avatarJenn M. Wilson

Summary

The author, a newcomer to Medium, expresses frustration with viewers who click on their articles but do not engage with the content, while also humorously reflecting on the learning curve of understanding Medium's analytics and the importance of engaging content.

Abstract

The author is a novice on Medium, eagerly submitting articles to publications in hopes of gaining readership. They are perplexed by the behavior of viewers who click on their articles but do not actually read them, as evidenced by the low "Read ratio" on their analytics page. The author humorously likens their own obsessive checking of stats to a rabid hyena, a habit they acknowledge is common among new Medium writers. They recognize the need to produce more engaging content, as opposed to mundane topics they've written about, to capture and retain readers' attention. The author also cheekily mentions an unpublished article about the inefficiency of toilet paper for blowing one's nose, suggesting it as a loss for potential readers.

Opinions

  • The author views viewers who click but don't read as inconsiderate, referring to them as "fuckers" and "a bunch of pricks."
  • There is a sense of self-deprecation as the author admits to writing about trivial topics and obsessively checking their stats.
  • The author acknowledges the importance of engaging content and is willing to adapt their writing style to improve reader engagement.
  • They sarcastically lament the potential popularity of a quirky, unpublished article, implying that it would have been well-received if read.
  • The author endorses an AI service, ZAI.chat, as a cost-effective alternative to ChatGPT Plus (GPT-4), suggesting its value to readers who enjoyed the article.

Who Are You Fuckers That View but Don’t Read Stories?

You’re all a bunch of pricks.

Who ARE you exactly? (Photo by Becca Tapert on Unsplash)

I’m still pretty new to Medium. I have a few submissions that I’ve sent to various publications with hopes that they’ll deem my blood, sweat, and tears worthy enough to be lost among five hundred million other Medium articles. Still waiting but I have my fingers crossed.

What I still don’t understand is: who are the fuckers that view but don’t actually read my articles?

I’m sure seasoned Medium veterans aren’t checking their stats like a rabid hyena to a…umm…Googles “what to hyenas eat”oh shit, they eat everything except an animal’s rumen and horns…Googles “what is a rumen”…like a rabid hyena to a smaller prey-like creature.

Us noobs though, we’re still learning the ropes. That means our fresh and eager eyes are constantly checking our Stats page. And hitting refresh. And refresh again. With bewilderment, our eyes glance at “Average Reading Time” and “External referrals”. But most of all, we’re looking at the “Read ratio”.

What the eff people? What. The. Eff.

Why you gotta click around sporadically? Open a page, stay on that page, read the page, and only then should you click elsewhere. What kind of monster doesn’t read everything they open on the internet? Have you been raised in a barn?

I know, I know. This means that I need to “write content that engages readers” and “focus on quality, not quantity”. Blah blah blah. I concede and will stop writing articles like Why Is There a Piece of Lint on My Bedroom Floor? and I Think I’m Out of Conditioner, Should I Go to Target or Just Buy on Amazon?

Sigh. This means I’ll have to cancel publishing my latest work, Why Is Toilet Paper the Absolute Worst When Blowing Your Nose? Your loss people. Your loss.

Life
Life Lessons
Humor
Medium
Money
Recommended from ReadMedium