The author is inviting readers to participate in a democratic process by voting on the topic of their next article, emphasizing a shift from algorithmic curation to reader-driven content selection.
Abstract
The author presents a novel approach to content creation by allowing readers to vote on their preferred article topic, thereby relinquishing some control over the writing process. With an ever-growing list of drafts and ideas, the author seeks to align their work with the interests of their audience. This interactive method is a response to the limitations of current content feed algorithms and an attempt to foster a more engaging and personalized reading experience. The poll will determine which of the proposed topics will be developed into a full article, to be published the following Sunday. The author also reflects on previous interactive articles and expresses gratitude to supportive readers, acknowledging the challenges of content visibility within the platform's feed.
Opinions
The author is critical of the current state of content curation on the writing platform, implying it is cluttered with irrelevant material.
There is a desire for more meaningful interaction with the audience, as evidenced by past attempts to create an interactive experience.
The author values reader feedback and is willing to adapt their content to meet audience preferences.
The author uses humor and metaphor to criticize the lack of freedom and control writers have on the platform, comparing themselves and other writers to "hapless howler monkeys" entertaining an audience for little reward.
There is skepticism about the effectiveness of the platform's curation, with the author taking a satirical tone towards the "corporate Corgi curators."
The author is committed to delivering content that is both desired by the readers and of high quality, despite the time constraints and overwhelming number of ideas.
The author expresses a level of dissatisfaction with the transient nature of articles in the "new on your network" feed and the difficulty of reaching a consistent audience.
Cast off the Shackles of Your Feed: Get Your First Taste of Reading Freedom.
Now fans get to choose what they want to read — take this poll!
Ah, the breezy beauty of freedom — unless you live in the path of a brush fire. Prayers to all our neighbors. Photo by Aditya Saxena on Unsplash
My drafts folder is enormous, growing faster than I can delete the ideas I don’t want to use.
Since last night, I had four good ideas for long-form articles — the new Medium medium of exchange — and there isn’t enough time in the day to write 10,000–12,000 words.
Let me correct that.
There isn’t enough time in the day to write 10,000–12,000 well-written, quote filled, citation-backed, not-coming-completely-out-of-my-ass words.
But if I write about one of those four ideas, tomorrow I will have four more ideas I like, and the other ones will get buried in the draft folder.
This dilemma presents two questions:
Which article do I want to write, edit and polish today to be published tomorrow?
Which article do my readers want to read tomorrow?
There’s a good chance I will ignore the subject that interests most people, so why leave it to chance?
As you may or may not know from my past attempts to create a more interactive experience, I love to play with new technology.
In the article below, I gave you, dear reader, the option of choosing to read either the good news first or the bad news first, and even the choice of reading only the good news:
After all, aren’t we all merely hapless howler monkeys rattling the chains that connect us to our digital master and organ grinder Ev Williams, while the audience laughs at our struggles to break free?
But aren’t you entitled to more? After all, aren’t we all merely hapless howler monkeys rattling the chains that connect us to our digital master and organ grinder Ev Williams, while the audience laughs at our struggles to break free?
If we’re going to work for peanuts on this platform (More of an elephant reference, but nobody pays attention to what monkeys eat —people are more concerned with what comes out of the other end), at least we should have some fun and the illusion of freedom, right?
Why concede control to corporate Corgi curators when you could choose the copy you consume?
If I can give you the option to read a story with two different perspectives, why not the option to choose the topic you want?
Since I always complain about the garbage clogging the feed on this writing platform that shall remain nameless (still hoping for curation!), I shall begin the content revolution by giving you readers the power to choose.
Once the votes start rolling in, I will craft the story that you want!
I will cut off the poll on Saturday at 11:59 pm (EDT), then work feverishly through the night to deliver a delicious, piping hot article on the subject of your choice for Sunday brunch (or supper, depending on the depth of the subject matter).
Vote today and show those Corgis who is boss.
The results are in.
Got to give the people, give the people what they want!
Okay, I’m sorry to have to do this, and I promise not to do it again.
Since this article will pass through the bowels of the “new on your network” feed faster than a probiotic prune flaxative, I will call on some of my more regular (no pun intended) fans.
I appreciate all of your highlights and positive comments.