avatarCharlie Lukas

Summary

The article discusses the concept of synchronicity, exploring both its mystical interpretation as meaningful coincidences and the scientific skepticism surrounding it.

Abstract

The article "Synchronicity Isn’t a Real Phenomenon…Right?" delves into the idea of synchronicity, a term coined by Carl Jung to describe seemingly meaningful coincidences without causal connection. It presents a personal anecdote of an uncanny experience of synchronicity in the author's life, followed by Jung's perspective that these events might hint at something beyond our understanding. The article contrasts this with a scientific viewpoint that dismisses synchronicity as a result of confirmation bias, the human desire for meaning, and the tendency to overestimate the rarity of events. It also touches on the possibility of synchronicity being a symptom of deranged thinking, akin to schizophrenia. Ultimately, the author remains open-minded about the phenomenon, suggesting it could be a form of resonance or an effect of one's thoughts on their environment, while also cautioning against overreliance on synchronicities to guide one's life.

Opinions

  • Personal Experience: The author shares a profound personal experience with synchronicity that challenges their skepticism.
  • Carl Jung's View: Jung is cited as believing in synchronicity as an "acausal connecting principle," suggesting a deeper meaning behind coincidences.
  • Mystical Perspective: The article entertains the idea that synchronicity could be evidence of a deeper connection between consciousness and the world, possibly even paranormal.
  • Scientific Skepticism: Skeptics argue that synchronicity is a product of human biases, such as confirmation bias, and an overestimation of the significance of random events.
  • Schizophrenia Comparison: The article notes that seeing meaning in random events can be a symptom of schizophrenia, casting doubt on the validity of synchronicity.
  • Author's Stance: The author remains agnostic, acknowledging the mysteries of the universe and the potential validity of synchronicity, while also emphasizing the importance of personal responsibility in life choices.
  • Pragmatic Approach: Despite the intrigue of synchronicity, the author advises readers not to rely on it for solving real-life problems, advocating for a balanced view that appreciates the mystery without being consumed by it.

Synchronicity Isn’t a Real Phenomenon…Right?

Let’s dabble in the uncanny

Snapwire via Pexels

You know, acting like an empirical scientist all the time isn’t a hell of a lot of fun. So for this one article, let’s allow ourselves to get weird, and examine a phenomenon that most people experience on a regular basis — they just don't think much of it.

I’m talking about synchronicity. Here’s the definition:

Synchronicity is a phenomenon in which people interpret two separate — and seemingly unrelated — experiences as being meaningfully intertwined, even though there is no evidence that one led to the other or that the two events are linked in any other causal way.

You know when something happens to you that feels too convenient? You have a random thought about a friend, and they end up calling you the same day. Or you’re daydreaming about something, and something related to your daydream appears right in front of you? Hard not to notice, right?

There are many theories about this phenomenon, and we’ll explore different perspectives, but first…

A Shocking Example of Synchronicity

The following is the most blatant example of synchronicity occurring in my life.

I was depressed. Part of me desperately wanted to try something new, but I felt like I was too old for it. I wanted to pick up an instrument and learn music. But the doubt was eating me up, and I was getting around to thinking it wasn’t worth it.

Then something strange happened.

Later that day I was sitting down to eat dinner, and Jeopardy was on. It was the show’s most recent episode. They were on that painfully awkward segment after the first commercial break when Alex Trebek interviews his contestants. Alex’s first guest said something that made me perk up.

The man talked about how he had never learned to play music until his 30s, and since he started playing the violin, he’s joined a string quartet. He ended the Q&A by saying, “You’re never too old to get good at something.”

I try to stay out of the wooey spiritual realm of thought. But when that happened I had to stop and say to myself, “Is someone fucking with me? Am I on The Truman Show?”

What are the odds that of all days, of all times, of all episodes, of all individuals, I would be present for this man to say exactly what I needed to hear, exactly when I needed to hear it?

The Mystical Perspective

Carl Jung coined the term synchronicity, and he was the first person to give it serious thought.

