avatarDavid Pahor

Summary

The article discusses the delicate balance between truth and kindness when delivering disappointing news, emphasizing the importance of personal growth and the individual's capacity to step out of their comfort zone.

Abstract

The article "Truth and Kindness in the Unsanctioned Zone" reflects on the challenge of delivering bad news with authority, suggesting that the ability to do so hinges on one's proximity to their personal 'forbidden zone.' It recalls a past narrative where 'The Garrulous Glaswegian' grappled with rejecting a subpar author, weighing the kindness of silence against the honesty of truth. The author posits that while truth is philosophically noble, practical life often demands a more nuanced approach. Social instincts may lead to insincerity for the sake of harmony. However, personal development necessitates occasional discomfort, and each individual must gauge their own tolerance for operating outside their comfort zone. The article suggests a personal rule for determining when to be truthful and when to revert to 'soothing misrepresentation.' It also touches on the concept of 'The Zone,' a metaphorical space where normal rules do not apply and where one may confront the uncomfortable truth, akin to Andrei Tarkovsky's philosophical musings. The article concludes with the caution that some truths and wishes are best left unexplored, even in the company of a knowledgeable guide.

Opinions

  • Truth in delivering disappointing news is important but must be balanced with kindness and the potential impact on the recipient.
  • Social pressures often lead individuals to prioritize harmony over honesty, opting for insincerity to maintain 'well-lubricated waterslides' of relationships.
  • Stepping out of one

Truth and Kindness in the Unsanctioned Zone

Delivering disappointing news as a person of authority depends on how far from the forbidden zone you are in your life

Photo by Viktor Kharlashkin on Unsplash

At one time, in a story now devoured by a deliberating dragonesse, The Garrulous Glaswegian asked herself and us how to reject an author whose writing was not of a standard she wished to publish.

If my memory serves me right — though in the meantime many empires have crumpled to dust, and uncountable princesses have seduced the uncouth barbarian— G.G. of Fire and Resoluteness pensively set to paper:

“Is it kinder to say nothing and let them think I’m a (insert slur or insult) — or to tell them the truth?”

So; is it kinder?

On a philosophical level, it is always best to tell the truth.

But shit ain’t like that in real life, if I risk repeating myself.

Our instincts for social integration urge us to glide on well-lubricated waterslides, despatching us to the common pools of insincere comradeship. It is not a question of kindness, but of what you are capable of doing at the current point in your life without straying too much out of your comfort zone. On the other hand, your tolerance of out-zoning changes as your life progresses. As Andrei Tarkovsky once commented, “No mother gives birth to the same child twice.”

Venturing out of your comfort zone is, by definition, disquieting.

It is, however, every so often necessary for upholding a well-balanced personality; without it, there is no credible learning and development of self. The only question is how much “extra zonam” wayfaring would be too much?

Each of us should measure and mark the latter ourselves. My rule of thumb is fifteen minutes of agitation for run-of-the-mill decisions; if your deed of forthrightness causes lengthier convulsions, return to the safety of soothing misrepresentation. I hope you find this intriguing, if not helpful.

P.S.

The sage and savvy understand that outside the comfort zone a rambling expanse of no-man’s land stretches between the horizons, bitter under the shimmer of foreign skies.

There are, though, a few times in life when the honest decide to secure an Answer and make their way across the immensity to visit the dangerous place of The Zone, an area in which normal laws do not prevail and which harbours a Room. Think twice of entering the Room that grants wishes, even if you are in the company of a well-versed Stalker.

The latter holds for all petitioners, regardless of whether they be the novice writer who sorely lacks both competence and self-doubt or the savant who solely desires resoluteness in breaking the bad news to the incapable.

But if there is one thing that Dragons and Stalkers agree upon wholeheartedly, it is that some wishes should stay unanswered.

My other hallucinations

Mindfulness
Writers On Medium
Dilemma
Lifehacks
Mindset
Recommended from ReadMedium