avatarAldric Chen

Summary

The author shares personal insights on avoiding excessive article polishing by adopting a more efficient writing process, inspired by their experience with boot polishing in the military.

Abstract

Drawing from the metaphor of military boot polishing, the author reflects on the tendency to over-polish articles, spending excessive time perfecting them. The article discusses the struggle between producing presentable work and achieving extreme perfection, influenced by the time available, a phenomenon known as Parkinson's Law. The author suggests writing shorter sentences, setting an end-time, and observing article length to streamline the writing process, aiming for a "sweet spot" that balances quality and time investment. The article emphasizes that spending less time polishing can lead to more productive writing without compromising the quality of the work.

Opinions

  • The author believes that the need for writer-perfect work often leads to unnecessary time spent on article polishing.
  • They argue that work, including writing, tends to expand to fill the time allotted, as per Parkinson's Law.
  • The author posits that shorter sentences can significantly reduce writing and editing time while making the text simpler to read and less prone to grammatical errors.
  • Setting a specific end-time for writing sessions can help writers increase their efficiency and finish articles faster.
  • Observing article length and finding the ideal word count for one's genre can prevent time-consuming over-polishing.
  • The author suggests that a 4-minute read, typically around 750 words, is an optimal length for articles, balancing reader engagement and writing effort.
  • They emphasize that the quality of writing should not be sacrificed for the sake of brevity but rather enhanced by more focused writing practices.

Are You Caught in a Never-Ending Loop of Article Polishing? Here’s How I Got Out.

Quit running in circles, shall we?

Polishing your words and work… non-stop? Photo by Andrew Neel on Unsplash

Whoops!

That should be a was.

Ah, geez!

This paragraph is wordy. Prune it!

Oh~ My~ Goodness~

Why was I writing just now? I stopped here… What the heck is next?

Is this you?

Fret not. That was me.

Now? No longer.

We spent too much time polishing our leather boots

This is a popular saying in the military (in Singapore).

And this is the background.

As uniformed personnel, we must present our best at the parade square. The top is pressed, the pants have mid-lines, and the boots must shine.

Our pride is on the line.

And oh, our badges must shine brighter than the son-of-a-b!**h standing beside us too…

How do we do that? Simple.

We polish our boots and badges endlessly. 3 nights before. 2 days prior. Our faces must appear when we look into our boots and badges.

  • “Ah… my precious.”
  • “Wow, my handsome face is finally showing. Darn, a pimple…!!!”
  • “My boots are reflecting the sunlight. The instructor will be blinded by my boots! Yeah!”

We would assemble at the parade square beaming with pride…

… Only to be reprimanded by our senior officers.

“Shiny boots do not make you a patriot! You young punks!”

We ignored them. We were proud. We were reflecting sunlight, man!

That was then.

Now?

This is what I think.

Man, I am such an idiot.

Are you spending too much time polishing your article?

Chances are, you are.

We oscillate between unpresentable work [the lazy us] and extreme perfection [the crazy us]. Both are us.

For me, it depends on disposal time.

This is the funny thing.

I waste more time when I have more time. It’s nuts. If I have 2 available hours to write an article, I would…

  • Speed type the draft,
  • Update, adjust, rewrite my headlines,
  • Edit, polish, prune, bonzai, trim, add quotes, and remove sentences during edit,

… Until the entire 120 minutes is consumed.

The same goes for 50, 60, or 70 minutes.

Weird? Not really.

Cyril Parkinson is right.

He says and I quote,

Work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion.

This is magnified by our need to be writer-perfect.

Wondered why? I have. This is my list of reasons.

  • Searching for THAT punchline to be positioned at the introduction of the introduction,
  • Tightening the synchronicity between our introduction and conclusion,
  • Deliberating between single-line sentences or bullet points,
  • Keeping our introductions to a 100-word limit,
  • Adding hyperlinks one after another,
  • Citing quotation after quotation,
  • Rewriting our call-to-actions.

Are you doing all of these? If so, hours would pass without you noticing.

I know because that was me.

A silly, time-wasting, relentless boots-polishing online writer.

Of course, you might think what’s wrong? We are beefing up the quality of our work!

Quite possibly, yes.

But you need not spend 2 hours polishing your article until it reflects sunlight.

How to avoid polishing your next article excessively

These are my recommendations.

  • Learn to write shorter sentences,
  • Work towards an end-time,
  • Observe article length.

Allow me to explain.

Writing shorter sentences is [by far], hands down, the best way to slash writing time down across the board. Here’s why.

  • Fewer words, fewer grammatical errors.
  • Also, it is simpler to read.

I stick to these rules of thumb while writing.

  • Commas are like a plague — Avoid them.
  • Periods are visual pit stops — Sprinkle them.
  • Bullets streamline thinking — Construct them.

That is my advice for writing shorter sentences.

From there, we can work towards an end-time in mind. Imagine a shot clock. When time is up, you drop.

You learn to write [a tad] faster. Just a tad. Think 1%.

All the 1% adds up. It will spiral you upwards.

At first, we pause when the time is up. With time, we finish before the alarm rings.

Here, I observe 2 golden rules.

Don’t start clueless.

You end up typing, deleting, lengthening, shortening, elaborating, pruning. Avoid that.

Also, don’t start without a conclusion in mind. You will drift to the writer’s hyperspace.

Last point.

Observing article length.

You might ask, what is that? Easy.

Question.

How many words make up a minute of reading time?

As a guideline,

  • 500 words = 3-minute read.
  • 750 words = 4-minute read.
  • 1,000 words = 5-minute read.

So on and so forth.

Is this relevant to article polishing? Great question.

1st answer.

Article polishing time increases [exponentially] as words increase. I spent more time on Grammarly checking a 5-minute piece than a 4-minute piece.

Next.

You want to find the sweet spot between,

  • Maximum concentration without distraction (a.k.a. flow),
  • The ideal length of your preferred genre,
  • Publication requirements.

Many publications look to the 4-minute read as their ideal length. There is magic in the number 4, I guess.

Also, my best-performing articles fall within the 4-minute bracket. For full disclosure, I write about business, entrepreneurship, sales, money, and retirement.

And~DD~

I can spit 800 words out in one cut.

This is my ultimate sweet spot.

What about yours?

The close

What if, what if, you make the same $0.22 writing…

  • A 4-minute read article?
  • A 5-minute read article?

And what if you spent,

  • 10 minutes polishing the 4-minute read compared to,
  • 17 minutes polishing the 5-minute read?

Would your thinking change?

I hope so.

Less can be more in more ways than one.

Avoid polishing your article like how I shined my boots!

Like this story? Hit Subscribe!

Oh, oh, you can buy me a cup of black too! Thank you!

Writing
Psychology
Life Lessons
Productivity
Economics
Recommended from ReadMedium