avatarMikhail Portnov

Summary

This context discusses the five isolation levels defined by the ANSI SQL standard: Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read, Serializable, and Snapshot, and their impact on database transactions.

Abstract

The context provides an in-depth explanation of the five isolation levels defined by the ANSI SQL standard: Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read, Serializable, and Snapshot. Each isolation level has its own locking behavior, which affects how transactions interact with one another. The article also discusses the phenomena of phantom, dirty read, and nonrepeatable read in database transactions and how they can impact the consistency and accuracy of the data. The choice of isolation level depends on the specific requirements of the application, and understanding the trade-offs between these isolation levels is critical to building scalable and reliable database applications.

Bullet points

  • The five isolation levels defined by the ANSI SQL standard are: Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read, Serializable, and Snapshot.
  • Each isolation level has its own locking behavior, which affects how transactions interact with one another.
  • Read Uncommitted provides the highest level of concurrency but can result in non-repeatable reads and phantom reads.
  • Read Committed provides a balance between concurrency and consistency but can still result in non-repeatable reads and phantom reads.
  • Repeatable Read provides a high level of consistency but can still result in phantom reads.
  • Serializable provides the highest level of consistency but can impact performance due to the need to acquire locks on entire tables.
  • Snapshot provides the highest level of consistency and accuracy but can impact performance due to the need to maintain multiple snapshots.
  • Phantom, dirty read, and nonrepeatable read are phenomena that can occur in database transactions and can impact the consistency and accuracy of the data.
  • Choosing the appropriate isolation level for a given application can help minimize the occurrence of these phenomena.
  • Understanding the trade-offs between these isolation levels is critical to building scalable and reliable database applications.

Understanding Database Isolation Levels: Balancing Concurrency and Consistency

Introduction

In the world of database transactions, there are several levels of isolation that can be used to control how transactions interact with one another. These levels are designed to balance the need for concurrency and performance with the need for consistency and accuracy. In this article, we will discuss the five isolation levels defined by the ANSI SQL standard: Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read, Serializable, and Snapshot.

Overview of the Five Isolation Levels:

1. Read Uncommitted: In this isolation level, transactions are not required to lock rows before reading or writing data. This means that a transaction can read data that has been modified by another uncommitted transaction. This can lead to non-repeatable reads and phantom reads. However, it provides the highest level of concurrency and can be useful in certain situations.

  • Example: Transaction A is updating a row in Table X, and Transaction B reads the same row before Transaction A commits the change. Transaction B can see the uncommitted data from Transaction A.
  • Locking behavior: No lock at all. Transactions can read uncommitted data from other transactions.

2. Read Committed: In this isolation level, transactions must wait for a row to be committed before reading it. This ensures that transactions do not read data that is in the process of being changed by another transaction. However, this can still result in non-repeatable reads and phantom reads.

  • Example: Transaction A updates a row in Table X, and Transaction B attempts to read the same row before Transaction A commits the change. Transaction B must wait for the row to be committed before reading it.
  • Locking behavior: Simple lock. Transactions can only read committed data from other transactions.

3. Repeatable Read: In this isolation level, transactions must acquire locks on all rows that they read or write. This ensures that other transactions cannot modify or delete the rows while the transaction is in progress. However, this can still result in phantom reads.

  • Example: Transaction A selects all rows from Table X, and Transaction B updates one of the rows in Table X. Transaction B must wait for Transaction A to release its lock on the entire table before making the update.
  • Locking behavior: Rows-level lock. Transactions acquire locks on all rows they read or write.

4. Serializable: In this isolation level, transactions must acquire locks on entire tables before reading or writing data. This ensures that other transactions cannot modify or delete any data in the table while the transaction is in progress. However, this can lead to a high level of contention and can impact performance.

  • Example: Transaction A selects all rows from Table X, and Transaction B attempts to insert a new row into Table X. Transaction B must wait for Transaction A to release its lock on the entire table before making the insert.
  • Locking behavior: Table-level lock. Transactions acquire locks on entire tables.

5. Snapshot: In this isolation level, each transaction has its own snapshot of the database. This means that a transaction can read data without acquiring locks, and other transactions can modify data without impacting the current transaction. This provides the highest level of consistency and accuracy but can impact performance due to the need to maintain multiple snapshots.

  • Example: Transaction A selects all rows from Table X, and Transaction B inserts a new row into Table X. Both transactions see different snapshots of the table and can operate independently.
  • Locking behavior: No lock at all. Each transaction operates on its own snapshot of the database.

Summary of locking behavior

  • Read Uncommitted: No lock at all
  • Read Committed: Simple lock
  • Repeatable Read: Rows-level lock
  • Serializable: Table-level lock
  • Snapshot: No lock at all (each transaction operates on its own snapshot)

Understanding Phantom, Dirty Read, and Nonrepeatable Read in Database Transactions

Phantom, Dirty, and Nonrepeatable reads are phenomena that can occur in database transactions. In a multi-user database environment, it is possible for two or more transactions to access the same data simultaneously. This can cause inconsistency in the data, which can be problematic for applications that rely on the accuracy and consistency of the data.

A phantom read occurs when a transaction retrieves a set of rows based on a given query, and a concurrent transaction inserts or deletes rows that meet the query criteria, causing the first transaction to retrieve a different set of rows when it re-executes the same query. This can occur in any isolation level other than snapshot isolation.

