The AI vs. Human Arms Race
Medium Is Not Going To Save Us in the Fight Against AI
Undisclosed AI scammers presently have the upper hand. We can fight back, but we have to be smart about it ourselves

If you suspect a lot of content you’re seeing is unacknowledged AI-generated text, you’re right.
So many of us pour our hearts and souls out onto the page, only to see shameless grifters flooding the field with machine garbage.
It drives hard-working Medium authors crazy, and with good reason. With a fraction of the time and effort we invest, AI-wielding thieves are stealing away attention.
Some of you are thinking, “Wouldn’t it be nice if Medium did some of the work of spotting and blocking these raging opportunists for us?” Yes, of course. But Medium has abdicated responsibility.
Although management says Medium is “a home for human writing, full stop,” we’ve got more moochers living under our roof than the Delta House fraternity.
- Medium’s statement is toothless because there is scant penalty for posting AI-written or AI-assisted stories.
- Medium’s ironically named “Quality Guidelines” do not prohibit unlabeled AI-generated stories, merely restrict their broad distribution.
- To get around even this feeble mechanism, all an AI hack needs to do to stay in Medium’s good graces is say upfront they used AI.
So for now it’s up to us, the Medium community. For those of us who want to fight back, we can fight back.
The only question is how best to do it. I’ve got bad news and good news.
We ain’t going to fix this with our gray matter, sorry
Several fine authors have written guidance on how to tell whether an author is posting AI-generated content. Thanks, R C Hammond!
The tips are good but suffer from two fatal flaws:
- They’re inherently subjective
- Even when they work, they’re massively time-consuming
If you write a lot here, you’ve probably been wrongly accused of using AI yourself. Or maybe rightly. Either way, talk about annoying!
The point is that with a diverse enough group, which Medium certainly contains, reasonable people are going to interpret the same facts differently. The po-TAY-to | po-TAH-to schism is real.
Yes, if you are a super-sleuth, and devote 30 minutes or more to scouring a writer’s profile, checking their posts and comments, you might gain confidence that they’re a con.
Who has the time? And why should we devote so much time to rooting them out? Especially when their remedy is to take five minutes to set up another fake profile and continue on their merry, malicious way?
This is to say nothing of people who use AI for all sorts of legitimate reasons, blurring the lines further. See Wesley van Peer’s excellent rant laying out another side of the story.

It takes a bot to catch a bot
Humans are losing the current battle, but we haven’t lost the war. We just need to employ more powerful tools against the powerful tools arrayed against us.
AI detection tools to the rescue.
We’re in the raging arms race phase of this fight. Ever more sophisticated AI-generated text versus AI detection tools.
Do you know the big difference between AI detection tools and our fallible brains? The tools are not subjective. And they work instantly.
The AI detection tools are trained the same way that large language models are, on huge databases of content. Then, and this is critical, their performance is checked and fine-tuned against known AI-generated content.
In other words, there’s no guesswork when training these tools. The fakes are salted in and there’s no question what is AI-generated. The only question is how to make the tool catch fakes more and more reliably.
In Part 2 of The AI vs. Human Arms Race (coming soon), I review the top-performing AI detection tools.
Do you use any AI detection tools now?
Drop a note in the comments and I’ll make sure to include the tool in the review.
Be well.
Whether you’re a Luddite or a closet cyborg, I love you all. Subscribe to read my stories, and you’ll gain a human fan who is bot-like in his determination to engage with you.






