avatarAvi Kotzer

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

7744

Abstract

ritten in the book of the Law, to do them.”</p></blockquote><blockquote id="38ee"><p>Galatians 3:11-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="f37d"><p><b>11 </b>Now, that no one is justified by the Law before God is evident; for, “the righteous one will live by faith.”</p></blockquote><blockquote id="dc38"><p>Galatians 6:15-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="d57a"><p><b>15 </b>For neither is circumcision anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="73d6"><p>Romans 3:20-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="7be2"><p><b>20 </b>because by the works of the Law none of mankind will be justified in His sight; for through the Law <i>comes</i> knowledge of sin.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="7c07"><p>Romans 9:31-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="02da"><p><b>31 </b>however, Israel, pursuing a law of righteousness, did not arrive at <i>that</i> law.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="4b02"><p>2 Corinthians 3:14–15-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="cf89"><p><b>14 </b>But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ. <b>15 </b>But to this day whenever Moses is read, a veil lies over their hearts;</p></blockquote><p id="6847"><b>Staunchly for?</b></p><blockquote id="2e86"><p>Romans 3:1-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="e1f1"><p><b>3 </b>Then what advantage does the Jew have? Or what is the benefit of circumcision?</p></blockquote><blockquote id="f0c0"><p>Romans 3:31-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="dcec"><p><b>31 </b>Do we then nullify the Law through faith? Far from it! On the contrary, we establish the Law.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="247b"><p>Romans 7:7-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="dd4c"><p><b>7 </b>What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.”</p></blockquote><blockquote id="c2f4"><p>Romans 7:12-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="5132"><p><b>12 </b>So then, the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="1fdd"><p>Romans 9:4-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="6f3f"><p><b>4 </b>who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons <i>and daughters</i>, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the Law, the <i>temple</i> service, and the promises;</p></blockquote><blockquote id="48c4"><p>Romans 11:1-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="4154"><p><b>11 </b>I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? Far from it! For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="1a8e"><p>Romans 11:26-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="9e60"><p><b>26 </b>and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written:</p></blockquote><blockquote id="677b"><p>“The Deliverer will come from Zion, He will remove ungodliness from Jacob.”</p></blockquote><blockquote id="515c"><p>Galatians 3:21-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="33c3"><p><b>21 </b>Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God? Far from it! For if a law had been given that was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law.</p></blockquote><p id="544c">Often you’ll see Christians try to excuse these contradictions as not being contradictions due to the time or context of the writing, but here we have verses taken from just two of Paul’s authentic writings that contain numerous contradictions coinciding in the two books.</p><p id="85d0">Paul often gives me a used car salesman vibe, or alternatively, a politician, speaking out of both sides of his mouth. A classic demagogue tactic when attempting to gain as much of a following as one can.