avatarSusie Kearley

Summary

The article discusses the variability and unpredictability of Medium's pay rates for writers, noting a significant discrepancy in earnings per minute of reading time across similar stories.

Abstract

The author of the article examines their earnings on Medium and observes a substantial difference in payment rates for stories with comparable reading times. Despite one story earning 30.84 for 16 hours and 46 minutes of reading time, another earned 1208.53 for 270 hours and 53 minutes, suggesting a rate more than double per minute. The author speculates on possible reasons for this discrepancy, including seasonal reading habits and the popularity of topics, but concludes that predicting earnings on Medium is challenging due to the unpredictable nature of both read time and the rate applied per minute of read time, which seems to be declining.

Opinions

  • The author is surprised by the significant variation in earnings between stories with similar content and by the same writer.
  • There is a suggestion that external factors, such as weather, might influence the amount of time members spend reading, thus affecting earnings.
  • The author expresses disappointment in the seemingly decreasing rates for stories that were once successful.
  • It is implied that Medium's payment algorithm or the distribution of membership fees among writers might be contributing to the unpredictability of earnings.
  • The author questions whether the topic saturation could be a factor in the reduced earnings per minute of read time.
  • The article conveys a sense of frustration regarding the inability to forecast potential earnings on Medium based on the observed data.

Trying to Understand Medium Pay Rates — Is It Me, or Are They Falling?

Let’s dive into the stats…

© Susie Kearley

Payment is based on member reading time, so let’s take a look at these stats and see what I’ve been paid for different read times…

My best performing story this month is this one, which has earned $30.84 to date. It’s accrued 16 hours and 46 minutes of reading time.

Screengrab by author

Now let’s compare it to this story, below, which has earned $1208.53 to date for 270 hours and 53 minutes reading time.

Screengrab by author

Members spent 16 times as long reading the second story, so I earned well from it. But 16 times $30.84 is $493, which means that even if the other stories accrued the same read time, I’d only earn $493 for it — compared to $1208.

The first story has earned less than half the amount per minute of read time than the second story. That’s surprising.

I know Medium pays us by splitting the membership fee, so the rate varies widely, but I’m surprised that it varies this much on similar stories by the same writer.

The first story was published on 4th March this year, but the better earning story was published in July 2022. I do wonder if members are reading a lot more now (due to cold weather) than they were in July, so writers get a smaller split of the fee for every minute of reading time in the winter. The weather’s rubbish now. It was hot and sunny in July. Could that explain the discrepancy?

Perhaps that’s a significant factor, but obviously it’s a bit disappointing trying to work out why topics that once did so well, seem to be dying, and why the reward is proportionally so much lower. Perhaps members have had enough of these kinds of stories. But that doesn’t explain the discrepancies between the rates.

Let’s take a look at another one. This story, below, accrued 182 hours, 15 minutes of read time and earned $550.64.

Screengrab by author

Members spent 11 times longer reading this story than my one at the top of this article. 11 times $30.84 (this month’s top earner) is $339, so again, it appears that a higher rate has been applied to the Greta story, published last November. The weather’s still rubbish, but November wasn’t exactly the height of summer either.

This basically means it’s impossible to get any sense of what you might earn from a story, because not only is the read time unpredictable, but even if you get a good read time, the rate applied per minute of read time is also unpredictable… and it appears to be falling!

What do you think is going on? Does the rate per minute improve when a story starts to take off? Why would that be?

Key Message: It’s virtually impossible to predict what your Medium earnings might be on any story!

© Susie Kearley 2023. All Rights Reserved.

More from me…

Medium
Writing
Blogging
Earnings
Money
Recommended from ReadMedium