avatarJeremy Enns

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

7237

Abstract

ing the media world in a fairly unique and trusting way for months now. Most public figures in his position have people advising them on media strategy, what to say, and what not to say — how to frame things so you are not misquoted. Which interviews to take on and which to refuse. Moreover, probably not to allow two solid days behind the scenes to someone who you think may have an agenda.</p><p id="2ef6">As far as I can tell, he doesn’t have this and has embraced and is fully living out his own dictum — “speak the truth and let the pieces fall where they may”.</p><p id="21b3">So far speaking the truth has worked out well for him — he was lucky that Channel 4 News put up the Cathy Newman interview unedited — a decision I’m sure that they quickly regretted. <b>This New York Times piece feels different </b>— that it will solidify impressions of him on either side.</p><p id="6328"><b>“Bad faith changes everything”</b></p><p id="cf22">As Eric Weinstein, Bret’s brother, and another member of the unofficial ‘intellectual dark web’ said — “bad faith changes everything”. It’s possible to have any kind of discussion with people you disagree with so long as they are approaching it in good faith — as soon as they are not, they’re just looking to boost their position, look good in front of others or advance their career within their tribe — as Peterson alleged Cathy Newman was — then true exchange of ideas is impossible.</p><p id="c6f9">I would argue that this journalist is indeed acting in bad faith. Some of the misrepresentations cannot be put down to simple misunderstanding.</p><p id="7c74">The piece of the interview that has been seized upon is this:</p><blockquote id="f129"><p>“Recently, a young man named Alek Minassian drove through Toronto trying to kill people with his van. Ten were killed, and he has been charged with first-degree murder for their deaths, and with attempted murder for 16 people who were injured. Mr. Minassian declared himself to be part of a misogynist group whose members call themselves incels. The term is short for “involuntary celibates,” though the group has evolved into a male supremacist movement made up of people — some celibate, some not — who believe that women should be treated as sexual objects with few rights. Some believe in forced “sexual redistribution,” in which a governing body would intervene in women’s lives to force them into sexual relationships.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="8111"><p>Violent attacks are what happens when men do not have partners, Mr. Peterson says, and society needs to work to make sure those men are married.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="005a"><p>“He was angry at God because women were rejecting him,” Mr. Peterson says of the Toronto killer. “The cure for that is enforced monogamy. That’s actually why monogamy emerges.”</p></blockquote><blockquote id="f00b"><p>Mr. Peterson does not pause when he says this. Enforced monogamy is, to him, simply a rational solution. Otherwise women will all only go for the most high-status men, he explains, and that couldn’t make either gender happy in the end.”</p></blockquote><p id="4fb7">The framing of it makes it sound like he’s advocating for some kind of “government/state enforced” monogamy — which is malicious. He — as anyone who has been listening to his lectures will tell you — is making a more subtle point.</p><p id="924a">That monogamy is an evolved trait to stabilise societies — it’s “enforced” only as a social rule. Many societies in the past have had polygamy or other situations where a small number of men had access to many women (as do many animal societies), and that proved to be unstable and a bad long term solution to social harmony.</p><p id="7529">So in this argument, the reason that monogamy evolves (and is socially enforced) is to avoid the kind of situation where you end up with too many bitter young men wanting to tear things down. Which — whether you agree with his reading or not — seems to be happening.</p><p id="c544">And he also argues — that one of the consequences of the sexual revolution of the 60s is that it has loosened sexual behaviour. When that happens, and there are less social and physiological downsides (pregnancy is not inevitable) — and more sex is being had — the spoils go disproportionately to the most attractive men.</p><p id="7716">He is arguing that there are deeper reasons for the morality that we evolved over our history, and that there are consequences to the kinds of lifestyle experiments that we saw start to accelerate in the 1960s. This is what the essence of Peterson’s message is about.</p><p id="fb0d">You can disagree with Peterson, but many people are recognising that this fits their experience of the world — hence his popularity. That the increasingly boundary-less world we’ve created is not working and we need a reintegration of these traditional values.</p><p id="ad84"><b>Ideological fixation</b></p><p id="89ce">Personally I agree with Peterson that much of our culture and media is in the grip of an ideology that styles itself as open, inclusive and tolerant, but actually has a shadow side of intolerance towards those that don’t share their values.</p> <figure id="3404"> <div> <div> <img class="ratio" src="http://placehold.it/16x9"> <iframe class="" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FaMcjxSThD54%3Fstart%3D1511%26feature%3Doembed%26start%3D1511&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DaMcjxSThD54&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FaMcjxSThD54%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="480" width="854"> </div> </div> </figure></iframe></div></div></figure><p id="731c">One of the sacred cows in this is the belief that the only reason that men and women don’t have equal representation in many industries and top jobs is because of discrimination, not differing choices. This was famously the subject of the clash with Cathy Newman.</p><p id="fc16">If these activists (and the liberal left generally) has to accept that there are measurable differences in temperament, values and life choices made by men and women, and that some of them are likely tied to biology and evolutionary history — then the entire edifice of this ‘gender ideology’ movement starts to shake. We would realise that it would be irrational to expect 50/50 representation in many jobs, for example.</p><p id="8022">And realise that this is not just a social movement — this ideological framing — it’s a big industry. There are charities, organisations and groups that are funded on the basis of this that have huge impact on the media conversation, and business practice.</p><p id="e742">So left-wingers who are usually concerned about the impact of money on ideology and political decisions from corporate interests, might wish to look at the fact that these are major financial interests as well. It is not possible for this entire industry to look at the data accurately.</p><p id="b543">I would also frame it in this way that might resonate