Jung called it an “acausal connecting principle,” or a meaningful event that seems to occur outside the space of cause and effect.

Jung didn’t deny the possibility of chance, or that coincidences were just coincidences. His point was that sometimes, these moments hit so close to home that it’s hard not to wonder:

When coincidences pile up in this way, one cannot help being impressed by them — for the greater the number of terms in such a series, or the more unusual its character, the more improbable it becomes.

You can’t rationally prove that any coincidence has meaning, but Jung felt that moments like this could point to evidence of something beyond our direct understanding. Maybe even something paranormal.

The western world loves causality. But in the east, and throughout history, the instinct was to believe that everything had meaning. The stars, the rain, the wind — all of it was the work of some unseen force. People felt it was the will of God, or Gods, or a universal intelligence in nature.

They couldn’t explain things in any other way, so that’s what they went with. Eventually, we became so rational that believing in something more than mere chance to explain events started seeming foolish.

Have we become too arrogant? Does our consciousness have a deeper connection to the world than we realize? Has our scientific instrumentality cut us off from something important?

The Cold, Hard, Scientific Perspective

Synchronicity is what most scientists would call “psychobabble bullshit.” And they have a host of reasons why.

Synchronicity skeptics argue that human beings are so thirsty for meaning that they will find it even when it’s not there. Think of a person claiming to have seen Jesus Christ in a piece of toast. That’s what synchronicity is.

Here are some other arguments they give:

  • Confirmation Bias: We want what we hope is true, to be true! So, when we believe something, we tend to only seek out information that confirms our beliefs. If you want to believe in mysticism, you are more likely to see a random event as some kind of divine occurrence.
  • Objective Meaning: A person can feel a sense of meaning from a random occurrence, but there is no real way for them to prove it has objective meaning. Also, we may not realize how statistically likely something is to occur. What seems rare, might not be as rare as you think.
  • Deranged Thinking: Seeing meaning in everything and feeling like a higher power is communicating with you is a hallmark symptom of schizophrenia. Whether it’s through license plate numbers or a news anchor's stare, someone is communicating with them. Everything is synchronicity.

Skeptics say that synchronicity is pseudoscience to the highest degree. We know enough about the universe, mathematics, and probability to conclude that things just happen. End of discussion.

What I Believe About Synchronicity

One thing I would never say is that human beings have it all figured out. Despite every scientific, mathematical, and technological breakthrough, it would be pretty arrogant to claim that there is no mystery left.

So do I believe in synchronicity? Maybe on a day when I’m feeling extra open-minded. Right now, let’s say I do. I just have some thoughts:

  • What would be the point of synchronicity? Is someone or something delivering me messages in the form of little moments? Is it benevolent? It is anything?
  • A ghost giving you hints on how to live a better life seems ridiculous. I think synchronicity would be more like your thoughts and intentions having an effect on an environment that only you could notice.
  • I don’t like the idea of being watched, but I don’t think that’s what synchronicity is meant to be. It’s more like a resonance. I don’t know if you cause it or not, but that was the point right? It’s “acausal.”
  • Maybe it’s some kind of infinite, multidimensional, fractal dimension colliding with your reality. Or maybe I should stop thinking.

I have no disrespect for anyone with spiritual or religious beliefs. In fact, I think there’s nothing worse than someone who delights in tearing down belief systems that people find hope in. So believe if you want, but…

Don’t Lose Sleep Over It

Whether you choose to believe in meaningful coincidences or not, you should just live your life. Synchronicities can’t save you from your situation. The universe is not going to come to your aid and solve your problems for you. That I know for sure.

So let it be food for thought. I find the mystery intriguing. If you choose to believe, I hope it leads you in the right direction, and if you don’t, then good on you too.

Maybe you haven’t had any synchronicities in a long time, but the thing is, whether you believe or not, you always know when you do.

Synchronicity
Science
Psychology
Meaning
Universe
Recommended from ReadMedium