A FILM TO REMEMBER: “VERTIGO” (1958)

Before I get into this, I want to make mention “A FILM TO REMEMBER” will be a series about films that have reached a milestone anniversary since their origin in being culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant. The articles will contain the film’s plot outline, director, cast, a compilation of trivialities, various photos, movie trailer, critical reception and more. So, let’s start:
We are here to mark the celebration of the 60th Anniversary of Alfred Hitchcock’s “Vertigo”. Let’s take an inside look at the film:
PLOT OUTLINE:
A former police detective juggles wrestling with his personal demons and becoming obsessed with a hauntingly beautiful woman.

STUDIO:
Universal Pictures
DIRECTOR:
Alfred Hitchcock
CAST:
- James Stewart … John “Scottie” Ferguson
- Kim Novak … Judy Barton/Madeleine Elster
- Barbara Bel Geddes … Marjorie “Midge” Wood
- Tom Helmore … Gavin Elster
- Henry Jones … Coroner
- Raymond Bailey … Scottie’s Doctor
- Ellen Corby … Manager of McKittrick Hotel
- Konstantin Shayne … Pop Leibel
- Lee Patrick … Car Owner Mistaken for Madeleine
- Margaret Brayton … Ransohoff’s Saleslady (uncredited)
- Paul Bryar … Capt. Hansen (uncredited)
- Fred Graham … Policeman on Rooftop (uncredited)
- Sara Taft … Nun (uncredited)
GENRE(S):
Mystery | Romance | Thriller
TAGLINE:
The most intense SUSPENSE…..EXCITEMENT….EMOTION ever generated by a motion picture!

The film is know for being often cited as director Alfred Hitchcock’s masterpiece and one of the defining works of his career in this spellbinding study of a rich, resonant meditation of male romantic obsession, fear and control of women through an alluringly acrophobic performance by James Stewart in making this as one of the most highly renowned classics. The film is based from Boileau-Narcejac’s novel “D’entre les morts” (from “Among the Dead”), it received a mixed reception initially, attracting significant scholarly criticism, common to all of these critical views though is a lack of sympathy with the basic structure and drive of the film in this mastery of suspense but it has widely been reappraised over the course of time as being consensually, acclaimed as one of the best films of all-time in the annals of cinema.
Here’s what some of the critical receptions have been for the film over the years:
David Ansen from Newsweek says: “Why is this movie Hitchcock’s masterpiece? Because no movie plunges us more deeply into the dizzying heart of erotic obsession.”
Mike Clark from USA Today says: “You watch this guy going slowly over the brink and realize, good grief, this is Jimmy Stewart.”
Bosley Crowther from New York Times says: “There! No more hints! Coming or not? What more’s to say? Well, nothing, except that ‘Vertigo’ is performed in the manner expected of all performers in Hitchcock films.”
TIME Magazine Staff from TIME Magazine says: “The old master, now a slave to television, has turned out another Hitchcock-and-bull story in which the mystery is not so much who done it as who cares.”
Peter Stack from San Francisco Chronicle says: “In its dark heart, the film is a sorrowful contemplation of love and the veils that manipulate sexual passions.”

As you can tell by the critical reactions, the film has garnered mixed results with negatives being that its far-fetched, too long, slow and bog down to certain respects. While others, more positively have claimed Hitchcock’s mastery as an artistic triumph, using his Hitchcockian hallmarks all mesmerizingly on view that dives deeply into the dizzying nucleus of erotic obsession and the brash flair for psychological shocks of the lure of death, the power of the past, the near-fetishistic use of symbol and color and the guilty complicity of a clean-cut hero performed steadfastly by Stewart in this slick, mysterious, dream-like, film-noir cognitive neurosis tour de force. But I’ll let you decide…
So, to get a better look at the film, here’s a link to the movie trailer of Alfred Hitchcock’s “Vertigo”:


