avatarLawson Wallace

Summary

The author discusses the presence of toxicity on Medium, advocating for civil discourse and constructive expression of disagreement over anger and hatred.

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of hostility on Medium, where the author observes that while disagreement is inevitable and healthy, the expression of anger and hatred in the comments is not. The author, who is also an editor and avid reader on the platform, emphasizes that differing opinions can be channeled productively into writing rather than resorting to insults. The piece suggests that righteous anger, when directed appropriately, can lead to meaningful discussions and potentially change minds, whereas name-calling and trolling do not contribute to productive dialogue. The author encourages readers to use Medium as a platform for reasoned debate and to avoid toxic behavior that could undermine the quality of the platform.

Opinions

  • The author acknowledges that disagreement is a natural part of discourse and can be beneficial when it encourages thinking.
  • There is a clear distinction made between civil disagreement and the expression of anger or hatred, which the author finds unnecessary and counterproductive.
  • The author believes that it is possible to disagree without resorting to insults or personal attacks.
  • Instead of engaging in toxic behavior, the author suggests using negative emotions such as anger as motivation to write thoughtful responses or articles.
  • The author values Medium as a platform for intellectual exchange and warns against the detrimental effects of toxicity on the community.
  • Constructive engagement and reasonable discussions are seen as more effective in changing views compared to hostile interactions.
  • The author encourages the audience to maintain the positive environment on Medium by expressing anger in a way that can lead to positive outcomes.

Why do some people want to Make Medium a toxic Environment?

Being civil might change minds, but anger never does

Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko from Pexels

I was sitting at my desk reading articles on Medium, I checked the comments for my stories and chuckled. The haters were out in full force. I don’t expect that people will always agree with me I’m glad people disagree, it shows they are thinking.

It’s possible to disagree without hatred

What I don’t understand though, is the anger and outright hatred. We all come from different backgrounds and worldviews. We will never agree on everything. I know some folks will disagree, but it’s possible to disagree without insults and name-calling.

I read hundreds of articles a week, and I’m an Editor for publications as well. I read many articles where I disagree with the writers. I never leave nasty comments, or call writers names.

Use it for fuel to write articles

I make notes and I write an article in response. I write the article based on reason and my personal opinion. In this way, I have a steady supply of article ideas and I don’t have to hurt anyone’s feelings or incite trolls.

Righteous anger is a good thing if it’s channeled in the right way. If you want to get your point across, and if you want to change someone’s views on a subject. A reasonable discussion will get better results than name-calling.

Final Thought:

So, be angry if you need to. Channel that anger and express it in a way that will do some good and leave the hate on the nightly news. Medium is the best platform on the Internet. Don’t mess up a good thing.

Medium
Anger
Angry
Read Medium Articles
Opinion
Recommended from ReadMedium