  • Transaction 1: SELECT * FROM TableX WHERE col1 > 10;
  • Transaction 2: INSERT INTO TableX (col1, col2) VALUES (11, 'value1');
  • Transaction 1: SELECT * FROM TableX WHERE col1 > 10;

In this example, Transaction 1 retrieves a set of rows from TableX where col1 is greater than 10. While Transaction 1 is still running, Transaction 2 inserts a new row into TableX with col1 value of 11. When Transaction 1 re-executes the same query, it retrieves the newly inserted row, even though it did not exist when the query was first executed. This is a phantom read.

A dirty read occurs when a transaction reads data that has been modified by another transaction that has not yet committed the change. If the second transaction rolls back the change, the first transaction will have read data that was never actually committed. This can occur in the read uncommitted isolation level.

  • Transaction 1: BEGIN TRANSACTION; SELECT * FROM TableX WHERE col1 = 10;
  • Transaction 2: BEGIN TRANSACTION; UPDATE TableX SET col2 = 'new_value' WHERE col1 = 10;
  • Transaction 2: ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
  • Transaction 1: SELECT * FROM TableX WHERE col1 = 10;

In this example, Transaction 1 begins a transaction and reads data from TableX where col1 is equal to 10. While Transaction 1 is still running, Transaction 2 begins a transaction, updates the same row with a new value for col2, but then rolls back the transaction. When Transaction 1 reads the same row again, it reads the modified value for col2, even though the change was never committed to the database. This is a dirty read.

A nonrepeatable read occurs when a transaction retrieves a row, and a concurrent transaction modifies or deletes the same row before the first transaction has been completed. If the first transaction attempts to retrieve the row again, it will retrieve different data. This can occur in the read committed and repeatable read isolation levels.

  • Transaction 1: BEGIN TRANSACTION; SELECT * FROM TableX WHERE col1 = 10;
  • Transaction 2: BEGIN TRANSACTION; UPDATE TableX SET col2 = 'new_value' WHERE col1 = 10;
  • Transaction 1: SELECT * FROM TableX WHERE col1 = 10;

In this example, Transaction 1 begins a transaction and reads data from TableX where col1 is equal to 10. While Transaction 1 is still running, Transaction 2 begins a transaction and updates the same row with a new value for col2. When Transaction 1 reads the same row again, it reads the modified value for col2, even though the value was different when Transaction 1 first read the row. This is a non-repeatable read.

These phenomena can be problematic for database applications that require consistency and accuracy in the data. Choosing the appropriate isolation level for a given application can help minimize the occurrence of these phenomena. It’s important for database developers and administrators to understand these phenomena and design their applications accordingly, in order to ensure the integrity and reliability of their data.

+---------------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+--------------+----------+
|     Phenomenon      | Read Uncommitted | Read Committed | Repeatable Read | Serializable | Snapshot |
+---------------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+--------------+----------+
|     Phantom Read    |        Yes       |       Yes      |       Yes       |      Yes     |    No    |
+---------------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+--------------+----------+
|      Dirty Read     |        Yes       |       No       |       No        |      No      |    No    |
+---------------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+--------------+----------+
|  Nonrepeatable Read |        Yes       |       Yes      |       Yes       |      No      |    No    |
+---------------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+--------------+----------+

The table that we have been discussing is a general table that describes the phenomena and isolation levels that can occur in database transactions. These phenomena and isolation levels are relevant to most relational database management systems (RDBMS), such as Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle Database, and others. The specific behavior and implementation of these phenomena and isolation levels may differ slightly between different RDBMS, but the general concepts remain the same.

Conclusion

The choice of isolation level depends on the specific requirements of the application. Read Uncommitted provides the highest level of concurrency, but can result in non-repeatable reads and phantom reads. Read Committed provides a balance between concurrency and consistency, but can still result in non-repeatable reads and phantom reads. Repeatable Read provides a high level of consistency, but can still result in phantom reads. Serializable provides the highest level of consistency but can impact performance due to the need to acquire locks on entire tables. Snapshot provides the highest level of consistency and accuracy but can impact performance due to the need to maintain multiple snapshots. Understanding the trade-offs between these isolation levels is critical to building scalable and reliable database applications.

Useful Resources for further reading

Database
Isolation
Development
It
Technology
Recommended from ReadMedium
avatarJacob Bennett
The 5 paid subscriptions I actually use in 2025 as a Staff Software Engineer

Tools I use that are cheaper than Netflix

5 min read
avatarPeter K
Uncovering Node.js Internals: Minor Garbage Collection Algorithms

In Node.js, memory management is a critical aspect of performance. The V8 engine, which powers Node.js, uses two different types of garbage…

4 min read
avatarPriya Patidar
Indexing Unboxed: Beyond the Basics in Database Design

Introduction

6 min read
avatarEric Elliott
Identity Crisis: How Modern Applications Generate Unique Ids

TL;DR: Use Cuid2 so you don’t need to worry about all this identifier complexity.

8 min read
avatarLove Sharma
System Design Blueprint: The Ultimate Guide

Developing a robust, scalable, and efficient system can be daunting. However, understanding the key concepts and components can make the…

9 min read
avatarAmit Singh
Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) vs. Microservices

In today’s fast-evolving tech landscape, building scalable, maintainable, and flexible applications is essential. Both Service-Oriented…

5 min read