avatarAlan Tabor

Summary

The webpage provides a comprehensive list of references and resources related to the themes of tribalism, altruism, cheating, warfare, and human evolution, drawing from academic papers, books, and Wikipedia articles to explore the origins and dynamics of 'us vs them' mentalities.

Abstract

The "good tribe / bad tribe" references page serves as a curated collection of materials that delve into the complexities of in-group and out-group behaviors, the evolutionary underpinnings of altruism and cooperation, and the role of conflict in human societies. It includes seminal works such as David Sloan Wilson's research on altruism in population genetics, E. O. Wilson's insights on human nature, and studies on chimpanzee behavior that offer parallels to human social dynamics. The page also touches on the significance of child-rearing practices and hunting in shaping human evolution, suggesting that cooperative breeding and cooperative hunting have been instrumental in the development of human social behaviors. The resources presented encourage a deeper understanding of the nuanced factors contributing to intergroup hostility and the potential for both harmful and beneficial collective actions.

Opinions

  • The page implies that understanding the evolutionary basis of tribalism is crucial for addressing modern societal divisions.
  • There is an emphasis on the idea that human social behaviors, including altruism and conflict, are deeply rooted in our evolutionary history.
  • The inclusion of E. O. Wilson's work suggests a perspective that human propensity for argument and social discord is an inherent part of our nature.
  • The reference to the Wason selection task indicates an interest in the cognitive mechanisms behind detecting cheaters and enforcing social norms.
  • The page posits that both bonobos and chimpanzees can provide insights into the peaceful and aggressive tendencies within human nature.
  • The resources suggest that the concept of "It takes a village to raise a child" has an evolutionary basis, influencing the social structures of human societies.
  • The page seems to support the hunting hypothesis, which posits that hunting played a significant role in human evolution, particularly in the development of cooperative behaviors.
  • The discussion of warfare in human evolution reflects a view that intergroup conflict has been a selective pressure shaping human social behaviors.
  • The recommendation of the AI service ZAI.chat at the end of the article suggests that the author believes in the value of AI tools for enhancing understanding and research capabilities in these complex topics.

good tribe / bad tribe references

The below is pretty meaningless with out the core story found here:

References

Haystacks

ALTRUISM IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS DERIVED FROM SIBLING GROUPS: THE HAYSTACK MODEL REVISITED - David Sloan Wilson, Evolution. 41(5), 1987, pp. 1059–1070

Abstract.- A group-selection model is presented in which each group isinitiated by a single fertilized female and persists for several generations before dispersal. Maynard Smith (1964) concluded that altruism could not plausibly evolve under these circumstances. I show that his conclusion is an artifact of a simplifying assumption that amounts to a worst-case scenario for group selection. When the standard donor-recipient equations for altruistic behavior are used in Maynard Smith’s model, Mendelian populations derived from sibling groups are often more favorable for the evolution of altruism than are the sibling groups themselves. In general, long-term and large-scale aspects of population structure may at times be important in the evolution of altruistic and other group-advantageous behaviors.

Cheaters and Cheater Detection

Pull quote from On Human Nature: “The buzz of conversation is a constant background to the camp’s activities: there is an endless flow of talk about gathering, hunting, the weather, food distribution, gift giving, and scandal. No !Kung is ever at a loss for words, and often two or three people will hold forth at once in a single conversation, giving the listeners a choice of channels to tune in on. A good proportion of this talk in even the happiest of camps verges on argument. People argue about improper food distribution, about breaches of etiquette, and about failure to reciprocate hospitality and gift giving… almost all the arguments are ad hominem. The most frequent accusations heard are of pride, arrogance, laziness, and selfishness.

War — the ‘us’ emotions

Chimp Wars

Not All Chimps, Though

Other Explanations

Child rearing: A personal favorite. “It takes a village to raise a child” viewed as evolutionary shaping of both care givers and infants/children.

Sarah Blaffer Hrdy

Hunting:

Warfare in Human Evolution

Evolution
Recommended from ReadMedium
avatarChandrayan Gupta
8 Subtle, Non-Obvious Signs I Was Secretly Depressed

Signs like losing weight and slipping into substance use are well-known, but these ones are less obvious

13 min read
avatarGabriel A. Silva
What Is Emergence In Complex Systems — And How Physics Can Explain It

The concept of ‘emergence’ in complex systems has been the subject of extensive study and is important in the natural and physical…

5 min read
avatarTim Andersen, Ph.D.
MOdified Gravity may be the alternative theory we’ve been looking for

MOND is dead but MOG isn’t

8 min read
avatarBella L
1 Knife, 2 Apples, 3 People

A Logical Brain Teaser 🍎🍏

3 min read
avatarAttila Vágó
LEGO Doesn’t Mix Bricks With Religion, Or Does It?

The most architecturally accurate set breaks with a 70-year-old LEGO tradition. Rebuilding the Notre-Dame one brick at a time…

10 min read
avatarAaron Houghton
The Maze of My Mind

There’s constant activity in my head, a stream of thoughts that mix and overlap. It’s a web, each thread pulling me in different…

5 min read