</p><h2 id="c56d">Paul vs Jesus-On the Second Coming of Christ</h2><blockquote id="970f"><p>Romans 13:12-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="5b95"><p>12 The night is almost gone, and the day is near. Therefore let’s rid ourselves of the deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light.</p></blockquote><p id="0a2f"><b>VS</b></p><blockquote id="036e"><p>Luke 21:8-NASB</p></blockquote><blockquote id="cc61"><p>8 And He said, “See to it that you are not misled; for many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am <i>He</i>,’ and, ‘The time is near.’ Do not go after them.</p></blockquote><p id="0a74">It seems Paul could’ve avoided so many contradicting statements with Christ had he actually met him, or just made himself more familiar with what Jesus had said during his ministry.</p><h2 id="f356">Jesus vs Paul-God of the Dead</h2><blockquote id="aebf"><p>Romans 14:9-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="0266"><p><b>9 </b>For to this <i>end</i> Christ died and lived <i>again</i>, that He might be Lord both of the dead and of the living.</p></blockquote><p id="73d2"><b>VS</b></p><blockquote id="4390"><p>Luke 20:38-NASB</p></blockquote><blockquote id="6ef1"><p><b>38 </b>Now He is not the God of the dead, but of the living; for all live to Him.”</p></blockquote><p id="077b">At first glance, this one looks like a clear contradiction, but upon looking at it a bit deeper you can see the context that Jesus is saying that all souls are alive to God, which may make you think this isn’t a contradiction.</p><p id="52fa">But what I see is that Jesus said that God is the God of all souls, and all are alive to him, while Paul says that Jesus had to die and be resurrected to be the Lord of both the living and the dead, how is that necessary if you believe Jesus is God?</p><p id="9ec4">It seems like Paul made up quite a bit on the fly.</p><h2 id="a77a">Paul vs Jesus-Forgiveness</h2><blockquote id="f264"><p>Ephesians 1:7-NASB (disputed Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="7799"><p><b>7 </b>In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our wrongdoings, according to the riches of His grace</p></blockquote><blockquote id="6ea3"><p>Romans 4:25-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="e2a6"><p><b>25 </b><i>He</i> who was delivered over because of our wrongdoings, and was raised because of our justification.</p></blockquote><p id="f49e"><b>VS</b></p><blockquote id="5ac7"><p>Matthew 6:14–15-NASB</p></blockquote><blockquote id="6fe8"><p><b>14 </b>For if you forgive <i>other</i> people for their offenses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. <b>15 </b>But if you do not forgive <i>other</i> people, then your Father will not forgive your offenses.</p></blockquote><p id="2b52">This is another example of Paul pushing the concept of people being forgiven strictly for their faith in Jesus, vs Jesus’ message that people need to actively forgive others, to actively make internal changes in themselves, to receive the same from forgiveness from God.</p><h2 id="9250">Paul vs Jesus-The True Gospel</h2><blockquote id="7ee2"><p>1 Corinthians 2:13-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="a75d"><p><b>13 </b>We also speak these things, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining spiritual <i>thoughts</i> with spiritual <i>words</i>.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="dec1"><p>Galatians 1:12-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="91eb"><p><b>12 </b>For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but <i>I received it</i> through a revelation of Jesus Christ.</p></blockquote><p id="308d"><b>VS</b></p><blockquote id="e515"><p>John 17:14-NASB</p></blockquote><blockquot

