implemented. I hope AWS will fix it.

Well that took some time to sort out which slowed down this blog post.

Then something else odd happened. My trust policy, which worked fine before, didn’t work anymore. I got an error saying the role does not allow Lambda to assume it.

Here’s what my trust policy looked like:

Well, I modified the trust policy slightly to look like this:

Then it worked. I have no idea why that made a difference if it worked before.

Finally…I could deploy the Lambda function with an error that makes sense. It said that I was trying to deploy the Lambda with a container that has been deleted.

So here’s the next predicament. I was using the function name for the container name.

The problem is that I named my function with upper and lowercase letters. My container name can only have lowercase letters so I can’t make the names match if I use that.

Initially I tried to create a container name with underscores (_) between the words to make it easier to read. But you cannot have underscores in Lambda names.

I want to make sure the container and Lambda function are aligned and the only way to do that is with a completely lowercase name which is kind of ugly. But I guess that is our only option.

So I’m going to change the Lambda function name to:

codecommittos3

I also have to push a container to ECR with that same name even if it is just a placeholder. I’ll need to reconsider my order of deployment tasks for Lambda functions. Once I have a base container I can push a default to ECR during the deployment process that just prints “hello world” or something.

With that code change and a temporary container with the correct name pushed to ECR as I explained how to do in prior posts, I was able to deploy the Lambda function. Not sure why all those things that worked before started failing.

I’ll deploy the policy next and a container that clones and copies the files to S3.

Follow for updates.

Teri Radichel | © 2nd Sight Lab 2023

About Teri Radichel:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
⭐️ Author: Cybersecurity Books
⭐️ Presentations: Presentations by Teri Radichel
⭐️ Recognition: SANS Award, AWS Security Hero, IANS Faculty
⭐️ Certifications: SANS ~ GSE 240
⭐️ Education: BA Business, Master of Software Engineering, Master of Infosec
⭐️ Company: Penetration Tests, Assessments, Phone Consulting ~ 2nd Sight Lab
Need Help With Cybersecurity, Cloud, or Application Security?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
🔒 Request a penetration test or security assessment
🔒 Schedule a consulting call
🔒 Cybersecurity Speaker for Presentation
Follow for more stories like this:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
❤️ Sign Up my Medium Email List
❤️ Twitter: @teriradichel
❤️ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/teriradichel
❤️ Mastodon: @teriradichel@infosec.exchange
❤️ Facebook: 2nd Sight Lab
❤️ YouTube: @2ndsightlab
Lambda
Deploy
Container
Scp
Function
Recommended from ReadMedium