An Environmental Keyword For New Nature Writers
How ‘becoming-with’ can shift the emphasis away from anthropocentrism in the environmental stories we tell.

“[i]f we appreciate the foolishness of human exceptionalism then we know that becoming is always becoming with, in a contact zone where the outcome, where who is in the world, is at stake.”
– Donna Haraway
Becoming-with mushrooms, lightning, and hawks
What I find useful about the idea of ‘becoming-with’ is that it nudges us to take inventory of all the ideas about human beings (and being human) inherited from a Western Enlightenment tradition grounded in anthropocentrism, a view which tends to divide humans (culture) from nonhumans (nature).
For example, in an interesting series of blog posts in Engagement (a blog published by the anthropology and environment society), entitled Multi-Species Anthropology: Becoming Human with Others, the editors introduce the series like this:
“The Western notion of “the human” as we know it is unraveling. From fields as diverse as developmental biology, epigenetics, environmental history, science and technology studies, and anthropology, we are learning new ways that the histories and trajectories of humans are bound up with those of other species.”
As a linguist by training, human language is often pointed to as the unique capacity that separates humans from nonhuman animals: language is one key capacity that makes us ‘exceptional,’ separating us from the nonhuman natural world.
But the idea of becoming-with shifts the emphasis on the stories we tell about human-environment relationships away from claims of human exceptionalism, and by extension, human superiority over nature. Instead, it brings focus to the entanglements and mutual co-patternings instead of Western intellectual obsessions with human exceptionalism and anthropocentric viewpoints.
For ecolinguists and environmental communicators, the concept ‘becoming-with’ asks us to tell new stories that move beyond our often unconscious reliance on the dualistic categories ‘humans’ and ‘nature’.¹
But what would such stories look like? And anyway, how would these new stories of ‘becoming-with’ serve us ‘better’ than the stories we already tell as writers and communicators concerned with addressing the ecological crisis?
For me, I need good examples of stories using the environmental keyword ‘becoming-with’, or else philosophical discussions about nature/culture binaries can get very abstract very fast. With this in mind, below are two stories from two anthropologists that use the concept of ‘becoming-with’ in insightful ways. In particular, to tell stories from the perspective of the ‘contact zone’: that space of curiosity (and risk) where human and nonhuman entities, processes, and beings meet.
Becoming-with Matsutake Mushrooms
The Mushroom at the End of the World: in her fascinating study, anthropologist Anna Tsing uses the idea of becoming-with to tell novel stories about the lives of people involved in the Matsutake mushroom industry in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S. (and other places with a Matsutake market, like Japan and Finland). Here’s a passage that stuck with me:
“Species are not always the right units for telling the life of the forest. The term “multispecies” is only a stand-in for moving beyond human exceptionalism. Sometimes individual organisms make drastic interventions. And sometimes much larger units are more able to show us historical action.”
Becoming-with lightning
In her thought-provoking essay, Becoming-with, the environmental philosopher Kate Wright tells the story of two boys who went hiking on Moro Rock in California. At the top of the rock, they noticed their hair was standing on end, and their sister took a picture of them. Seconds later, the two boys were struck by lighting. Both survived but suffered severe burns. Through this story, Wright tells their story as a ‘becoming-lightning-storm’:
“Ultimately, this compelling photograph of two young men laughing in the face of powerful planetary forces is a reminder of how tragic and dangerous the cognitive illusion of human exceptionalism can be. We can never disconnect from Earth’s ecological community, because we are always becoming-with, in a living multispecies world composed of phenomena and transitions. But we can terribly damage our ability to respond to that world.”






