avatarJessica M.

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

549

Abstract

he <i>Washington Post,</i> where she equates the potential reversal of Roe v. Wade, to a woman turning back into a vessel. I’m not a stranger to essays written in the third person. However, what stood out to me the most in this piece was the use of the word “vessel”. Something about it sparked a visceral reaction. A reminder, perhaps, of that one Greek mythology class I took in college, where we discussed how women were treated as nothing more than vessels for (preferably male) children.</p><p id="7be8">My brain — being the wonderland that it

Options

is — decided to run with it. <i>“What if you took that statement literally? If women are vessels in all the ways that matter, being literal isn’t that far of a jump.”</i></p><p id="d218">I love satire. In considering Ms. Petri’s piece, I found myself wondering, “<i>Can you push satire into the absurd and have it still hold?” </i>There was only one way to find out.</p><figure id="e241"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/0*3oMZZN0r7l7oji_Y"><figcaption>Original Artwork by Author</figcaption></figure></article></body>

The Worst Kind of Cinderella Story

A Roe v. Wade re-telling (of a re-telling)

When I used to hear people talking about history repeating itself, I thought they were speaking of it happening on a generational timeline, not the minute we no longer had a pumpkin dumpling running the country. Joke’s on me I guess.

I read Alexandra Petri’s opinion piece for the Washington Post, where she equates the potential reversal of Roe v. Wade, to a woman turning back into a vessel. I’m not a stranger to essays written in the third person. However, what stood out to me the most in this piece was the use of the word “vessel”. Something about it sparked a visceral reaction. A reminder, perhaps, of that one Greek mythology class I took in college, where we discussed how women were treated as nothing more than vessels for (preferably male) children.

My brain — being the wonderland that it is — decided to run with it. “What if you took that statement literally? If women are vessels in all the ways that matter, being literal isn’t that far of a jump.”

I love satire. In considering Ms. Petri’s piece, I found myself wondering, “Can you push satire into the absurd and have it still hold?” There was only one way to find out.

Original Artwork by Author
Feminism
Illustration
Nonfiction
Supreme Court
Critique
Recommended from ReadMedium