Options

e id="66fa"><p><b>14 </b>I have given them Your word; and the world has hated them because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. <b>17 </b>Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth.</p></blockquote><p id="d474">This one also doesn’t appear to be a contradiction on the surface, but when you consider the huge doctrinal differences between Paul’s teachings and Jesus’, then consider that Paul says he received his gospel from Jesus, and Jesus is speaking to God at this point saying he already gave God’s word to the world but that they’ve hated it… you hopefully can see the issue here.</p><p id="63f0">Either Jesus changed his message up a whole lot after resurrection and ascension, in which case we need to put his earthly ministry under scrutiny, or Paul is lying and made up much of his teaching on his own, including content that contradicts Jesus’.</p><h2 id="e4e2">Paul vs Jesus-How to be Justified</h2><blockquote id="fe34"><p>Romans 3:24-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="fa7f"><p><b>24 </b>being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, <b>28 </b>For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="1f20"><p>Romans 5:9-NASB (authentic Paul)</p></blockquote><blockquote id="c84d"><p><b>9 </b>Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from the wrath <i>of God</i> through Him.</p></blockquote><p id="e473"><b>VS</b></p><blockquote id="e3b3"><p>Matthew 12:37-NASB</p></blockquote><blockquote id="9335"><p><b>37 </b>For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”</p></blockquote><p id="247c">Yet another example of Paul telling everyone they are good due to Jesus’ sacrifice and essentially have a free pass, while Jesus is saying that their words, whether those be kind or hurtful will show the real contents of their heart or soul.</p><p id="aa04">Again, Jesus promotes works, and actions while Paul promotes a message completely contrary to it.</p><p id="b624">I’ve honestly been surprised by how much of the Christian religion is based on Paul’s teaching, and how many discrepancies I’m finding between his message and that of Jesus.</p><p id="ab76">Given how these discrepancies keep cropping up I may end up making another installment on this subject, stay tuned.</p><div id="f61d" class="link-block"> <a href="https://medium.com/@ReligionandPoliticsDiscussed/subscribe"> <div> <div> <h2>Get an email whenever Religion and Politics at The Dinner Table publishes.</h2> <div><h3>Get an email whenever Religion and Politics at The Dinner Table publishes. By signing up, you will create a Medium…</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/0*gG5hJXyc73sEBd5R)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="a295" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/the-bibles-two-nativity-stories-f08fa375de1b"> <div> <div> <h2>The Bible’s Two Nativity Stories</h2> <div><h3>Let’s explore the two stories we thought were one</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*qCooY0b1UCsPdwIjQ9dOhQ.jpeg)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="e4c9" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/did-jesus-claim-to-be-god-463cf415d0fe"> <div> <div> <h2>Did Jesus Claim to Be God?</h2> <div><h3>How the tale evolved</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*jtsT0GNO8gRi-PBRFCxcDg.jpeg)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="b673" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/jesus-christ-vs-saint-paul-d0d55f89298d"> <div> <div> <h2>Jesus Christ vs Saint Paul</h2> <div><h3>Was Paul one of the false prophets Jesus warned us about?</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*9Q_jTruqB9baEXTYHh-VPA.jpeg)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="6f6b" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/christians-hang-ups-with-sex-d4af1c179f4d"> <div> <div> <h2>Christians’ Hang-Ups With Sex</h2> <div><h3>What does Jesus have to say on the topic?</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*vJijKMnSdDbDsZ4N9aw2BA.jpeg)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="414a" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/the-bible-doesnt-condemn-homosexuality-a81e2ed4f857"> <div> <div> <h2>The Bible Doesn’t Condemn Homosexuality</h2> <div><h3>Image made with Dall-E-3</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*sE4YtAM2ON4nKD1G99OT1w.jpeg)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="efb4" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/hell-doesnt-exist-in-the-bible-3d41226bf75b"> <div> <div> <h2>Hell Doesn’t Exist in the Bible</h2> <div><h3>Image Created By Author</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*gDoGCgQueEVZe3MuXa4gCQ.png)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="76fb" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/the-trinity-doesnt-exist-in-the-bible-a8604610537b"> <div> <div> <h2>The Trinity Doesn’t Exist in The Bible</h2> <div><h3>Another concept that Christians cooked up</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*mX8znMK6WPDoxN4uaa8deA.jpeg)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div><div id="f63d" class="link-block"> <a href="https://readmedium.com/gay-couples-in-the-bible-1e777ccb477d"> <div> <div> <h2>Gay Couples in the Bible</h2> <div><h3>A discussion of gay couples in the Bible</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/1*FgsSUOgrkUvus490QsrFug.png)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div></article></body>

Macaco/a

A monkey, a martial arts technique… and an infamous slur

Photo by Alexandra Mirgheș on Unsplash

Today’s New York Times Spelling Bee letters:

Art: Iva Reztok

C, I, L, M, O, Y, and center A (all words must include A)

Merriam-Webster says…

Credit: merriam-webster.com

Silly little dictionary! Don’t you know macaco can’t possibly be a word if the New York Times says it ain’t?

For further fascinating facts, check out the Spelling Bee Master.

What’s your favorite dord* from today’s puzzle?

My Two Cents

The word macaco should conjure up only positive feelings. It’s related to cute monkeys, after all, as well as a martial art with UNESCO cultural heritage status and a multicultural musical project.

But it also has an ugly history as a racial slur that was brought to the forefront of American consciousness in the 2006 United States Senate election in Virginia.

Old World monkeys and New World martial arts

Macaca is a genus of monkeys that has 23 species in Asia, North Africa, and even Gibraltar. The English word for this genus is macaque. These social primates arrange their social groups around dominant females, are found in a bunch of habitats, and adapt very quickly and easily to new environments. A few species have even learned to live with humans and have become invasive in some cases.

