Summary

The article argues that cancel culture, while often perceived as negative, serves as a necessary counterbalance to unchecked free speech, particularly in the context of social media and heightened liberalism, and suggests that a balance between the two is essential for societal discourse.

Abstract

The author of the article reflects on the concept of cancel culture, asserting that it is not a standalone phenomenon but rather a product of social media and liberal ideology. The article uses the example of Whoopi Goldberg's suspension from The View to illustrate the complexities of public discourse and the consequences of speaking out. The author posits that cancel culture, when paired with employer actions, can lead to a "counsel culture" where individuals are encouraged to learn from their mistakes. The piece emphasizes the importance of balance between conservative notions of free speech and the corrective aspects of cancel culture, arguing that both are necessary to navigate the nuances of human nature and public dialogue in America. The author concludes by advocating for personal growth, active listening, and accountability as key takeaways from the interplay between free speech and cancel culture.

Opinions

Cancel culture is seen as a response to the misuse of free speech, particularly by those who spread racist, sexist, or homophobic language.
The author believes that cancel culture is not inherently real unless it involves tangible consequences, such as employment suspension.
Social media is identified as a facilitator of cancel culture, giving a platform for people to express their dissatisfaction with public figures' statements or actions.
The article suggests that cancel culture can be a positive force when it leads to constructive dialogue and personal development, rather than mere punishment.
A balanced approach to free speech and cancel culture is advocated, where individuals can speak their minds but also face consequences and learn from them.
The author criticizes the over-sensitivity of some liberals who use cancel culture as a scare tactic, while also critiquing conservatives who hide behind free speech to avoid accountability.
The author's stance is that people should be allowed to be ignorant, provided they are open to learning why their statements were wrong.
The piece rejects the idea of an idealistic unity in favor of recognizing the roles of both cancel culture and free speech in shaping public discourse.
The author encourages individuals to learn from their mistakes, listen to others, and avoid being closed-minded.

We Need Cancel Culture — Even Though It’s Not Real

Cancel culture creates counsel culture if paired with something else

Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash

Someone made an amazing quote on my hotel TV yesterday that rattled my spirit:

“We need counsel culture — not cancel culture.”

This made me think about the whole Whoopie Goldberg situation. If you didn’t know, Whoopie Goldberg was under fire a few weeks ago for saying on The View that the Holocaust “wasn’t about race.”

I don’t think Whoopie was wrong for saying that statement given the fact that our American perception of what race is has changed over the years.

But she was suspended from The View for 2 weeks and tons of people came at her neck online.

Here’s the thing.

Social meda+Heightened liberalism=Cancel culture

There’s no way around that.

Cancel culture isn’t a real thing — unless the people who do the “canceling” are the employers.

It’s the facade of social media that binds us to the bullshit. Cancel culture is just something the over-sensitive liberals use to scare people from speaking their minds.

Even though I disagree with what happened to Whoopie, I wouldn’t say that cancel culture is the bain of everyone’s existence.

When you think about it, cancel culture is the perfect counteraction to this “free speech” bullshit that conservatives use as a tactic to spread their racist, sexist, homophobic language everywhere without getting consequences.

However, having too much of one or the other is a recipe for disaster.

You know I’m a balance fanatic.

It’s great to have the push and pull of conservative “free speech” versus cancel culture. Those two elements teach us something crucial about human nature, especially in America:

You can’t say whatever you want and not expect consequences. But it’s okay for you to be ignorant as long as you genuinely want to learn why something you said was wrong.

Two things can exist at the same time.

I don’t want this piece to come off as a we-should-all-get-together-and-sing-kumbaya-and-do-the-rain-dance type piece because that’s corny and disingenuous.

But we need to understand the role cancel culture plays and the role “free speech” plays in the public reception of political issues.

No matter what side you’re on or what you say, one of these counteracting forces will always come for your neck.

The best thing we can do as humans is to learn from our mistakes, listen, and not be ignorant dickheads.

That’s all.

Get my free writing guide that can teach you how to build a writing habit in 90 days or less here.