avatarSmillew Rahcuef

Summary

The article discusses the strategic and ethical considerations of a couple who monetize their seven children's images online, navigating legal loopholes while maintaining ethical standards and profitability.

Abstract

The authors, who are online writers and creators specializing in parenting and education, initially started their venture as a side hustle before scaling it up. They consulted with lawyers to understand the legal aspects of using their children's images online, deciding against exploiting legal loopholes that could harm their children's well-being. Despite the challenges of childcare, they chose to have more children, including twins, to maximize their income potential, ensuring to obtain consent from their children for the use of their images, particularly before treats like ice cream or hot cocoa. The couple has found the most profitable age range for 'kidfluencers' to be from 0 to 24 months, with a humorous approach extending profitability up to 48 months. They recommend various platforms for different stages of childhood and are considering expanding their business through adoption and exploring cryptocurrency and NFTs. The article, written by a Medium satirist, concludes with an invitation to a course on profiting from children's images and a subtle self-promotion of the author's other satirical works.

Opinions

  • The couple views their children as a means to generate income, with a particular emphasis on the financial potential of having multiple children.
  • They pride themselves on their ethical approach to not directly exploiting legal loopholes that could be detrimental to their children's privacy and mental health.
  • The authors believe in the concept of 'ethical entrepreneurship,' suggesting it is possible to be both morally responsible and financially successful.
  • They strategically time requests for consent to use their children's images, implying that the children may not fully understand the implications of their consent.
  • The article satirizes the trend of 'kidfluencers' and the commodification of children's images on social media, highlighting the short shelf-life of child influencers and the need to constantly adapt to maintain profitability.
  • The authors are considering diversifying their revenue streams through adoption, cryptocurrency, and NFTs, indicating a forward-thinking approach to maintaining their business's relevance and growth.
  • The satirical tone suggests a critique of the influencer culture and the lengths to which some parents may go to monetize their children's lives.

I Have Seven Kids, and That’s a Lot

Ms Gepp took this lovely picture

My wife and I are online writers and creators specializing in the topics of parenting and education. It started as a side hustle. After two years, we decided to go all-in and scale.

Upon consultation with our lawyers, we realized several juridical loopholes existed when exploiting children’s images online, ruining their childhood, and destroying their overall mental health.

It was a unicorn type of opportunity, but it meant having children.

It was a tough choice because we knew from previous babysitting experiences that taking care of children isn’t exactly a joke or a fun hobby. Nevertheless, we were committed to making a shitload of money and decided to have some. Luckily, we got twins on the third try. They’re our biggest earners by far. So far.

As ethical entrepreneurs, we also made the (costly) choice of not taking advantage directly of these loopholes. As responsible parents, we ask our children for consent before using their images for money-making purposes online.

We do it when they’re the most receptive to serious discussions. After some trials and errors, we realized that the right moment was just before giving them ice cream (summertime) or hot cocoa (wintertime).

Even if they had to skip a meal or two, our children always gave their consent so far. We take pride in proving that ethical entrepreneurship is possible and profitable.

You might be wondering why we have as many as seven children.

Sorry for speaking in jargon; it’s because the shelf-life of kidfluencers is short.

The 0 to 24 months period is the most profitable. 24 to 48 months is also not too bad if you give it a funny twist. For example, by having them lecture about bitcoins or politics.

Afterward, you can still milk them as far as (hopefully) their mid-teens, but the return on investment is nothing as high as with babies.

For babies, we recommend Instagram and TikTok. Switching to selling products on Gumroad isn’t a good idea before they reach 6–7 years. Writing articles about your adventures on a blog and having a Twitter account is a must — no matter the age.

What’s next?

We are currently looking for ways to expand our business. Adoption is a lead we’re exploring in detail, as it could bring a diversity angle to our operations. Other possibilities include launching a cryptocurrency called BabyCoin or selling NFTs of diapers. It would cater to the needs of the more tech-savvy part of our audience.

We hope this article inspired you and that we’ll soon see your children on social media. Don’t worry; we don’t see you as competition but as opportunities for cross-pollination content.

And, who knows? Maybe you’ll want to join our cohort-based course titled “from 0 to Millionaire, how to profit from your kids’ image.”

Smillew is a Medium satirist who writes mainly about social justice, his Medium newsletter, and his Medium referral link. No need to follow him; he’ll show up in your feed.

Satire
Social Media
Influencer Marketing
Kids
Social Justice
Recommended from ReadMedium