avatarRafay Hiraj

Summary

The article discusses the psychological reasons behind the compulsion to correct others and the desire to win every argument, despite the triviality of the subject matter, such as the location of a cup.

Abstract

The article delves into the common human tendency to spot errors and engage in arguments relentlessly, even over insignificant details. The author reflects on personal experiences, such as being called a "Grammar Nazi" and engaging in a 20-minute debate about a misplaced cup, to illustrate how this behavior is often about seeking attention and cheap gratification rather than genuine discourse. The piece suggests that such behavior may be driven by a need for validation and the mistaken belief that time spent arguing equates to wealth in the form of attention. The author humorously advises holding back on the need to correct others and emphasizes the value of listening over speaking, advocating for delayed gratification instead of immediate but fleeting victories. The article concludes by encouraging readers to discern which arguments are worth engaging in, rather than succumbing to the reflex to win at all costs.

Opinions

  • The need to correct others and win arguments is linked to an underlying desire for attention and validation.
  • People often engage in arguments to experience a sense of triumph, even if the topic is inconsequential.
  • The author self-identifies as a frequent participant in arguments but acknowledges the futility and time-wasting nature of such behavior.
  • The article promotes the idea that maintaining silence and listening can be more valuable than constant speech and correction.
  • The piece humorously comments on how arguments can escalate to personal attacks rather than remaining focused on the original issue.
  • The author suggests that some arguments are genuinely beneficial, but many are not worth the effort, and discerning between the two is important.
  • The article encourages the practice of delayed gratification and suggests that not all errors require correction.
  • The author implies that the gratification from "winning" trivial arguments is cheap and not worth the potential damage to relationships and self-image.
  • The piece concludes with a call to subscribe and follow for more insights, indicating the writer's interest in continuing to engage with the audience on such topics.

Why Do We Feel The Need to Spot Every Error and Win Every Argument?

A friend called me a Grammar Nazi because I corrected him so much…

Photo by Houcine Ncib on Unsplash

I spent 20 minutes talking to a friend about how he was wrong about where he put the cup when none of us could find it.

20 minutes following finding the cup, we talked about who was lying and who was right.

Unsurprisingly, it was followed by feelings of regret, wasting time on something so nimble. But the truth is, it happens almost every day in our lives.

Pointing the finger at someone and blatantly saying, “You are wrong!” is something we all have done.

So I got to thinking, why are we so obsessive over winning, even if it is something so insignificant and meaningless?

Keep your magnifying glass in your own pocket

If you are like me, you also show up in arguments unneeded.

Personally, I’d give you the pass if you were Sherlock Holmes but odds tell me there is a 0% chance that is the case.

Yes, everyone has their genius moments, but let’s be honest, none of us has an IQ of 190 and a fat-sized ego that deserves to go with it.

If you had a 190 IQ, I would gladly give you a pass.

Don’t get me wrong I love Sherlock Holmes.

Nonetheless, sometimes it is better to keep your magnifying glass in your own pocket.

It becomes annoying if you drop in every argument.

Not every broken line needs fixing — there is no need to examine every statement with a slaving need to find errors just so you have something to say!

“You just want attention”

Charlie Puth got it right, we do just want attention.

The most useless arguments will have to draw an eventual winner, why? So we can bask in the glory of the 4 seconds we get in the spotlight.

This is cheap gratification or cheap attention, no doubt about that.

Words are sugarcoated and statements are toned in a way to elicit a response. When the response doesn’t come, you’ve won.

The other person might not talk to you, but who cares when you can do your best impression of a Tyson Fury walkout.

Like a wise man once said, “Grab free stuff whenever you can” we tend to jump in every error — correct it, and get our free attention whenever we can!

Look in the mirror to see a billionaire

Another reason is, if time is money, chances are you are a billionaire. You might just have a lot.

When I have nothing to do, I think, why not correct someone. At least someone will feel my presence in their day.

(It’s sad isn’t it LOL)

Shut that trap every once in a while

I feel like one thing I am not is a talker.

I don’t like it for some reason, to be honest. It is also, for this reason, I will try to get everyone to become a listener.

Insanity is not insane if everyone is doing it.

Anyway, I feel like people who talk a lot, love, to jump in to find errors.

Before I tell everyone to do their laundry, let me show you my dirty clothes as well.

I was called a Grammar Nazi once because I corrected a friend every time he said something wrong. At a point, he went, “Please shut up!” in a nice way.

If you love to talk, you will continue to do so regardless of whether or not you have something meaningful to say.

It is better to listen every once in a while. I now listen way more than I talk. It just feels easier.

Another exercise I tend to do is hold onto a point even when I know it can win me the argument or prove the other person wrong just to see how long I can go without it.

As an old saying goes, “There is a reason you have two ears and one mouth.”

Listen more than you speak and you will have so much more to say

One of life’s great ironies.

The universal law seems to be, delay gratification to seek the ultimate one.

Turns out we revolve around irony; not the Sun.

The cavalry has arrived!

If an argument does not conclude in the first 10 minutes, chances are everyone is now screaming at the other.

It is not an argument anymore but rather a barrage of personal attacks.

It fascinates me when this happens. I have seen it so many times. You can virtually see the line being crossed, but, who cares? You have to win now that you have come so far.

F*ck winning the argument, you just want to leave the room happier of the two! LOL.

See, everyone is a winner until the real winner arrives. The ‘throw petrol on the fire’ one.

I mean come on, who doesn’t like watching two people screaming at each other over something that has nothing to do about them.

At a point, I might as well make some popcorn.

Sadly, I am one of the two crazies screaming.

At this point, it is just screaming. The person who stops screaming loses. But I guess you have to learn to take the loss then.

Trust me, it is worth it. Save your sanity.

Spending 3 days with me will tell you it is, don’t let me fool you though, it isn’t.

Takeaway

Delaying gratification is always better than cheap gratification — always.

Arguments and errors happen often but you don’t HAVE to win them or correct them just because you can.

Not only is it rude, it is pretty sad too considering we are willing to do so much just to prove a point. This coming from someone who probably has a Ph.D. in it.

While some arguments are genuinely beneficial, most are useless. It comes in handy being able to separate the two and ignore the ones that deserve to be ignored.

LIKE TALKING ABOUT A CUP FOR 20 MINUTES!!

If you enjoyed reading this, consider following and subscribing by email. That way you will get an email every time I publish.

Subscribe to Medium to get access to thousands of amazing articles from all writers on the platform here!

Stories featured in this article (in order);

Self Improvement
Relationships
Arguments
Illumination
Life Lessons
Recommended from ReadMedium