avatarRichie Crowley

Summary

The author emphasizes the importance of engaging with comments on Medium to foster honest discourse and accountability among writers.

Abstract

The article discusses the significance of replying to every comment on Medium, a platform where words are the primary form of communication. The author argues that engaging in dialogue with readers is crucial for several reasons: it encourages authors to provide evidence for their claims, prevents the spread of misinformation, and upholds the integrity of the writing community. The author expresses frustration over an encounter with an article that lacked substantiation and highlights the need for writers to defend their opinions, especially controversial ones. The piece also touches on Medium's Terms of Use, which hold authors accountable for the content they publish. The author advocates for respectful debate and responsible use of the platform, suggesting that by engaging with comments, writers honor their words and the community's trust.

Opinions

  • Medium should not become a platform for unsubstantiated claims or deceptive writing.
  • Writers have a responsibility to back up their assertions with evidence.
  • Engaging with comments is a way to express gratitude to readers and to enter into a constructive dialogue.
  • The author believes that Medium's community should hold each other accountable for the content they publish.
  • Writers should be prepared to defend their controversial statements and engage in respectful debate.
  • The author values the integrity of words and the importance of honest communication on the platform.
  • The article suggests that writers should not only reply to comments to engage in debate but also as a sign of respect for their audience.

Why You Should Reply To Every Comment

One of the most honorable things we have is our word.

Photo by Mike Meyers on Unsplash

Medium is a platform dominated by words. Each time we click publish we invite feedback, support, criticism, and debate. It’s a beautiful arena for respectful exchanges.

But what Medium does not have is any sort of regulation that requires authors to provide evidence for their claims. Or, as Alexis Madrigal of The Atlantic wrote, “Medium doesn’t appear to have any ethical constraints.” Dangerous.

Recently, I read a piece titled I’m Not Updating My job On Linkedin by an author with a suspicious 60,000 followers. I’m not going to link the piece because by simply reading the piece in full you’d be rewarding the writing, and I’d be complicit in the rewarding of writing I strongly oppose.

Call me petty.

After reading this article, I was so upset (maybe I should have meditated more) by the careless and suggested deception that I left a comment. Not just any comment, but a brilliant, thoughtful, passionate response.

It was also feisty. Still, I stand by it.

Now, there is absolutely zero expectation of engagement whenever I do leave comments, but I wanted one. I felt I had written a compelling enough response that I deserved one. I thought I deserved one, emotions aside, at least as an opportunity for the author to support his claims or defend his actions.

You see, on Medium, I often see writers share opinions as if they were facts, an attempt to create truth, or writers sharing facts without linking the source, the study, or science. I know Medium isn’t journalism, but I do believe we are a respected group of writers that should not attempt to deceive each other and should provide evidence when making audacious or even simple claims. (See how I linked The Atlantic article? Simple.)

Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Youtube have cracked and allowed lies and misinformation to seep in, spread, and be interpreted as truth. I don’t want to see this on Medium.

So that’s why I call writers out in their comments and welcome it the same on my writing. We are responsible for the content we post, and as Medium’s Terms of Use say:

“This means you assume all risks related to it, including someone else’s reliance on its accuracy, or claims relating to intellectual property or other legal rights.”

When reading this, I believe we must expand our interpretation and as a collective hold each other accountable. If you want to write something controversial, write the hell out of it, but be prepared to defend it. Medium has created this brilliant arena for us to have respectful debate, and I hold on to the idea that we will honor that.

So that is why I’ll call bullshit when I see it and expect it as well. My responses and my writings have no ego, they are complete invites to engage or as my bio says, to feel, something.

We shouldn’t reply to comments just because Gary Vee tells us too.

We should reply because it is an opportunity to express gratitude to those who admire our words.

We should reply to defend or support a claim we’ve made.

We should reply to honor our words.

Richie. Human.

On the topic of sacred words, a little while back I wrote about why I don’t say two phrases: I’m Sorry and I’m Proud Of You. I think you’ll enjoy this quick read, and maybe even put this into practice. Let me know your thoughts!

The difference between Seth Godin, The Morning Brew, and me? I respect your inbox, curating only one newsletter per month — Join my behind-the-words monthly newsletter to feel what it’s like to receive a respectful newsletter.

And, for those interested in what else I’m building, come over to RICKiRICKi.

Meet me 🤠 • LinkedInInstagramTwitterTikTokFacebookYouTube

Medium
Writing
Journalism
Integrity
Lies
Recommended from ReadMedium