Options

with left-wing thinkers. Why are you using capitalist metrics like pay to decide on whether women have achieved equality? Isn’t that just another version of the ‘patriarchy’ controlling your minds? How has “the man” persuaded you that equal pay is the right metric to look for equal respect and value?</p><p id="b245">What makes women actually fulfilled and gives genuine meaning in life? Is it the same as for men? I doubt it, and I personally know many women who made that realisation too late in life to easily have a balanced life that included children.</p><p id="5cc1">But anything that argues against leftist ideology is attacked and smeared. For example the infamous ‘Google memo’ was a case in point, being described as an ‘anti-diversity screed’ throughout the media despite the author, James Damore, specifically making suggestions that would increase the representation of women in tech. This article from the Atlantic — from a writer who doesn’t agree with Damore’s conclusions — gives good context to its misrepresentation: “To me, the Google memo is an outlier — I cannot remember the last time so many outlets and observers mischaracterized so many aspects of a text everyone possessed.”</p><p id="3999">Liberalism as an ideology, with those inside and outside the tribe. Those outside the tribe, like Peterson — deserve scorn, derision, and even misrepresentation.</p><p id="11cc">Another hard to explain mischaracterisation, if the journalist had any familiarity with Peterson’s work is this:</p><blockquote id="33b8"><p>“Mr. Peterson illustrates his arguments with copious references to ancient myths — bringing up stories of witches, biblical allegories and ancient traditions. I ask why these old stories should guide us today.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="f195"><p>“It makes sense that a witch lives in a swamp. Yeah,” he says. “Why?”</p></blockquote><blockquote id="69ec"><p>It’s a hard one.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="0ac8"><p>“Right. That’s right. You don’t know. It’s because those things hang together at a very deep level. Right. Yeah. And it makes sense that an old king lives in a desiccated tower.”</p></blockquote><blockquote id="fc08"><p>But witches don’t exist, and they don’t live in swamps, I say.</p></blockquote><blockquote id="e8f8"><p>“Yeah, they do. They do exist. They just don’t exist the way you think they exist. They certainly exist. You may say well dragons don’t exist. It’s, like, yes they do — the category predator and the category dragon are the same category. It absolutely exists. It’s a superordinate category. It exists absolutely more than anything else. In fact, it really exists. What exists is not obvious. You say, ‘Well, there’s no such thing as witches.’ Yeah, I know what you mean, but that isn’t what you think when you go see a movie about them. You can’t help but fall into these categories. There’s no escape from them.”</p></blockquote><p id="3287">He is deliberately framed here as an old crank, an eccentric who believes in dragons and witches. Yet throughout his lectures he has made clear he is talking psychologically, archetypally and mythologically.</p><p id="67f0">In this view they exist in our mythology in a very real way as representations of psychological realities, for example that the dragon is the mythological representation of the ‘unknown’. Throughout our history if you ventured out into the unknown you could die — but there was no other way to discover new information or new rewards.</p><p id="cc2a">So the dragon is a composite predator of all the animals that used to prey on humans — a cat/snake/bird — and of course in mythology dragons have gold (or virginal women in captivity). The deep psychological story is that by confronting the unknown, you can achieve riches. He’s made that abundantly clear in every lecture.</p><p id="2105">What is becoming ever clearer (and again is something Peterson points out) — the death spiral of the print media is speeding up polarisation — in even the most reputable organisations such as the New York Times start to produce clickbait such as the Jordan Peterson article.</p><p id="4e32">Perhaps the New York Times have decided to take a leaf out of the book of the 4chan culture, and provocateurs like Milo Yiannopolous who made whole careers out of provoking the left into overreaction. In this case — the NYT have placed this article behind a paywall (I’m told) — so to read it, outraged Peterson fans will have to subscribe to the paper.</p><p id="255f">Then to unsubscribe — I know because I just checked — you cannot unsubscribe online, you have to call them. This seems at least unethical.</p><p id="5aaf">The most dangerous part of this whole enterprise is that Peterson has now become pretty much the singular focus of the ramping up of the culture wars — the lightning rod, if you will. Articles like this add hugely to the polarisation he warns about.</p><p id="46ed">On one side you have literally tens of thousands of people (mainly, but not all men) who have had their lives changed, and many claiming actually saved, by listening to Jordan Peterson’s words. On the other side you have a mix of hard core ideological opponents to him, and a vast middle ground who don’t know him well — but are almost certainly thinking that there is no smoke without fire.</p><p id="6c75">He has argued frequently that we are in an increasingly polarised world and that individual actions can have serious consequences, if we don’t act with integrity, or we sacrifice our morality and conscience in any way.</p><p id="c074">This journalist spent two days with Peterson in his house, she seemingly has some familiarity with his work, and yet chooses to characterise him in this way.</p><p id="9c1a">The treatment of Jordan Peterson is speeding up the irrelevance of the mainstream media at an increasing rate. Too many people are aware of his work and who he is and what he believes for the hit pieces to stick.</p><p id="3463">In the language of the internet subculture — the treatment of Jordan Peterson by the mainstream media is showing up their ideology, and Red Pilling an entire generation.</p> <figure id="41f6"> <div> <div> <img class="ratio" src="http://placehold.it/16x9"> <iframe class="" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FYDxl1stMTCU%3Fstart%3D193%26feature%3Doembed%26start%3D193&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DYDxl1stMTCU&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FYDxl1stMTCU%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="480" width="854"> </div> </div> </figure></iframe></div></div></figure><p id="8453">For more documentaries and interviews, check out the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFQ6Gptuq-sLflbJ4YY3Umw?view_as=subscriber">Rebel Wisdom Youtube channel</a>.</p><p id="0b51">My personal website: <a href="http://davidfuller.tv/">http://davidfuller.tv/</a></p><p id="a4b2">And please consider <a href="https://www.patreon.com/rebelwisdom">supporting us on Patreon</a>.</p></article></body>

