The Human That Could Never Be A Dog

Such a powerful paradox in which everyone keeps lying to themselves that there is actual unconditional love.

If I would be to put in one sentence, the condition of unconditional love would be children.

And perhaps even then some parents would express more or less love regarding the status or ambition of the child, so, what are we talking about? Even in a family, conditional love exists, sadly, but it does.

How many families got broken due to financial status or legacies?

Why everyone re-unite when someone dies only?

Or when “Jesus is born?”

I think somehow everything is conditioned.

I am going to rephrase my statement.

The condition of unconditional love is: be a dog!

I think that’s the only form of unconditional love, and yes, one hand because he is the purest soul there is, but on the other hand, a dog can’t make too big mistakes, I mean, the worst he can do is chew on your shoes right? So that’s technically impossible to make your love conditioned because it’s nothing huge, but what if dogs could betray and fuck you up like a family member or a friend? Your love would automatically be conditioned.

Therefore, conditional love has been created due to our expectations for people, our lack of trust, due to our feelings towards someone that are constantly changing.

We made it conditional, if everyone was a dog and the only mistake would be me chewing your shoe, you’d love me unconditionally.

Let’s be dogs in this universe filled with too many humans.

Thank you for this amazing prompt Diana, there’s so much more to say but I would write without stopping, and in the end… it’s all philosophy because unconditional love will perhaps never exist among humans.