References
References
Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32.
Ahrens, S. (2017). How to Take Smart Notes: One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking–for Students, Academics and Nonfiction Book Writers. Sönke Ahrens.
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.
Anderson, R.C. & Biddle, W.B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 9, pp. 89–132. New York: Academic Press.
Andre, M. E., & Anderson, T. H. (1978). The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 605–623.
Badali, S., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2023). How do Students Regulate Their Use of Multiple Choice Practice Tests?. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 43.
Bannert, M. and P. Reimann (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40(1), 193–211.
Brown, M. D. (2007). I’ll have mine annotated, please: Helping students make connections with texts. English Journal, 96(4), 73–78.
Bugg, J. M., DeLosh, E. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). Improving students’ study habits by demonstrating the mnemonic benefits of semantic processing. Teaching of Psychology, 35(2), 96–98.
Carol Porter-O’Donnell. (2004). Beyond the Yellow Highlighter: Teaching Annotation Skills to Improve Reading Comprehension. The English Journal, 93(5), 82–89.
Chiu, C. H., Wu, C. Y., & Cheng, H. W. (2013). Integrating reviewing strategies into shared electronic note-taking: Questioning, summarizing and note reading. Computers & Education, 67, 229–238.
Chiung-Hui Chiu, Hsiao-Wei Cheng & Chiu-Yi Wu (2016). Applying questioning or reading strategy to review technology enhanced co edited notes of elementary school students, The Journal of Educational Research, 109:2, 111–121.
Cohen, M., & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students’ writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 143–159.
Cordón-García, J. A., Alonso-Arévalo, J., Gómez-Díaz, R., & Linder, D. (2013). Social reading: platforms, applications, clouds and tags. Elsevier.
Craik, F. & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2014). The systematic design of instruction. (8th ed.). Pearson.
Engelbart, D. (1962). A conceptual framework for augmenting man’s intellect. In Howerton and Weeks (eds.) Vistas in information handling. Pp. 1–29.
Forte, T. (2022). Building a Second Brain: A Proven Method to Organize Your Digital Life and Unlock Your Creative Potential. Simon and Schuster
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Grabe, M., Flannery, K., & Christopherson, K. (2008). Voluntary use of online study questions as a function of previous minimal use requirements and learner aptitude. Internet and Higher Education. 11, 145–151.
Grabe, M. & Grabe, C. (2018). Integrating technology for meaningful learning. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07WLS7PWC
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). They say, I say: The moves that matter in academic writing (3rd ed). WW Norton.
Greving, S., & Richter, T. (2018). Examining the testing effect in university teaching: Retrievability and question format matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2412.
Grimstad, K., & Grabe, M. (2004). Are online study questions beneficial? Teaching of Psychology, 31(2), 143–146.
Hamaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of educational research, 56(2), 212–242.
Hartley, J., Bartlett, S., & Branthwaite, A. (1980). Underlining can make a difference — sometimes. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(4), 218–224.
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Providing the instructor’s notes: An effective addition to student notetaking. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 33–39.
Kiewra, K. 1989. A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review. 1(2), 147–172.
Kiewra, K., S. Benton, S. Kim, N. Risch, and M. Christensen. (1995). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology 20(2), 172–187.
King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111–126.
Kornell, N., & Vaughn, K. E. (2016). How retrieval attempts affect learning: A review and synthesis. Psychology of learning and motivation, 65, 183–215.
Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44, 46–53.
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016). Argue with Me: Argument as a Path to Developing Students’ Thinking and Writing.
Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455–463.
Lee, K. (2012). Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends, 56(2), 13–21.
Lee, H. Y., & List, A. (2019). Processing of texts and videos: A strategy‐focused analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 268–282.
Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2015). Improving students’ science text comprehension through metacognitive self-regulation when applying learning strategies. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 313–346.
Lin, L. M., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(4), 345–391.
Lorch, R.F. & Lorch, E.P. (1995). Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 537–544.
Mu, X. (2010). “Towards effective video annotation: An approach to automatically link notes with video content.” Computers & Education 55(4): 1752–1763.
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science, 25(6), 1159–1168.
Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Korndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1126–1144.
Pyc, M.A., Agarwal, P.K., & Roediger, H.L. (2014). Test enhanced learning. Benassi, V.A., Overson, C. E. & Hakala, C. M. (Eds.). Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology website: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php
Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52–67.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479–530.
Rothkopf, E. Z. (1970). The concept of mathemagenic activities. Review of educational research, 40(3), 325–336.
Rothkopf, E. Z. & Billington, M. J. (1974). Indirect review and priming through questions. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 66(5), 669–679.
Rothkopf, E. Z., & Bisbicos, E. E. (1967). Selective facilitative effects of interspersed questions on learning from written materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 56.
Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432.
Tobias, S. (1989). Using computers to study consistency of cognitive processing of instruction. Computers in human behavior, 5(2), 107–118.
van der Meer, J. (2012). Students’ note-taking challenges in the twenty-first century: Considerations for teachers and academic staff developers. Teaching in higher education, 17(1), 13–23.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Walczyk, J. J., & Hall, V. C. (1989). Effects of examples and embedded questions on the accuracy of comprehension self-assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 435.
White, A. (2016). Using digital think‐alouds to build comprehension of online informational texts. The reading teacher, 69(4), 421–425.
Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational psychologist, 24(4), 345–376.