avatarNanie Hurley 🌿

Summary

The world is currently on a trajectory to exceed a 3°C temperature rise by the end of the century, with the Paris Agreement's current measures only limiting this to between 2.5°C and 2.9°C, highlighting the urgent need for more aggressive climate action to prevent catastrophic consequences.

Abstract

The article underscores the critical state of climate change, indicating that despite the Paris Agreement, the planet is likely to experience a temperature increase of 2.5°C to 2.9°C by 2100, surpassing the 2°C threshold that could lead to devastating impacts on humanity and the environment. The UN's 2023 Emissions Gap Report warns of a potential 3°C rise if current trends continue. However, there is still a possibility to limit warming to 1.5°C, which would significantly reduce the risks of climate catastrophe. The article emphasizes that climate change denial persists, despite clear scientific evidence of human-induced global warming. It calls for a swift transition away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy sources, as well as increased action from global governments and citizens to demand and enact change.

Opinions

  • Climate change denial is prevalent and problematic, often driven by economic, political, or ignorant motivations.
  • The scientific community has provided clear evidence of increasing global temperatures and their anthropogenic causes.
  • The UN's 2023 Emissions Gap Report forecasts a 2.9°C temperature rise by the end of the century, emphasizing the urgency for more effective climate policies.
  • Seth Godin's quote suggests that forecasts are not definitive and can change with our actions.
  • Antònio Guterres, the UN Secretary-General, stresses the need for a just and equitable transition to renewable energy to address the root cause of the climate crisis.
  • The article highlights the sensitivity of butterflies to climate change as an indicator of broader ecological vulnerabilities.
  • The recent spike in global average temperature above 2°C pre-industrial levels serves as a warning sign of the potential for irreversible climate change impacts.
  • The article criticizes the current pace of progress in reducing emissions, stating it is insufficient to meet the targets necessary to limit temperature increases to 1.5°C or even 2°C.
  • It calls for citizens to demand more decisive action from their governments and to consider climate action when exercising their voting rights.

The World Is on Track To Surpass 3°C This Century

The Paris Agreement measures put the world on a path to reach 2.5°C to 2.9°C global temperature increase before 2100

The consequences of a global average temperature increase above 2°C will be devastating for humanity. | © Image credit: Nanie Hurley 🌿 with Canva using image by piyaset from Getty ImagesCC-BY.

Climate change denial is still a thing. Unfortunately, more common than the scientific community would like it to be.

There’s clear evidence of increasing global temperatures and that it’s caused by human activity. And yet, motivated economically, politically or by sheer ignorance, many people still believe climate change isn’t real. There’s always some explanation as an excuse. It cascades down a list that starts with the climate is always changing, passing through the warming isn’t man-made and humans are great at adapting to changes, and finishing with some of the doomsday worst-case scenarios never came to pass. Thankfully they haven’t, yet, but they still might.

UN’s 2023 Emissions Gap Report released earlier this month talks about Earth’s average temperature reaching a whopping 3°C above pre-industrial levels by the end of the century. Well, technically, the forecast is for 2.9°C. That’s a forecast, so of course, it might not happen.

“The shifting of forecasts is evidence that they’re merely forecasts.” — Seth Godin.

Spot on, Seth Godin. That number is only a prediction and thus susceptible to change. The world is on track to a 2.9°C temperature rise above pre-industrial levels. But only if we continue doing what we’re doing. If the signatories of the Paris Agreement fully implement what they said they would, the world will reach temperatures 2.5°C to 2.9°C higher than pre-industrial levels this century.

But it’s not 2100 yet. The UN report isn’t a history lesson talking about historical measurements. It’s a forecast. We still have time to change things; keeping the temperature increase to the hopeful 1.5°C level is still possible. It’s not all gloom and doom.

“We know it is still possible to make the 1.5 degree limit a reality. It requires tearing out the poisoned root of the climate crisis: fossil fuels. And it demands a just, equitable renewables transition.” — Antònio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations.

But it’s not all rainbows and butterflies, either. Butterflies are one of the most sensitive insects to climate change, so their existence is in grave peril. And so is ours. If temperatures rise above the 2°C threshold, the consequences could be catastrophic, including dangerous environmental changes, such as mass extinction, sea level rises, reduced crop yields, droughts and floods, and serious negative impacts on human health and wellbeing.

Earlier this month, global average temperature spiked above 2°C pre-industrial levels. For now, that was just a spike. One day. But it’s a bad sign. The UN report confirms that nations must go beyond what the Paris Agreement pledges to reduce 2030 emissions by at least 28%, keeping the Earth’s average temperature under the 2°C threshold; emissions must be reduced even further, by 42%, if we’re to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C. There has been some progress in the last few years, but not enough.

Predictions are only predictions. Forecasts may show themselves to be wrong. Scientists use the best models available to them to create such predictions. However, they are limited by the available data and what they choose to use.

The 2023 Emissions Gap report brings projections slightly higher than in 2022, as it used more models of estimation of global warming in an attempt to get more accurate and realistic predictions. The complexity of our world can’t be perfectly mimicked by a scientific model alone. And even a large set of models can be flawed in one way or another. But the models are the best we have, and they’re all giving us a warning. Time is running out. The world’s governments need to step up their climate actions if humanity is to have a future. As citizens, we need to demand action from our representatives and use our voting rights to elect those willing to deal with the crisis.

Climate Change
Environment
Sustainability
Politics
Climate Action
Recommended from ReadMedium