avatarHenya Drescher

Summary

The website content discusses the prevalence of moral judgment in society, the rise of political bullying, and the challenges to freedom of expression and constructive debate due to polarization and fear of judgment.

Abstract

In an era where moral judgment permeates all aspects of life, individuals and authorities are pressured to align with popular political movements and avoid public backlash, particularly on social media. The article highlights the persistent issue of bullying, which manifests in both personal and professional settings, and has escalated in politics, leading to a culture of intolerance and disrespect for diverse opinions. This environment of polarization and fear suppresses honest discourse and peaceful protest, undermining democratic processes and the right to freedom of expression. The piece argues that moral judgments should be made with rational thought rather than through name-calling or threats, advocating for a return to civil debate and thoughtful discourse on reform proposals.

Opinions

  • Moral judgment is increasingly influencing public and private actions, often driven by fear of reprisal rather than genuine moral orientation.
  • Political bullying and shaming are on the rise, contributing to a culture that discourages civility and respect for differing viewpoints.
  • The current state of polarization is detrimental to democracy, as it hinders constructive debates and open dialogue.
  • People are hesitant to express their true opinions due to the fear of being judged or labeled, which is exacerbated by extremist behavior.
  • The use of moral judgments as weapons to mobilize support is seen as undermining rational debate and legitimate arguments for reform.
  • There is a call for a more responsible and rational approach to moral judgment, free from intimidation and violence.

Judge, and be Prepared to be Judged

Nothing is exempt from moral judgment

Book of Judges Chapter 8–3 courtesy Wikimedia Commons

In a world where nothing is exempt from moral judgment, being on-trend means signing up for radical political movements.

Those in positions of authority are scrambling to show they are addressing endemic racism, and in the commercial sphere, not ending up on the wrong side of the debate and risking Twitter storms and boycotts. Such action is not morally oriented but driven by fear and reprisal.

Sadly, bullies are a fact of life

Whether we are on the playground or in the workplace, there will always be people who feel compelled to build themselves up by tearing down others.

Civility in politics has been decreasing for a long time. Political bullying and shaming have to do with the ability to insult others on the Internet, in the media, etc. Consequently, it is not surprising that people have become emboldened by their use of words. This has become painfully clear in recent years as disagreements have become volatile, highlighting a culture of intolerance and disrespect towards the heterogeneity of opinion.

Polarization is damaging, posing a challenge to the democratic process. Polarized individuals often refuse to engage with each other, automatically dismissive both of potential flaws in their own views and the potential merits of their other opponents. Under these conditions, constructive debates are impossible.

As a result, people are afraid to be honest about what they think for fear of being judged or labeled. ​Extremists have taken to the streets harassing opponents and anyone they disagree with, making a mockery of the long-cherished American tradition of peaceful protest.

It’s bullying, and it’s time we call it what it is

This undermines the right to freedom of expression. Bullying creates an environment in which the self-expression of others is suppressed.

In modern American history, bullying has morphed into the go-to tactic as an attempt to quash opponents through fear, the threat of force, violence, and rhetorical intimidation on every major issue facing America today. Play the race card, the class card, and the sexism card. Use any and every means at your disposal to demonize your opposition — to shut them up. Then pretend that such bullying is justified.

People’s social and political opinions are grounded in their moral concerns about right and wrong. But to pronounce moral judgment is an enormous responsibility. It requires the most rational process of thought. And not one which engages in name-calling, shaming, labeling, and sometimes even threats of violence.

There’s a legitimate debate to be had about reform proposals. But moral utterances used as weapons to mobilize others to support one’s cause undermine good arguments for changing the way anything works in America.

Bullying
Judgement
Opinion
Morality
Internet
Recommended from ReadMedium