The 2023 Writers’ Strike: 18 Years In The Making
As of writing the 2023 Writers Guild of America strike has been going on for over 3 months. 3 months and 3 weeks which is pretty long. It’s already longer than the 2007 and 1981 WGA strikes although not as long as the 1988 and 1960 WGA strikes both of which lasted approximately 150 days.
But it’s possible that this strike will soon surpass even those. As reported by deadline
Receiving positive feedback from Wall Street since the WGA went on strike May 2, Warner Bros Discovery, Apple, Netflix, Amazon, Disney, Paramount and others have become determined to “break the WGA,” as one studio exec blatantly put it.
To do so, the studios and the AMPTP believe that by October most writers will be running out of money after five months on the picket lines and no work.
“The endgame is to allow things to drag on until union members start losing their apartments and losing their houses,” a studio executive told Deadline. Acknowledging the cold-as-ice approach, several other sources reiterated the statement. One insider called it “a cruel but necessary evil.”
The strike started on May 2nd. If it lasts until October that would make it a 153 day long strike. The 1988 WGA strike was 153 days and that is the longest WGA strike I know about. Coincidence? I think not. It looks like the entertainment industry is using the same tactics they’ve used before to crush the strike.
But it’s that last line, “A cruel but necessary evil.” which got me thinking. Is it cruel? Definitely. Is it necessary? That’s a much more difficult question. But if you really think about it, it is necessary in a way. In a cruel way. Because the truth is that this strike didn’t just randomly start on May 2nd. It didn’t even start with the arrival of ChatGPT in November of last year. No, it started 18 years ago.
2005
We start our journey in 2005. Even before the previous WGA strike, oddly enough.
These were dark times. The idea of ‘streaming’, of having hundreds or even thousands of movies just a click away was a distant fantasy. Instead in order to watch a movie you would have to obtain a physical copy of it. Usually you’d go to the store (or some movie rental service), pick something you like, and bring it home. Or I guess you could use your TV’s recording functionality to record a movie or TV show.
But what if they didn’t have anything you were interested in? Then you could go to mail order services. You’d have to select a DVD and have it mailed to you. This is how Netflix started.
But in 2005 we also had the internet. We also had torrents. And we had The Pirate Bay. You could go there and in only a few clicks you could download any movie you could think of. So driving to the store? Selecting a DVD to be mailed to you? Why would anyone do that if you could just go to a website and download one of thousands of movies for free? The entertainment industry had a massive piracy problem.
So who does the entertainment industry call for help in their moment of desperation? Steve Jobs. I bet you thought I’d say Netflix. No, Netflix didn’t enter streaming until later. And Steve Jobs had beaten piracy before, in the music industry with iTunes. See, the music industry, just like the TV and movie industry, also had a major piracy problem. Apple forced music companies to unbundle their music and make them all available for 99 cents. This significantly reduced piracy. And in 2005 Steve Jobs boldly proclaimed:
We’re doing for video what we’ve done for music — we’re making it easy and affordable to purchase and download [videos], play [them] on your computer, and take [them] with you on your iPod
So in 2005 with the introduction of iTunes 6 Steve Jobs announced that you could download popular TV shows for $1.99 the day after they aired on TV. This was pretty big. But Apple wasn’t a big company at the time. We were still over a year away from ‘a widescreen iPod with touch controls’.
And this was still a digital download. It wasn’t as convenient as streaming. So fast forward to 2006 and the first streaming competitor appeared: not Netflix, but Amazon Unbox, later renamed to Amazon Prime Video. And after that another player appeared: Hulu.
Now you may have never heard of Hulu before. I’m not exactly sure why it didn’t get as popular as Netflix. It might have to do with the fact that Hulu was more niche. It was a streaming company created by various TV companies and it provided access to their TV shows. Netflix, on the other hand, had everything and expanded much more aggressively. I guess all those remotes with a ‘Netflix’ button paid off then.
I used Hulu back in the day, I believe to watch Agents of Shield. Most of the episodes were free with ads but if you wanted to watch the latest episode you’d have to pay for it. It was a good service. Too bad Netflix ate their lunch.
And speaking of Netflix they also released their streaming service the same year as Hulu.
2011
You know in the early days of Netflix they were almost acquired by Amazon for 14–16 million dollars. The offer was almost approved, but thankfully cooler heads prevailed and shot it down.
Good thing they did because Netflix, with the arrival of streaming, had become way bigger than what anyone could have imagined. Now instead of having to drive to the store, wait for a DVD to be shipped to you, or downloading a torrent people could sit back and have the show streamed to their TV. This brought about a golden age. One where streaming companies were rolling in cash.
So what do they do with this cash? Grow bigger of course. And they did this by hiring writers and creating original content. The first big series to come out of this was probably House Of Cards. Yes, that House Of Cards.