The type species (the species that contains the biological type specimen) is the Macaca sylvanus,or Barbary macaque, but there are other interesting species, too.

Screenshot collage by Iva Reztok

That macaque all the way on the right, the rhesus, has been used extensively in scientific research. The Rh blood group system we commonly use (positive/negative) is named for the monkey because Karl Landsteiner and Alexander S. Wiener, who discovered it in 1937, believed it was a similar antigen found in rhesus macaque red blood cells. (It was later proven that the monkey and human factors were not identical.)

The macaco is a move in the Brazilian martial art of capoeira that originated during the 16th and 17th centuries as a way for African slaves to survive in a hostile environment when they were able to escape their Portuguese colonial owners. The slaves who had managed to liberate themselves established their own settlements, known as quilombos, in places that were hard to reach. Quilombos grew and expanded when more fugitive slaves, Brazilian natives, and even some Europeans escaping the law joined them.

The macaco is basically a back handspring in which the capoerista starts from a low crouch with one hand towards the back. The move is known as the “monkey jump”; hence macaco, which means “monkey” in Portuguese.

Amy Bond wrote an interesting piece on the macaco move right here on Medium, and included several instructive videos. Check them out!

Macaco is also the stage name of Daniel Carbonell de las Heras, a Spanish musical artist born in Barcelona. His music is a mix of rumba, reggae, and funk. He started out as a street musician and was able to recruit artists from Brazil, Cameroon, Venezuela, and Spain to start his own multicultural project, also known as Macaco. His songs feature lyrics in several languages, including Spanish, Portuguese, French, English, Catalan, and Italian.

A man “ahead” of his time…

In 2006, George Allen, former Virginia governor and son of NFL hall-of-fame coach George Herbert Allen, was running for reelection as a U.S. senator on the Republican ticket against Democrat James H. Webb, Jr., former Secretary of the Navy. On August 11, at a campaign stop in Breaks, Virginia, Allen said this about S. R. Sidarth, who was filming the event for the Webb campaign:

This fellow here over here with the yellow shirt, Macaca, or whatever his name is. He’s with my opponent…. Let’s give a welcome to Macaca, here. Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia.

S. R. Sidarth did not need to be welcomed to America or Virginia, having been born and raised in that state. But I guess he did receive a good dose of the “real world” of hate speech when several people in the audience applauded Allen’s comments.

As I mentioned earlier, macaca (feminine) and macaco (masculine) are the Portuguese words for “monkey”. Unfortunately, in Portugal and Portuguese-speaking countries, macaco had been frequently used as a racial slur against black people. Historically, a similar French term — macaque — was used as an epithet by Belgians when referring to people in African countries during the time they were colonies of the European nation.

The video of Allen’s speech went viral and he was forced to issue an apology a couple of weeks later. However, it’s likely his racist sentiment ended up making the difference in an election he lost by less than half of one percent of the vote. This despite the fact that he ran a blatantly right-wing campaign during which the Marshall-Newman Amendment, defining marriage as solely between one man and one woman, was also on the ballot.

Allen was a decade “ahead” of his time, and those quotes around the word ahead are meant to be sarcastic and cynical. If 2016 proved anything, it’s that polarizing and prejudiced comments now get you more votes and support. I can’t imagine Allen losing an election in Virginia today after saying what he said ten years ago.

Heck, he’d probably endear himself to many people. The sad truth in politics is that the more things change, the more they stay the same. Politics is just an eternal Broadway play in which different actors play the same roles. Our societies seemed to slowly progress in the late 20th century only to enter into a slow but sure regression at the beginning of the new millennium.

Who knows… perhaps that’s why the editors of the Spelling Bee decided that macaco should remain a dord*.

You can check out my previous entry on another dord* here:

*What the heck is a dord, you ask? Here’s the answer:

Spelling Bee
Language
Politics
Race
Sports
Recommended from ReadMedium