avatarFrank Font

Summary

The provided text discusses the distinctions between truths, falsehoods, and lies, emphasizing that false predictions or assertions are not necessarily lies unless there is an intent to deceive.

Abstract

The article "Truths Falsehoods and Lies" elucidates the subtle differences between honest mistakes, incorrect assertions, and intentional deception. It argues that the opposite of truth is not a lie but rather a falsehood, which can be an honest error as seen in weather predictions or historical scientific beliefs, such as the geocentric model of the universe taught before Copernicus. The piece underscores that lies are characterized by the intent to mislead, regardless of the statement's truthfulness. It also differentiates between liars and the uninformed, suggesting that while anyone can be wrong, not everyone chooses to lie. The author advocates for recognizing the difference between falsehoods and lies to avoid excusing deceptive behavior and to navigate information critically.

Opinions

  • The author posits that incorrect predictions, such as those made by weather forecasters, are not lies but honest attempts that happen to be wrong.
  • Historical scientific teachings, like the sun orbiting the earth, were not lies but reflections of the knowledge available at the time.
  • A claim is only a lie if there is a deliberate intent to deceive; the truthfulness of the statement is secondary.
  • Sincerity is presented as the antithesis of lying, with the author emphasizing the importance of intent behind a statement.
  • The author warns against equating falsehoods with lies, as this can inadvertently condone dishonesty.
  • It is suggested that one should be cautious in trusting information from known liars, as their intent is to deceive rather than inform.

Truths Falsehoods and Lies

The opposite of truth is not a lie.

Yeah, that way.

When the weather person on the news predicts sunshine and instead it rains, did they lie? Of course not.

People make honest reasoned predictions that are wrong.

This is normal, and not just relevant to predicting the weather.

A prediction turning out to be false does not make it a lie.

Alternative facts?

Were scientists and educators prior to Copernicus liars teaching their students the sun orbits the earth? Of course not.

They were wrong and did not know that it’s actually the other way around.

Being wrong and teaching fiction as fact is a normal reality of the human condition and not just something that happens in the study of astronomy.

A claim that turns out to be false does not make the claim a lie.

So what is a lie?

Predictions and assertions are either true or false. Even lies can prove correct instead of wrong.

Lies require the intent to deceive. If the intent is there, whether the claim later proves true or false has no bearing.

What did the originator intend with their claim or prediction? This is the only question that can paint a statement as a lie or something else.

What is the opposite of a lie?

Sincerity is the opposite of a lie.

They are both children of intent but differ from each other in all ways that matter.

A mind’s motivation is either to express sincerity or it is not. If not, watch out for lies.

Let’s distinguish between liars and the uninformed. One can be helped, the other is better to avoid.

Why does this matter?

Anyone can be wrong.

Not everyone chooses to lie.

When we don’t distinguish falsehoods from lies we give liars a pass, as if they were the same as confused or uninformed.

Don’t give liars a pass.

And don’t go down roads where a liar made the map.

Art
Philosophy
Honesty
Logic
Dialogue
Recommended from ReadMedium