avatarPaul Abela, MSc

Summary

The Jerry Springer Show is criticized for exploiting vulnerable individuals for profit and entertainment, reflecting a societal value system that prioritizes financial gain over human compassion and dignity.

Abstract

The Jerry Springer Show, which ran for 27 years and aired 4000 episodes before its conclusion in 2018, has been scrutinized for its sensationalist approach to entertainment that capitalized on the personal traumas of its guests. The show's format, which encouraged public ridicule and staged confrontations, is seen as a stark representation of a culture that values profit over the well-being of individuals. Despite its popularity, the program is condemned for exacerbating the problems of its participants and setting a precedent that encourages the exploitation of human suffering for financial gain. Critics argue that the show's enduring success and the lack of empathy from its audience are indicative of a society that has lost its moral compass, prioritizing entertainment and money over genuine human connection and support.

Opinions

  • The show is likened to a "freakshow" that profited from the misfortunes of others, with guests being treated as mere entertainment rather than individuals in need of help.
  • The audience's thirst for sensationalism and violence is seen as a disturbing reflection of societal values that are devoid of empathy and compassion.
  • The show's producers and the broader television industry are criticized for prioritizing ratings and revenue over the mental and emotional well-being of the show's participants.
  • The continued popularity of the show suggests a societal indifference to the exploitation of vulnerable people, as long as it translates into profit.
  • The lack of support or aftercare for participants post-show highlights a disregard for the lasting impact on individuals who were used for entertainment.
  • The existence and potential revival of the show are viewed as symptoms of a culture that is "rotten to the core," with a foundation built on profit rather than people.
  • The show's legacy is seen as a negative commentary on society's willingness to commodify human suffering and the detrimental effects this has on collective empathy and social responsibility.

Why The Jerry Springer Show is a Symbol of a Rotten Society

Profit comes before people, every time

Photo by Melanie Lauze on flickr

After 27 years and 4000 shows, the Jerry Springer Show came to an end in 2018. The end didn’t come due to outrage at a show that took advantage of vulnerable members of society, oh no. The decision was made due to cold hard numbers; people weren’t tuning in any longer. It’s scary to imagine that if ratings had remained high, the circus would be on air. The show is a symbol of culture and society that places profit above people. A culture that has lost focus on what the aim of the game (should) be — make society a better place for everyone.

At its peak in the 1990s, the show was one of the most popular daytime programs in the US.

The show, for want of a better word, was a freakshow. The guests, who are the victims, came to the show with genuine problems. But they were thrown into the pen, the stage where the audience and those at home got a thrill from laughing at the victim's problems. These people came to the show because they had problems. You imagine these problems were causing emotional anguish. And what did the show do? Made a mockery of them.

With the Jerry Springer Show, it seems the more public outrage it could cause, the better. The more outrageous the story, the more it boosted ratings. More ratings equal more money; everyone’s a winner, apart from those victims, of course — but who cares about them, right?

The whole time the crowd was baying for blood. They were there to be entertained; they came to see violence. And more often than not, the victims gave them what they wanted.

Everything was set up for that moment. The crescendo as Jerry directs the conversation towards the ‘bombshell’. Cue the inevitable staged brawl as the bodyguards quickly waltzed in to remove the chairs, giving the victims more space to fight.

As soon as the fight erupted, the crowd rose, chanting “Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!” in unison. They sang praise to the ringmaster, offering thanks to the man who made the entertainment possible.

As soon as the fight ended, the show was done with the victims. They were ushered off and shuffled out of the back door. One set of victims falls off the conveyor belt while a steady stream of victims waited in the wings.

A mirror on society

It’s hard to comprehend why there were so many victims eager to go onto the show. You suspect they wanted their moment in the limelight. For others, you suspect they wanted to deal with their problems and believed the show could help them do so.

But there is no entertainment value in helping people. The show seemed to get a measure of joy out of making their problems worse.

While it’s all fun and games for the crowd when the people walk off the set, their problems have become a whole lot worse.

How could no one empathize with the people on the show, who, like a conveyor belt, were brought in through one door and chucked out of the other? What support was offered? What effort was made to help people through their genuine problems? None. Because the people on the show didn’t matter.

The only thing people cared about was that the story was outrageous enough to create a shock factor. All they cared about is that they fought. In short, they didn’t care about the people on the show or their feelings; they cared if the story made for good ratings.

Feeding off victims

What’s almost incomprehensible is that 4000 episodes were created. Thousands of victims. How was the show allowed to continue for so long without being banned?

The reason is simple; its popularity made lots of money. What does the show's popularity say about society if it was so popular for so long?

It represents a society that is rotten to the core and devoid of a moral base—one where profits come before anything else.

Where was the compassion for people? Where was the sense of sincerity? These are human beings with emotions. And they were welcomed onto a stage which is uncannily like a zoo, designed for people to gawk at the victims as if they were animals.

It was (and still is) uncomfortable and heartbreaking to watch. But that's only if you have any empathy for other people; if you’re blinded by money and profit, who cares about the impacts on the victims.

All about the money

The show is an extreme symbol that in society, money comes before people; every single time.

The Jerry Springer Show was a stark symbol of that fact. What makes it all the more amazing is that the producers haven’t put the show to bed entirely. This grotesque freakshow may come back onto our screens.

If we lived in a society that placed compassion and empathy at its foundation, the show would never have existed in the first place.

If we want to create a better world, where people come before profit, a show that uses people for entertainment would never air. No good comes from the show other than to abuse the victims and desensitize people to the plight of others.

These are human beings. No one should be treated like this. But so long as money is prioritized over people, they will be. All that matters is the golden question — can I make money out of it? If the answer is yes, go right ahead, the impact on society is irrelevant because in our society the bottom line is money. The victims don’t matter, hidden away, quietly dealing with the terrible repercussions of those who gain from taking advantage of them.

The Jerry Springer Show
Circus
Inequality
Victims
Rotten Society
Recommended from ReadMedium