avatarGustave Deresse | Writer; AI Artist

Summary

The article discusses a method for naturally observing synchronicities in time, specifically on clocks, by waiting for a specific moment like '2:22' after noticing '2:21'.

Abstract

The author presents a personal approach to recognizing and appreciating synchronicities, particularly with time, without becoming overly reliant on checking the clock. This method, referred to as the "One Minute Rule," involves patiently waiting for a synchronous moment, such as seeing '2:22' after catching '2:21', and savoring the anticipation and arrival of such times. The author argues that this practice should be organic and not forced, suggesting that a minute is a fair and non-addictive amount of time to invest in experiencing these meaningful coincidences.

Opinions

  • The author believes that synchronicities should occur naturally and not be sought out obsessively.
  • There is a notion that life's meaningful moments are not experienced by constantly watching the clock.
  • The author enjoys the anticipation of synchronous moments and considers the wait for such moments as a test of patience.
  • The article suggests that waiting for a synchronous time like '2:22' is a harmless and non-addictive activity if done in moderation.
  • The author emphasizes the importance of not forcing synchronicities to happen and views the one-minute window as a respectable limit for this practice.
  • The anticipation and experience of synchronicities are seen as valuable and enriching experiences by the author.

Synchronicity

The One Minute Rule For Catching Synchronicities of Time

The most appropriate method I could devise

Photo by Wilhelm Gunkel on Unsplash

It’s like a mini pop-quiz on patience — one you only take at all your favourite times, and only when they’re a surprise!

Our dear synchronicities.

Especially on clocks.

You love for them to happen naturally.

It’s also tempting to look for them.

I understand perfectly well.

Yet…

Shouldn’t catching the time remain organic?

Necessity put aside, life doesn’t happen while staring at the clock.

Synchronicities can never — should never — be forced upon.

At least, not usually.

One minute isn’t too valuable, is it?

Don’t ponder too hard, we’re about to catch a ‘2:22’!!

Having looked at 2:21 — it’s fair game, without a doubt!

For what is a minute, but fair time to flout?

If controlled, it’s not addiction, you see?

But I live for the opportunity to anticipate this very moment.

Once arrived, I’ve reached the point of no return.

Less than a minute left to pass?

It’s official; there’s no turning back!

I’m pleased to hold my gaze, waiting quietly for this digit to change.

For one minute isn’t too valuable.

Is that so crass?

Gustave Deresse is a Canadian writer whose primary themes of writing include spirituality, philosophy, relationships, humour, wellbeing, the weird, and — mandatorily — self development.

You have the option to sign up through any writer’s profile to support them and their writing.

Here’s me. ⬇️⬇️

Take care. 🙏 🙏 🙏

Time
Synchronicity
Values
Addiction
Ineclectic
Recommended from ReadMedium