AHA’s Public Blunder: Advocating for a Caring Response from Major Media Outlets to Inform the Public
Here is why the American Heart Association should release a public apology and advise the public to calm down about the dissemination of an immature scientific paper about intermittent fasting increasing heart disease risk 91%

Importance of Sincere Apology
Sincere apologies from individuals or organizations hold immense importance as they acknowledge errors or oversights and demonstrate a commitment to integrity and accountability.
Beyond rectifying mistakes, a sincere apology has the power to heal by restoring trust and confidence in the scientific community. It is a profound gesture of humility and transparency, promoting an environment where open dialogue, learning, and growth can thrive.
Moreover, by publicly acknowledging missteps and offering apologies, people, and organizations set a precedent for ethical conduct and responsible communication, ultimately strengthening the foundation of scientific inquiry and public trust in research findings.
Importance of Cardiovascular Diseases
Cardiovascular disease is widespread globally and in the US. For example, according to the CDC, “One person dies every 33 seconds in the United States from cardiovascular disease. Every year, about 805,000 people in the United States have a heart attack.”
I documented my perspectives in a previous story, as heart disease is close to my heart. My father passed away due to a heart attack at a much younger age than I am now.
Here is why I wrote this short yet important piece.
As a retired public health scientist, I feel compelled to address the recent controversy surrounding the American Heart Association’s dissemination of a non-peer-reviewed manuscript regarding intermittent fasting and its alleged link to increased heart disease risk. This issue strikes at the core of public health communication and responsible dissemination of scientific findings.
The article titled Perfect Storm in a Teacup: Can Intermittent Fasting Increase Heart Disease Risk 91%? authored by Dr Mehmet Yildiz sheds light on the dissemination of preliminary research findings by the AHA, which subsequently sparked widespread concern among the public due to immature and misinformation.
While the initial intention may have been to inform the public, the manner in which the findings were presented needed to have the necessary context and caution required when discussing such sensitive topics.
It is evident from Dr. Yildiz’s comprehensive analysis that the research findings were preliminary and subject to various limitations, including the lack of peer review and the potential for misinterpretation.
Despite the lead researcher’s explicit warnings about their unpublished paper regarding the preliminary nature of the findings, media outlets sensationalized the information, causing unnecessary panic and confusion among the public.
Conclusions
As a society, we must recognize the importance of responsible science communication and the ethical dissemination of research findings. While it is essential to inform the public about potential health risks, it must be done in a manner that is transparent, accurate, and free from sensationalism.
In light of these events, I and my scientist colleagues urge the American Heart Association to issue a public apology through major media outlets, acknowledging the oversight and clarifying the context surrounding the research findings.
By taking accountability for the misinformation disseminated, the American Heart Association can demonstrate its commitment to upholding scientific integrity and protecting public health.
Organizations like the AHA must prioritize transparency, accuracy, and responsibility when communicating scientific findings to the public. By doing so, we can ensure that individuals have the information they need to make informed decisions about their health and well-being.
For further information on this issue, you may check out this caring message posted by Dr Ken Berry on YouTube.