The 5 Pillars of Real Marketing

Photo by Tatiana from Pexels

Marketing has an optics problem.

When most people think about marketing, their minds are instantly filled with all the worst kinds of “marketers.”

Telemarketers, accident and injury lawyers, and any of the thousands of less than reputable internet marketers top the list.

But following only a short way behind these paragons of marketing are all of the less sleazy-but perhaps more annoying in their omnipresence-brands focused on mass-marketing us all into oblivion by bombarding us with advertising every second of our lives.

Sure, these examples are one form of marketing. But are they effective and sustainable strategies for people like us, who are trying to make a difference in the world through the work we do and make a living off of it?

We want our marketing to reflect the heart and effort we put into our products, for people to get a sense of what it must be like to work with us based on how we show up in our marketing.

For people like us, it’s time we adopt a new ideal of marketing. One that’s aligned with our values, the people we serve, and the work we create.

At its core, real, effective, repeatable marketing that works is about nothing more than building authentic relationships with our audiences.

That’s it.

It’s a simple concept, but it’s not easy to execute.

So to dive into what real marketing means and how you can start constructing a system around building deeper relationships with your audience, let’s look at the five keys to relationship-based marketing.

1. Empathy

All relationship-building needs to start with empathy for your audience.

You may already understand something about their general circumstances, where they’re trying to go, and the challenges standing in their way of getting there, you may have even lived that journey yourself.

You must always keep in mind, however, that even though you’re all on the same journey together, each of your audience members has a unique story, unique fears, unique motivations, and unique challenges.

To ensure that your messaging resonates, you must continually be digging deeper to learn more about your audience without judgment.

Only by truly understanding your audience and holding a deep empathy for who they are and where they’re at can you create the best possible solutions to their challenges, and speak to them in a way that clearly communicates to them that you get them.

Once you understand your audience, it’s time to define the journey you want them to join you on.

2. Vision

Effective marketing has forward momentum that builds continually towards a clearly defined goal.

You might initially think of the end goal as the sale, but this is not the end goal for your audience and it shouldn’t be for you either.

There’s nothing wrong with hoping that a portion of your audience ends up buying from you. But when you start focusing on winning the sale as your driving goal, you begin to lose focus on what the real purpose of all effective marketing is: Guiding your audience toward their desired outcome.

To do this, you need to take everything you know about your audience and the hurdles in their way and map out the journey to get there.

Your route to the end destination may not be the only one, but it’s your job as a marketer to say “Hey! I see where you’re trying to go and I know a way there. It might not be the best route for everyone, but for people like you, I think it is.”

Invite people along for however much of the journey they care to be along for, and while they’re with you, do everything you can to help them get to the next milestone.

