avatarBill Myers

Summary

The Texas Abortion Law has been criticized for legalizing extortion, reinstating torture, reversing the presumption of innocence, redefining pregnancy, and encouraging vigilantism, among other serious legal and ethical concerns.

Abstract

The author of the web content expresses deep shame and concern over the Supreme Court's handling of the Texas Abortion Law. This law is seen as a regression in legal standards, as it introduces provisions that legalize extortion by allowing individuals to sue abortion providers or those who assist in the procedure, with the potential for the plaintiff to receive up to $10,000, even if the defendant wins the case. It is accused of reinstating torture through specific sections of the law, reversing the long-standing principle of "Innocent until Proven Guilty," and redefining pregnancy in a way that could lead to unfounded legal actions against women who have menstrual periods. The law is also criticized for promoting self-abortions, using the courts for political goals, instituting vigilantism by allowing anyone to bring a suit, and creating a system of unequal protection under the law, particularly regarding gender roles and responsibilities. The author argues that the law could potentially void the 13th Amendment by forcing women into 18 years of labor, given the narrow window to obtain an abortion. The article suggests that the law's structure requires every section to be challenged individually, and it highlights the potential for copycat laws in other areas, such as gun control.

Opinions

  • The Supreme Court's decision on the Texas Abortion Law is seen as a disaster for the rule of law.
  • The law is criticized for effectively legalizing extortion by rewarding plaintiffs in abortion-related lawsuits.
  • The author believes the law reintroduces torture as a legal concept, contrary to modern legal standards.
  • The principle of "Innocent until Proven Guilty" is perceived to be reversed, placing the burden of proof on the defendant.
  • The redefinition of pregnancy in the law is considered problematic, as it could lead to legal action against women who have never been sexually active.
  • The law is seen as encouraging dangerous self-abortions due to its broad definition of pregnancy.
  • The use of civil suits for political goals is viewed as an abuse of the legal system.
  • The law's structure, which requires individual challenges to each section, is criticized for complicating its potential repeal.
  • The author argues that the law promotes vigilantism by allowing non-affected parties to sue.
  • There is a perceived lack of equal protection under the law, as men are not held responsible under the new legislation.
  • The author suggests that the law could be interpreted as forcing women into involuntary labor, in violation of the 13th Amendment.
  • The potential for other states to adopt similar laws for different issues, such as gun control, is seen as a dangerous precedent.

TEXAS ABORTION LAW

I Am Really Ashamed of the Supreme Court

For legalizing Extortion, Torture, Vigilantism, Instituting a “Guilty until Proven Innocent” doctrine, and redefining “Pregnancy”. At least Sotomayor, Breyer, and Kagan have sense.

Photo by Adam Szuscik on Unsplash

Judge Sotomayor’s dissent states: “This case is a disaster for the rule of law…”

and this list shows why. Abortion is even secondary to other horrible provisions in that law.

If the Supreme Court does not strike down the entire Texas Abortion law, they will:

1) Legalize Extortion! The extortionist may receive up to $10,000. The defendant must always pay something, at least the legal fees, even if the defendant wins.

2) Reinstate Torture! SECTION 8.(a)(4)(B) & (D)

3) Reverse the “Innocent until Proven Guilty” doctrine! Sec. 171.208., (f-1)

4) Redefine Pregnancy! SECTION 3, SUBCHAPTER H, (5). By definition, a woman who has never had sex can be pregnant.

5) Encourages Self-Abortions! Every woman who has a menstrual period, by that pregnancy definition, can be sued by anyone in the state of Texas for an assumed abortion!

6) Uses the courts for political goals via civil suits! To meet the “equal protection of the laws” portion of the 14th Amendment, they need to expand the extortion rights to all people for all actions. Failure to expand such lawsuits to everything would be discrimination.

7) Severance —Splits a Court Decision! SECTION 10. Every single section of the bill must be challenged and thrown out by the court. If a section is not explicitly included in a ruling, it remains in effect.

8) Institute Vigilantism! Allows anybody to bring suit, even when they have no direct interest.

9) Unequal Protection under the Law! Men have no responsibility! The law should make the man named by the woman pay child support until age 18. The defendant must be forced to pay something, at least the legal fees, even if the defendant wins, as established by the #1 extortion point.

10) Void the 13th amendment! Forces the woman into 18 years of forced labor. Based on the pregnancy definition, the woman may have only 1 or 2 weeks to find a doctor and get an abortion from the time she knows she is pregnant — an impossible task.

If I came to this conclusion about its main points, Sleazy lawyers will too and exploit it.

It has already started with the sleazy lawyers in state legislatures:

References

  • For more details, see my expanded article
  • Logic for using the 13th Amendment

Other Articles in the Same Category

Abortion
Supreme Court
Equal Protection
Hypocrisy
Roe V Wade
Recommended from ReadMedium