In all likelihood, your product or service does not immediately solve your customer’s problem once they buy from you. It may help move them closer, but in most cases, they still have more work ahead of them.

Effective marketing recognizes this and is prepared to continue guiding customers along their journey, even after they’ve bought from you, even if you don’t have a further upsell down the road (yet).

Think about it in the context of another type of relationship.

You wouldn’t go to bed with someone and then never contact them again, and neither should your marketing.

People don’t want to feel used.

3. Initiative/Organization

One of the most important steps you can take as a marketer is to realize that most people already know what they need to do to get themselves at least most of the way to the goal they’re striving for.

The information is out there, for free, probably dozens of times over. There’s no shortage of knowledge available for those willing to tap into it.

What there is a shortage of, however, is leaders who are willing to stand up and organize a community of like-minded people who are on the same journey together.

The fact is that information alone is often not enough, especially when it comes to the really big goals we’ve set for ourselves. More than information alone, people need support, accountability, feedback, commiserators and community to help get them through The Hard Stuff on their journey.

This is not easy work. But if you’re willing to step up and organize your audience in a meaningful way, you’ll set yourself apart from everyone else in your niche and your community will start to do your marketing for you.

4. Service

Leading with a service mentality is a mindset that you’ll likely need to remind yourself of continually at the start.

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with selling your experience, your guidance, your knowledge, your products or your services that will help your audience solve their problems.

In fact, your audience will be more than happy to pay you if your work lives up to the promise it makes.

So leading with a service mentality has nothing to do with giving away your work for free. Rather it’s about making decisions about your products, marketing, and the way you run your business and create content based on what will be most helpful to your audience.

There will certainly be times when you might be faced with a decision between crafting a product or service one way that benefits you more than your audience versus another that might benefit your audience more than you.

There’s a balance to find here. You need to know your margins both financially and time-wise.

While it might benefit your audience the most in the short term if you were to offer your products and services for free, before long, you couldn’t afford to keep doing the work you do — ie. helping your audience solve their problem — and you’d have no choice but to pack it in, leaving them without the trusted guide they had relied on to that point.

No one wins in this scenario.

The important thing is to always be leading with the mindset of “What could I create that would be of most value to my audience? What is the best possible way I can help them get where they’re going?”

This mindset requires empathy, for you to see and understand your audience, and the two traits are essential for marketing that builds authentic relationships.

5. Consistency

All relationships require consistently showing up, especially in the beginning stages, and the rule is no different when it comes to your marketing.

It’s not just about showing up, however.

You need to show up consistently and authentically with empathy, vision, leadership, and service for your audience.

There’s a lot of talk in the worlds of podcasting, blogging, and social media about consistency and scheduling. Often it revolves around your audience losing interest, forgetting about you, and playing the algorithms in order to get the most reach.

These may all be valid concerns, but there’s a more important argument to be made for consistency, and it comes down to trust.

Your content and offers may be fantastic, you may show up with all the traits we’ve discussed above, but I’m convinced that by failing to be consistent with your content and interaction with your audience, you’re introducing a seed of doubt into their minds as to whether or not you can actually deliver on your bigger promises.

It’s probably not even a conscious thought for most people, but if you’ve established the expectation that you’ll release a weekly podcast and start to falter in your release schedule, is it unreasonable for your listeners to begin to question whether that same inconsistency might carry over into your paid offerings?

After all, in their minds, the paid offerings probably take a whole lot more work than a podcast to create. If their subconscious impression of you is that you don’t follow through on the “easy” things, why should they believe that you’ll come through for them on the hard ones?

Effective Marketing Isn’t Easy

In my mind, these five traits form the foundation of effective marketing for people like you and me, who believe deeply in the work we do, recognize the potential for impact our work can have, and ultimately want to be paid well and make our living doing it.

This type of marketing is not about hacks, tactics, shiny new marketing tools or quick wins.

Instead, our type of marketing takes the long view and understands that if we take the time to show up generously every day, drip by drip by drip as Seth Godin would say, we have the opportunity to find and build meaningful relationships with people who are looking to go where we’re going.

If we choose to take this approach, the patient approach, the approach that might at first glance look like the long way around, we’re committing not to creating customers — although those will come naturally — but to creating a loyal tribe of raving fans built on an authentic relationship with us.

This is the path to creating impact with our work, to building a movement, to creating something new with the knowledge that when we release it, we have an audience that is not only interested in buying it, but is impatiently waiting for us to release it.

This is the path to changing the world with your ideas and your work.

Want to hear more about building an audience around work that matters? I think you might enjoy these reads!

Online Marketing
Content Marketing
Podcasting
Marketing Strategies
Entrepreneurship
Recommended from ReadMedium